Lucario.

Lucario. — CS2 Stats

BF76561198200862786[U:1:240597058]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

789Tracked matches57%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,542Hours in CS11Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,842 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Nov 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,842 → 1,842
+4Tracked matches · now 789
0.0ppWin rate · 56.7% → 56.7%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,842 +0 8 Sept – 10 Nov · 4 observations
1,8421,842peak 1,8428 Sept10 Nov
1,842Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
68Days played since 2025-11-19

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,842
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 159 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-08
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-08

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate32.8%45.7%46.8%14.0% short
Shot accuracy10.7%12.7%13.0%2.3% short
Kill/death ratio1.081.051.06meets
Match win rate45.8%45.7%46.3%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLucario.FACEITLevel 7 · 1,842 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,842csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning61
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–47–1Last 10052%Win rateWLLLWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −0.2pp headshot accuracy · −6ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+0.8 against its own average).

Aim6.2
Utility6.2
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 578ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning6.1
Utility6.2
Mechanics4.1
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time583ms−33ms
first ⅓ avg 616ms → last ⅓ avg 583ms
Headshot accuracy14.8%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 15.0% → last ⅓ avg 14.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–11 · mirage, 20 Aug →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 2–12 · mirage, 19 Feb →
422msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · inferno, 11 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 13 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
13–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 6infernoWeakest map · 40% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB4222–2052%0.02
infernoC156–940%-0.01
dust2B147–750%0.00
anubisB105–550%-0.00
nukeB84–450%-0.00
ancientS64–267%-0.03
cache—43–175%-0.03
overpass—11–0100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

68,007Lifetime kills
1.08K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players
3,482Matches
45.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
32.8%Headshot %
10.7%Shot accuracy
9,241MVPs
1,385Hours (in match)
3,774Bombs planted
890Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP14,287
AK-4714,203
Knife2,215
MAC-101,909
MP91,818
P901,418

Lifetime map wins

5,033inferno
3,013dust2
1,075nuke
499train
429vertigo
318lake
242safehouse
169cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,246Matches
49%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
85.0ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage53451%1.2618.0
Inferno22751%1.1416.7
Dust214440%1.0715.8
Ancient10745%1.0917.1
Anubis10643%1.1717.3
Nuke5646%1.1617.6
Overpass2665%1.2620.0
Vertigo2343%1.0917.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.4%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
68.5%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
578msReaction time
43.6%T opening success
51.3%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
7.1%Flash assists
12.61HE damage / grenade
8.21Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–70.0611%11 Nov →
mirage10–13-0.0111%16 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0113%11 Oct →
dust210–130.0131%5 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0513%21 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0111%20 Sept →
dust213–100.0717%18 Sept →
mirage13–70.1213%13 Sept →
inferno6–130.0216%11 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0420%10 Sept →
inferno15–19-0.0515%3 Sept →
mirage13–110.0821%31 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0126%28 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0411%26 Aug →
nuke14–160.0420%26 Aug →
mirage13–110.1512%20 Aug →
anubis13–3-0.0312%19 Aug →
ancient13–60.0325%18 Aug →
dust211–130.0210%12 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.026%11 Aug →
mirage13–30.099%8 Aug →
mirage13–30.077%4 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0316%4 Aug →
dust28–13-0.078%30 Jul →
dust213–110.0422%29 Jul →
mirage19–160.0820%28 Jul →
dust219–15-0.0311%25 Jul →
anubis4–130.0325%24 Jul →
mirage5–130.0411%24 Jul →
mirage16–130.0213%24 Jul →
mirage16–140.059%24 Jul →
mirage13–80.0211%23 Jul →
mirage13–110.0513%23 Jul →
dust213–110.1024%23 Jul →
mirage12–16-0.0217%23 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0419%22 Jul →
ancient3–13-0.0913%22 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.016%22 Jul →
mirage13–50.1022%22 Jul →
anubis3–13-0.080%22 Jul →
dust213–50.0619%22 Jul →
anubis13–80.0112%22 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.033%22 Jul →
anubis16–120.068%22 Jul →
dust27–13-0.006%22 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.008%21 Jul →
anubis13–100.022%19 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0223%18 Jul →
mirage10–130.0215%18 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.060%15 Jul →
ancient3–13-0.0521%13 Jul →
dust24–13-0.0320%10 Jul →
dust22–6-0.0613%10 Jul →
nuke13–10-0.054%10 Jul →
mirage13–50.0312%10 Jul →
mirage13–6-0.0117%9 Jul →
inferno13–10-0.0224%9 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.0615%9 Jul →
dust213–16-0.0917%9 Jul →
mirage0–13-0.0611%9 Jul →
cache13–6-0.0711%9 Jul →
dust213–9-0.027%9 Jul →
mirage13–4-0.037%9 Jul →
anubis14–16-0.027%5 Jul →
inferno13–10.1413%13 Jun →
mirage5–13-0.0416%6 May →
cache13–6-0.039%30 Apr →
cache9–130.029%30 Apr →
mirage17–190.0318%27 Apr →
mirage16–140.029%24 Apr →
mirage11–13-0.019%23 Apr →
nuke9–13-0.0125%17 Apr →
nuke13–50.0221%17 Apr →
anubis11–130.0517%16 Apr →
anubis10–13-0.0312%16 Apr →
nuke15–150.0210%12 Apr →
inferno13–3-0.0123%11 Apr →
mirage13–8-0.0211%29 Mar →
mirage7–130.0231%21 Mar →
inferno11–13-0.0214%19 Mar →
mirage13–80.0314%18 Mar →
mirage13–50.028%12 Mar →
inferno4–13-0.067%6 Mar →
nuke13–70.0422%4 Mar →
inferno7–130.0216%27 Feb →
dust213–60.0217%21 Feb →
nuke13–11-0.0213%20 Feb →
mirage2–12-0.0333%19 Feb →
overpass16–130.0118%6 Feb →
anubis16–14-0.0111%5 Feb →
mirage13–11-0.0020%30 Jan →
inferno4–13-0.0722%22 Jan →
ancient13–80.0115%16 Jan →
inferno5–13-0.035%14 Jan →
mirage13–4-0.040%11 Jan →
nuke0–10-0.0624%8 Jan →
mirage4–13-0.0019%4 Jan →
mirage13–60.068%25 Nov →
inferno13–110.027%19 Nov →
mirage8–13-0.027%19 Nov →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.