Polex

Polex — CS2 Stats

BR76561198192294717[U:1:232028989]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,101Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,196Hours in CS
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,918Top 25% of 204,097 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#31836 of 251178 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Sep 2026 (29 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,918 -4,018 26 Jun – 11 Sept · 11 days played
23,45829,018peak 29,01826 Jun11 Sept
29,117Peak Premier in tracked matches
26Days played since 2026-06-26

Premier CS Rating

  • 5,100 below peak (29,018)
  • +149 over 30 days · steady
  • -4,018 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,082 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,773), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate40.7%46.8%48.2%7.5% short
Shot accuracy19.4%13.0%13.3%above
Kill/death ratio0.911.061.070.16 short
Match win rate47.2%46.3%46.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPolexFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER23,918 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning67
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–46–4Last 10050%Win rateLLLWLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −3.3pp headshot accuracy · −67ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 476ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 498ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 532ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility5.6
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch5.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 559ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning6.7
Utility5.6
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time578ms+30ms
first ⅓ avg 548ms → last ⅓ avg 578ms
Headshot accuracy20.8%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 22.7% → last ⅓ avg 20.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–5 · inferno, 30 Jun →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–3 · mirage, 13 Jul →
398msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · cache, 25 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · overpass, 30 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L3Current streak
7–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 61% over 23ancientWeakest map · 43% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3115–1648%0.02
dust2C2712–1544%0.01
infernoA2314–961%0.03
ancientC73–443%0.01
overpassB63–350%0.01
cache—43–175%0.02
anubis—20–20%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

228,220Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
8,186Matches
47.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
40.7%Headshot %
19.4%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 8 players
23,039MVPs
5,196Hours (in match)
13,818Bombs planted
2,415Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP71,902
AK-4754,757
P2504,351
Tec-93,265
P902,999
Knife2,674

Lifetime map wins

19,516dust2
17,291inferno
1,220vertigo
1,050cbble
940train
401nuke
32safehouse
16ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

164Matches
59%Win rate
1.37Avg K/D
84.0ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust23944%1.3418.0
Mirage2767%1.4417.1
Inferno2669%1.5318.4
Ancient1354%1.0715.6
Cache1164%1.3917.6
Anubis10%1.0014.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.7%Headshot accuracy
38.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.4%Spray accuracy
84.7%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
559msReaction time
35.6%T opening success
53.9%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
9.9%Flash assists
9.02HE damage / grenade
14.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.5824% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno8–13-0.018%28 Sept →
cache6–130.056%25 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.0512%11 Sept →
inferno16–130.1228%3 Sept →
anubis8–130.0021%2 Sept →
mirage13–90.0739%2 Sept →
ancient13–20.0110%2 Sept →
mirage13–90.0615%5 Aug →
dust22–13-0.039%5 Aug →
mirage9–130.0422%4 Aug →
inferno13–80.0825%4 Aug →
ancient9–130.0120%4 Aug →
mirage13–100.0127%4 Aug →
anubis8–130.0113%4 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.036%4 Aug →
dust213–5-0.0327%4 Aug →
ancient1–13-0.0220%3 Aug →
ancient16–120.0529%31 Jul →
cache13–110.0116%30 Jul →
mirage13–30.0419%29 Jul →
dust213–80.1032%28 Jul →
inferno5–50.0218%28 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0518%28 Jul →
mirage10–130.0217%28 Jul →
dust212–120.0826%28 Jul →
inferno11–130.0319%28 Jul →
mirage6–20.1322%28 Jul →
mirage13–90.0226%28 Jul →
inferno3–130.0234%28 Jul →
dust213–60.0025%28 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0717%28 Jul →
dust27–130.0240%28 Jul →
dust210–130.0518%26 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0527%26 Jul →
inferno13–80.0211%26 Jul →
inferno11–130.0018%26 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0821%26 Jul →
dust29–130.0114%26 Jul →
inferno13–80.0414%25 Jul →
dust28–130.0118%25 Jul →
mirage12–12-0.0411%25 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0513%25 Jul →
dust24–13-0.0514%25 Jul →
mirage13–30.0444%25 Jul →
inferno3–13-0.0114%25 Jul →
inferno13–20.0719%25 Jul →
inferno13–3-0.0012%25 Jul →
dust27–130.0220%25 Jul →
dust23–13-0.0419%25 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0120%25 Jul →
dust213–90.1018%25 Jul →
mirage13–160.0620%14 Jul →
dust29–130.0529%14 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0432%14 Jul →
mirage0–3-0.03100%13 Jul →
mirage2–13-0.0022%13 Jul →
cache13–100.0014%13 Jul →
dust210–130.0419%13 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0825%10 Jul →
cache13–60.0311%10 Jul →
dust213–90.1023%9 Jul →
mirage13–30.097%9 Jul →
inferno13–20.1023%7 Jul →
overpass2–13-0.0423%6 Jul →
mirage13–50.089%6 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0424%6 Jul →
mirage9–130.0323%6 Jul →
dust213–8-0.0426%5 Jul →
inferno15–150.0322%5 Jul →
mirage13–50.1316%5 Jul →
dust216–120.0820%5 Jul →
mirage13–5-0.0518%5 Jul →
inferno16–130.0417%5 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0225%4 Jul →
mirage13–160.0417%4 Jul →
dust28–130.0334%4 Jul →
inferno13–40.0615%4 Jul →
ancient9–130.0518%4 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0417%4 Jul →
dust213–6-0.078%4 Jul →
overpass9–13-0.007%4 Jul →
ancient15–150.0115%4 Jul →
mirage5–130.0441%3 Jul →
dust21–13-0.1120%3 Jul →
inferno13–60.0924%3 Jul →
overpass13–20.035%3 Jul →
dust213–100.0425%3 Jul →
mirage11–130.0323%1 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0144%1 Jul →
mirage13–110.0936%30 Jun →
inferno13–50.2226%30 Jun →
overpass13–00.0525%30 Jun →
mirage13–60.0822%26 Jun →
dust216–140.0429%26 Jun →
overpass13–110.0432%26 Jun →
dust213–1-0.0211%26 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.0245%26 Jun →
overpass6–13-0.0119%26 Jun →
inferno13–90.0212%26 Jun →
dust213–90.0136%26 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.