k0SAHTI

k0SAHTI — CS2 Stats

FI76561198364723662[U:1:404457934]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,365Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating25,013Top 25% of 213,211 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#21310 of 259896 tracked
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,013 +3,098 12 Aug – 3 Nov · 40 days played
21,16026,527peak 26,52712 Aug3 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,958 +0 5 Sept – 26 Oct · 3 observations
1,9581,958peak 1,9585 Sept26 Oct
26,527Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,958Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-08-12

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,958
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 43 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-05
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-05

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,514 below peak (26,527)
  • +3,099 over 30 days · improving
  • +3,098 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,987 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-10-26
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGk0SAHTIPREMIER25,013 · Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,958csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning66
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–40–4Last 10056%Win rateLWLLWLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +4.2pp headshot accuracy · +53ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 565ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility4.6
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 567ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning6.6
Utility4.6
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time567ms+16ms
first ⅓ avg 552ms → last ⅓ avg 567ms
Headshot accuracy23.0%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 23.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–9 · ancient, 3 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 9–0 · cache, 5 Oct →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · cache, 24 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 10 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
8–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 80% over 20anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2413–1154%0.00
nukeS2016–480%0.02
cacheA2012–860%0.01
dust2C146–843%0.02
ancientA116–555%0.03
anubisD51–420%-0.01
infernoC52–340%0.01
shelter—10–10%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

539Matches
52%Win rate
1.26Avg K/D
85.8ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage12754%1.3317.5
Nuke6058%1.2817.6
Inferno4949%1.4419.0
Ancient4945%1.1916.6
Anubis3839%1.3117.8
Train2556%1.6818.0
Overpass1662%1.3318.4
Dust21164%1.1617.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.8%Headshot accuracy
30.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.3%Spray accuracy
74.7%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
567msReaction time
49.1%T opening success
37.0%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
3.3%Flash assists
8.28HE damage / grenade
5.70Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 37.0256% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust210–130.0434%3 Nov →
ancient13–20.0231%3 Nov →
dust29–13-0.0130%2 Nov →
anubis2–80.0342%2 Nov →
nuke13–80.0726%2 Nov →
ancient7–130.0322%1 Nov →
inferno13–70.0320%1 Nov →
anubis10–13-0.0422%30 Oct →
dust26–130.0029%30 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.029%30 Oct →
nuke13–110.0529%30 Oct →
mirage15–150.0125%29 Oct →
nuke13–50.0723%29 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.0217%28 Oct →
nuke10–130.0015%28 Oct →
anubis13–60.0720%28 Oct →
cache9–130.0429%28 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0520%26 Oct →
cache13–40.0124%25 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0421%22 Oct →
nuke13–100.0023%21 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0417%21 Oct →
inferno10–130.0120%21 Oct →
inferno13–90.0424%16 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0535%16 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.068%16 Oct →
mirage13–90.0522%15 Oct →
nuke13–40.0222%15 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0016%15 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0116%15 Oct →
cache13–40.0328%15 Oct →
dust213–30.1429%15 Oct →
mirage16–140.0015%14 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0017%14 Oct →
mirage13–70.0314%14 Oct →
shelter12–120.0445%10 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0714%9 Oct →
cache14–16-0.0541%9 Oct →
dust29–130.0124%8 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0116%8 Oct →
mirage13–80.0633%7 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0223%7 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0122%7 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0618%6 Oct →
inferno6–130.0626%6 Oct →
cache13–100.0226%6 Oct →
ancient13–100.0424%6 Oct →
nuke13–90.0433%5 Oct →
cache9–00.0950%5 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0224%5 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0229%4 Oct →
nuke15–15-0.0226%4 Oct →
ancient9–130.0526%4 Oct →
dust213–110.0739%2 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0317%1 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0326%30 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0221%29 Sept →
nuke13–20.0726%29 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0133%29 Sept →
ancient6–130.0020%28 Sept →
nuke13–110.0234%28 Sept →
ancient8–130.0026%17 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0136%15 Sept →
cache11–130.0028%15 Sept →
mirage16–120.0225%14 Sept →
nuke13–90.0022%14 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0229%11 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0029%10 Sept →
mirage13–90.0322%10 Sept →
dust213–10.1026%10 Sept →
ancient13–40.1033%10 Sept →
mirage11–130.0822%6 Sept →
cache13–60.0827%6 Sept →
dust211–130.0330%5 Sept →
cache8–130.0417%5 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0227%4 Sept →
cache13–110.0023%4 Sept →
dust213–110.0314%3 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0521%3 Sept →
ancient13–90.1626%3 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0914%3 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0530%3 Sept →
nuke13–70.0628%3 Sept →
mirage13–80.0024%3 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0413%3 Sept →
mirage0–4-0.040%3 Sept →
mirage13–40.0132%26 Aug →
nuke13–100.0722%26 Aug →
ancient13–90.0114%26 Aug →
nuke13–80.0531%26 Aug →
mirage13–60.0628%26 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0418%25 Aug →
mirage4–130.0318%24 Aug →
cache13–60.0323%24 Aug →
nuke15–150.0429%19 Aug →
ancient13–100.0222%19 Aug →
mirage13–40.0230%19 Aug →
cache13–160.019%17 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0623%17 Aug →
cache13–6-0.0618%12 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.