somnambulist

somnambulist — CS2 Stats

76561198204683235[U:1:244417507]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,489Tracked matches68%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Sep 2026 (17 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,345 → 2,345
+10Tracked matches · now 1,489
+9.2ppWin rate · 58.6% → 67.9%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 53 days played since 13 Nov 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

2,345Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
53Days played since 2025-11-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,345
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 155 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-07
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-07

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsomnambulistPEAK ELO2,345csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning63
Utility22

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT56395Last 10056%Win rateWWWWWWTWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −0.8pp headshot accuracy · −51ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 50 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 505ms

Last 10

  • 901 · 90% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 489ms

Last 20

  • 1532 · 75% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 515ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility2.2
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels4.7
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerStrong T-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 60% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 60% on T to 37% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning6.3
Utility2.2
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels4.7
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time541ms−83ms
first ⅓ avg 625ms → last ⅓ avg 541ms
Headshot accuracy21.2%−0.6%
first ⅓ avg 21.7% → last ⅓ avg 21.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–2 · mirage, 1 May
50%Best headshot accuracy · 3–0 · nuke, 29 Jun
375msFastest reaction time · 3–0 · nuke, 29 Jun
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 11 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W6Current streak
27In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 80% over 10mirageWeakest map · 36% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2281436%0.00
nukeA2113862%0.02
dust2C135838%-0.02
anubisA116555%0.01
ancientS108280%0.01
cacheA85363%-0.00
overpassS54180%-0.00
inferno42250%-0.05
vertigo440100%0.04
train21150%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,178Matches
52%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
70.9ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke15059%1.0013.9
Anubis14150%0.9012.7
Ancient12448%0.9513.4
Mirage12254%1.0214.7
Dust26237%0.8513.4
Overpass5062%1.1215.9
Inferno4450%0.8913.1
Train3861%0.9514.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.1%Headshot accuracy
39.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.6%Spray accuracy
83.5%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
539msReaction time
60.4%T opening success
37.4%CT opening success
0.38Enemies flashed / flash
0.0%Flash assists
9.67HE damage / grenade
1.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3759 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 37.4284% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–100.0429%22 Sept
anubis13–60.0215%17 Sept
cache16–13-0.0011%17 Sept
ancient13–100.0329%11 Sept
cache13–30.0728%11 Sept
anubis13–7-0.0118%11 Sept
cache15–15-0.0125%11 Sept
mirage13–10.0712%11 Sept
dust213–100.0439%11 Sept
nuke13–30.0727%11 Sept
inferno4–9-0.1542%21 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0419%21 Aug
dust213–60.0116%5 Aug
vertigo13–100.0223%3 Aug
nuke9–13-0.018%28 Jul
nuke12–120.0226%20 Jul
cache13–7-0.0222%20 Jul
anubis13–100.1031%12 Jul
ancient13–40.0538%7 Jul
mirage13–70.0218%3 Jul
anubis13–70.067%3 Jul
cache13–80.0227%2 Jul
nuke7–13-0.048%29 Jun
cache8–13-0.079%29 Jun
nuke3–0-0.0450%29 Jun
cache8–13-0.0319%29 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0112%16 Jun
ancient13–40.0920%1 Jun
mirage4–13-0.059%1 Jun
mirage4–130.0013%25 May
anubis4–13-0.0117%21 May
overpass16–14-0.008%21 May
nuke13–70.0125%1 May
mirage13–20.1119%1 May
ancient13–30.0312%1 May
dust213–10-0.0424%26 Apr
dust28–130.0111%24 Apr
nuke13–50.1030%22 Apr
mirage3–130.0424%5 Apr
nuke13–100.0315%27 Mar
overpass14–16-0.0125%27 Mar
mirage13–1-0.0213%26 Mar
anubis9–13-0.0215%24 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0022%24 Mar
dust21–13-0.0136%20 Mar
nuke2–60.0023%20 Mar
mirage11–130.0222%13 Mar
inferno13–60.0321%10 Mar
anubis13–6-0.0211%10 Mar
mirage13–40.0326%10 Mar
anubis7–13-0.0413%3 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0120%24 Feb
dust26–13-0.0412%20 Feb
inferno13–50.0310%27 Jan
anubis11–13-0.0415%25 Jan
ancient12–120.0115%25 Jan
mirage11–13-0.0618%25 Jan
nuke13–10-0.035%25 Jan
mirage13–70.0017%20 Jan
mirage10–130.0114%20 Jan
ancient13–5-0.0215%20 Jan
anubis13–40.1131%16 Jan
nuke13–90.0120%13 Jan
overpass13–60.0126%13 Jan
dust29–13-0.0123%6 Jan
ancient13–100.0218%2 Jan
nuke13–80.0524%2 Jan
mirage7–13-0.0623%29 Dec
mirage13–50.0619%27 Dec
mirage13–10-0.0122%19 Dec
vertigo13–90.0425%19 Dec
inferno7–9-0.1022%19 Dec
nuke13–50.0223%19 Dec
vertigo13–80.0319%18 Dec
mirage3–13-0.0825%18 Dec
nuke13–70.0224%18 Dec
vertigo13–100.0721%18 Dec
dust24–13-0.0520%18 Dec
overpass13–30.0220%15 Dec
train5–130.0324%15 Dec
ancient13–6-0.0011%14 Dec
mirage12–120.0217%6 Dec
dust213–8-0.0211%6 Dec
nuke5–130.0632%6 Dec
dust213–9-0.0323%6 Dec
train13–11-0.0140%6 Dec
nuke11–130.0018%28 Nov
nuke13–50.0023%27 Nov
mirage8–13-0.057%27 Nov
ancient12–12-0.0710%27 Nov
dust28–130.0228%27 Nov
dust29–13-0.0220%21 Nov
ancient13–9-0.068%20 Nov
nuke13–60.019%19 Nov
nuke13–30.0625%18 Nov
nuke10–130.0423%14 Nov
nuke10–130.0038%14 Nov
dust21–9-0.0538%13 Nov
mirage2–130.0132%13 Nov
overpass13–10-0.0219%13 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →