76561198202772059

76561198202772059 — CS2 Stats

76561198202772059[U:1:242506331]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

915Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating15,341Purple band · top ~27% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,299 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 58 days played since 27 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,341 -1,967 27 Apr13 Sept · 29 days played
15,00017,657peak 17,65727 Apr13 Sept
17,903Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,299Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
58Days played since 2026-04-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,299
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 52 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,316 below peak (17,657)
  • -517 over 30 days · declining
  • -1,347 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 4,659 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG76561198202772059FACEITLevel 6 · 1,299 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER15,341 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,299csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning47
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51472Last 10051%Win rateWWLWWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −8.1pp headshot accuracy · +33ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 705ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 612ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 596ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility6.3
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning4.7
Utility6.3
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time594ms+3ms
first ⅓ avg 591ms → last ⅓ avg 594ms
Headshot accuracy14.4%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 14.6% → last ⅓ avg 14.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–4 · anubis, 25 Jul
30%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · dust2, 14 Jul
352msFastest reaction time · 3–10 · anubis, 15 Jun
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 14 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
113In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 75% over 8nukeWeakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C1871139%0.01
nukeC1661038%-0.02
ancientB158753%0.00
infernoA159660%0.02
anubisB115645%0.01
mirageS86275%0.04
cacheA74357%-0.01
overpass42250%-0.02
poseidon21150%-0.01
eldorado21150%-0.10
vertigo110100%0.04
debris110100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

219Matches
54%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
79.2ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3067%1.1016.4
Anubis2357%1.0314.2
Nuke2157%1.1015.4
Dust22157%1.1816.9
Ancient1958%1.1418.6
Inferno1856%1.0913.6
Cache1233%1.0516.9
Train333%0.8417.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.2%Headshot accuracy
37.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.0%Spray accuracy
82.3%Counter-strafing
12.0°Preaim
571msReaction time
21.2%T opening success
43.9%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
9.4%Flash assists
9.35HE damage / grenade
17.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.1842% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo13–80.0411%19 Sept
dust213–80.0313%13 Sept
nuke6–9-0.1115%9 Sept
poseidon9–70.037%9 Sept
eldorado9–4-0.024%9 Sept
ancient5–13-0.019%25 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0313%23 Aug
ancient9–13-0.049%23 Aug
dust213–60.0418%23 Aug
ancient13–30.1210%21 Aug
cache1–13-0.0311%18 Aug
cache19–15-0.0316%17 Aug
anubis12–16-0.0220%16 Aug
cache16–130.0125%13 Aug
dust213–60.0616%8 Aug
mirage7–130.0518%5 Aug
inferno5–130.0021%2 Aug
ancient0–7-0.0225%2 Aug
dust27–13-0.0124%1 Aug
dust27–13-0.0615%1 Aug
anubis4–13-0.1211%30 Jul
nuke9–13-0.068%26 Jul
inferno13–10.025%26 Jul
nuke13–10.0511%26 Jul
dust213–110.0711%25 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0416%25 Jul
anubis13–40.1418%25 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0212%24 Jul
anubis13–70.0912%24 Jul
inferno13–80.048%24 Jul
inferno13–110.1018%24 Jul
nuke13–60.0316%23 Jul
ancient13–110.0328%22 Jul
ancient9–130.0213%19 Jul
ancient16–14-0.0315%18 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0212%18 Jul
dust213–90.0522%18 Jul
inferno1–13-0.050%18 Jul
cache10–13-0.066%18 Jul
cache13–50.0116%17 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0019%15 Jul
dust29–13-0.0230%14 Jul
debris9–7-0.018%13 Jul
eldorado2–9-0.1929%13 Jul
poseidon7–9-0.0614%13 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0217%12 Jul
mirage13–50.0215%11 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0127%10 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0130%7 Jul
nuke6–13-0.055%5 Jul
dust29–130.0327%5 Jul
cache12–12-0.039%4 Jul
dust213–90.046%4 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0614%27 Jun
ancient19–170.0017%17 Jun
mirage4–130.0315%15 Jun
anubis3–10-0.000%15 Jun
ancient13–00.0813%14 Jun
inferno9–130.0213%14 Jun
overpass13–90.0313%14 Jun
overpass5–13-0.049%14 Jun
dust215–150.0313%13 Jun
nuke3–60.0615%12 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0720%9 Jun
anubis7–30.0317%7 Jun
dust211–130.0111%7 Jun
inferno13–40.1012%7 Jun
dust29–13-0.0214%7 Jun
anubis13–30.065%4 Jun
overpass3–9-0.0813%1 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0413%28 May
overpass13–110.022%28 May
cache13–90.0312%21 May
anubis13–10-0.0217%20 May
mirage13–80.1029%20 May
inferno8–130.0218%18 May
inferno13–8-0.034%18 May
ancient13–60.0222%16 May
dust213–7-0.0120%16 May
mirage13–90.1024%15 May
dust210–13-0.0217%14 May
inferno16–14-0.0313%13 May
ancient13–7-0.0517%13 May
nuke13–80.0612%13 May
inferno13–110.0217%11 May
dust211–130.0517%11 May
inferno12–30.0121%11 May
nuke9–13-0.0413%10 May
nuke13–7-0.039%7 May
mirage13–60.0315%5 May
dust23–13-0.0114%3 May
nuke13–10.0626%3 May
inferno6–130.1112%3 May
nuke5–13-0.113%2 May
nuke10–13-0.0913%2 May
ancient13–80.0114%2 May
anubis9–13-0.0111%28 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0114%27 Apr
mirage13–40.0117%27 Apr
dust28–13-0.0413%27 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →