Latz

Latz — CS2 Stats

FI76561198188858571[U:1:228592843]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

544Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 67 days played since 6 Mar 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,201 +4,573 6 Mar28 Jun · 23 days played
7,53215,364peak 15,3646 Mar28 Jun
15,364Peak Premier in tracked matches
67Days played since 2025-03-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLatzFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning44
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45478Last 10045%Win rateWLWLTLLWTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −1.4pp headshot accuracy · +110ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 708ms

Last 10

  • 352 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 688ms

Last 20

  • 6113 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 633ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility4.6
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch2.0

Excellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 659ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning4.4
Utility4.6
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time650ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 667ms → last ⅓ avg 650ms
Headshot accuracy19.8%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 20.6% → last ⅓ avg 19.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 9–3 · inferno, 21 Jun
40%Best headshot accuracy · 8–8 · inferno, 1 Jul
414msFastest reaction time · 2–9 · inferno, 20 Apr
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 8 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
108In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 54% over 39anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB39211854%-0.00
nukeB23121152%0.00
mirageD103730%-0.00
anubisD72529%-0.01
ancientB63350%0.02
dust2C52340%-0.01
cache3030%0.01
overpass32167%0.01
train2020%-0.02
vertigo2020%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

183Matches
52%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
81.3ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke5068%1.0615.6
Inferno4949%0.9616.6
Ancient2756%1.0215.0
Mirage2143%0.8413.6
Dust21729%1.0417.6
Anubis1040%0.8211.6
Train956%1.1516.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.6%Headshot accuracy
34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.0%Spray accuracy
88.4%Counter-strafing
7.2°Preaim
659msReaction time
38.5%T opening success
42.9%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
8.15HE damage / grenade
7.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.5277% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–110.0120%15 Sept
inferno6–9-0.0514%15 Sept
inferno9–60.0326%15 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0129%8 Sept
inferno8–8-0.0624%3 Sept
nuke6–9-0.0521%28 Aug
inferno1–9-0.1618%28 Aug
nuke9–00.0312%28 Aug
inferno8–80.0420%27 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0615%26 Aug
nuke6–9-0.0719%25 Aug
inferno7–90.1429%22 Aug
inferno4–9-0.1915%18 Aug
inferno9–30.1526%17 Aug
inferno3–13-0.039%9 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0122%4 Aug
ancient5–13-0.067%4 Aug
inferno9–40.1135%12 Jul
inferno8–80.0540%1 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0210%28 Jun
nuke1–13-0.0921%28 Jun
nuke9–70.0924%26 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0217%25 Jun
mirage13–50.034%22 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0119%21 Jun
ancient13–70.1114%21 Jun
inferno9–30.2421%21 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0125%18 Jun
anubis13–90.0023%18 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0018%16 Jun
dust213–7-0.059%16 Jun
inferno9–50.0131%16 Jun
nuke9–50.0314%16 Jun
inferno9–40.0618%14 Jun
cache6–13-0.0411%12 Jun
inferno9–50.0539%12 Jun
nuke13–00.0129%8 Jun
nuke13–160.0018%7 Jun
nuke5–9-0.0420%7 Jun
inferno9–6-0.1021%7 Jun
inferno2–9-0.2133%5 Jun
nuke9–40.1325%2 Jun
ancient13–40.1423%1 Jun
dust27–130.0615%23 May
overpass16–14-0.0416%22 May
inferno9–50.0223%22 May
anubis15–150.0123%16 May
inferno9–7-0.0130%16 May
mirage11–130.0925%15 May
nuke13–8-0.0426%15 May
nuke8–13-0.0029%14 May
ancient12–16-0.0316%14 May
overpass11–13-0.0224%14 May
dust28–13-0.0324%14 May
dust213–7-0.0017%12 May
mirage13–70.0617%11 May
anubis13–110.0111%9 May
nuke12–12-0.0118%8 May
cache8–13-0.0025%8 May
cache12–120.0925%8 May
mirage3–13-0.0726%7 May
nuke8–80.1213%2 May
inferno7–9-0.0833%8 Jul
nuke9–6-0.0327%30 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0726%25 Jun
inferno9–5-0.0613%24 Jun
inferno9–50.1520%24 Jun
inferno13–70.0820%23 Jun
inferno8–80.0335%23 Jun
inferno9–50.1424%10 Jun
inferno5–13-0.049%8 Jun
inferno13–7-0.0319%5 Jun
inferno7–90.0416%26 May
inferno2–9-0.1936%2 May
inferno13–8-0.0418%28 Apr
inferno9–70.0724%21 Apr
nuke4–9-0.0015%21 Apr
overpass9–70.1013%20 Apr
nuke9–70.0721%20 Apr
inferno2–9-0.1610%20 Apr
train10–13-0.049%16 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0326%6 Apr
anubis7–13-0.029%5 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0410%2 Apr
nuke13–9-0.0212%2 Apr
vertigo2–13-0.0839%1 Apr
train7–13-0.0130%31 Mar
nuke13–110.0120%31 Mar
vertigo3–9-0.0627%31 Mar
mirage1–13-0.0528%30 Mar
inferno13–8-0.0225%28 Mar
dust214–16-0.0424%21 Mar
nuke13–11-0.0222%20 Mar
nuke7–13-0.0916%20 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0321%17 Mar
anubis6–13-0.0118%16 Mar
inferno13–80.0722%14 Mar
inferno14–160.0222%12 Mar
nuke13–40.0224%6 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0221%6 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →