handels

handels — CS2 Stats

FI76561198198472030[U:1:238206302]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,867Tracked matches39%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.1 LearningSupport
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,483 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 70 days played since 8 Aug 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

1,483Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
70Days played since 2025-08-08

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,483
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 48 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-20
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-20

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGhandelsFACEITLevel 6 · 1,483 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPEAK ELO1,483csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim30
Positioning46
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY38593Last 10038%Win rateWLWWWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +4.1pp headshot accuracy · −46ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 587ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 610ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim3.0
Utility5.6
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 60% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 16% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 639ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 61% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.0
Positioning4.6
Utility5.6
Mechanics2.5
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact1.4

Composite 3.1/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time638ms−55ms
first ⅓ avg 693ms → last ⅓ avg 638ms
Headshot accuracy14.6%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 16.7% → last ⅓ avg 14.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 8–8 · vertigo, 10 Dec
38%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · train, 23 Dec
445msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · anubis, 11 Jan
13–3Biggest win · nuke, 16 Feb

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
610In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
19Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 52% over 27anubisWeakest map · 0% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD2982128%-0.02
nukeB27141352%-0.01
dust2D1551033%-0.02
ancientC94544%-0.03
anubisD6060%-0.03
overpassD51420%-0.01
cache32167%-0.02
train32167%-0.02
inferno220100%-0.01
vertigo1010%0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,800Matches
50%Win rate
0.88Avg K/D
66.0ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke26764%0.9213.4
Mirage25044%0.8412.9
Dust215939%0.8012.4
Anubis11152%0.9013.0
Train5252%0.8813.0
Ancient5143%0.7412.0
Overpass4549%0.8813.7
Vertigo2133%0.8812.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.1%Headshot accuracy
30.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.2%Spray accuracy
61.3%Counter-strafing
12.0°Preaim
639msReaction time
15.9%T opening success
47.9%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
8.3%Flash assists
10.51HE damage / grenade
9.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.1373% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4415 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 15.9251% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache16–14-0.0016%14 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0212%13 Sept
nuke13–100.0127%8 Sept
nuke13–8-0.0218%7 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0111%7 Sept
cache13–7-0.0519%30 Aug
dust28–13-0.0311%29 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0518%28 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0912%24 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0118%22 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0313%22 Aug
nuke10–130.008%16 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0217%16 Aug
mirage11–13-0.036%13 Aug
ancient16–13-0.0514%13 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0716%7 Aug
ancient13–90.0219%7 Aug
cache15–15-0.015%7 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0512%7 Aug
overpass11–13-0.0111%25 Jun
mirage15–150.029%23 May
mirage9–130.0121%24 Apr
overpass5–13-0.047%24 Apr
mirage9–130.0117%24 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0219%21 Apr
nuke13–7-0.0013%12 Apr
mirage13–90.0317%12 Apr
overpass16–130.0115%10 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0115%2 Apr
overpass11–13-0.0816%31 Mar
ancient7–13-0.0621%31 Mar
nuke13–9-0.0215%28 Mar
mirage3–13-0.0417%27 Mar
mirage13–100.019%26 Mar
ancient16–13-0.047%25 Mar
anubis14–16-0.0215%25 Mar
nuke8–13-0.029%22 Mar
nuke13–80.009%22 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0713%21 Mar
dust25–13-0.0720%20 Mar
ancient13–80.0112%19 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0611%17 Mar
mirage13–16-0.0614%15 Mar
dust24–13-0.0429%15 Mar
nuke16–120.0116%15 Mar
mirage13–100.0216%13 Mar
mirage13–80.0018%13 Mar
dust27–13-0.0315%12 Mar
mirage13–60.037%12 Mar
nuke13–16-0.0213%12 Mar
inferno13–11-0.0715%5 Mar
nuke11–13-0.0113%3 Mar
nuke6–13-0.0524%1 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0929%26 Feb
dust213–50.0418%26 Feb
nuke13–7-0.0020%25 Feb
nuke8–13-0.0319%23 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0415%19 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0331%17 Feb
dust213–160.0422%17 Feb
nuke13–30.0117%16 Feb
nuke13–90.0618%16 Feb
dust23–13-0.0611%15 Feb
anubis7–13-0.0410%15 Feb
nuke13–100.0211%15 Feb
dust213–50.0927%11 Feb
mirage13–7-0.0124%11 Feb
mirage3–11-0.0311%9 Feb
anubis4–13-0.0510%5 Feb
dust216–130.0214%5 Feb
nuke13–110.1013%5 Feb
anubis13–16-0.0312%30 Jan
dust29–13-0.0711%18 Jan
dust28–13-0.0121%12 Jan
dust210–13-0.0713%11 Jan
anubis5–130.019%11 Jan
dust222–18-0.0212%8 Jan
dust219–15-0.019%6 Jan
dust23–13-0.0323%2 Jan
train4–13-0.0638%23 Dec
nuke12–16-0.0410%22 Dec
train13–110.0215%17 Dec
ancient8–13-0.0314%17 Dec
vertigo8–80.1226%10 Dec
inferno9–60.0521%10 Dec
nuke6–13-0.0313%8 Dec
overpass7–90.0625%27 Nov
mirage10–13-0.0216%16 Nov
nuke7–13-0.0510%31 Oct
mirage8–13-0.0710%4 Oct
nuke15–190.0211%26 Sept
mirage8–130.0125%8 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0127%28 Aug
mirage13–60.0220%28 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0126%26 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0417%20 Aug
nuke16–19-0.0513%14 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0117%13 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0117%10 Aug
train28–26-0.0120%8 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →