CED

CED — CS2 Stats

NO76561198184264419[U:1:223998691]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,107Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,060 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,060 → 2,060
+11Tracked matches · now 4,107
0.0ppWin rate · 63.3% → 63.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 75 days played since 10 May 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 2,060 +0 31 Aug10 Sept · 3 observations
2,0602,060peak 2,06031 Aug10 Sept
2,060Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
75Days played since 2025-05-10

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,060
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 440 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCEDFACEITLevel 10 · 2,060 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,060csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning61
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT6040Last 10060%Win rateWWLWWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +4.9pp headshot accuracy · −73ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 464ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 473ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 510ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility5.6
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels5.0
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning6.1
Utility5.6
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact9.4

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time505ms−140ms
first ⅓ avg 645ms → last ⅓ avg 505ms
Headshot accuracy22.1%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 23.9% → last ⅓ avg 22.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–3 · ancient, 12 May
57%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · mirage, 25 Jun
391msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · cache, 29 Aug
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 4 Jan

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W2Current streak
77In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 78% over 18mirageWeakest map · 27% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisS1814478%0.01
ancientS1713476%0.01
mirageD1541127%0.01
nukeA127558%-0.01
overpassC114736%-0.00
infernoS86275%-0.01
trainB84450%-0.02
cacheS64267%0.00
dust232167%0.01
vertigo110100%0.02
grail110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,728Matches
50%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
80.5ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient24857%1.0916.4
Anubis18050%1.0515.8
Nuke14754%1.0815.6
Inferno8249%1.0315.5
Overpass8156%1.1316.5
Mirage7139%1.0116.6
Train6755%1.1116.1
Cache3447%1.0415.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.3%Headshot accuracy
37.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.8%Spray accuracy
74.8%Counter-strafing
7.7°Preaim
506msReaction time
33.7%T opening success
59.8%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
8.84HE damage / grenade
9.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4527 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.7143% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–110.0118%5 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0116%31 Aug
mirage9–130.0221%30 Aug
anubis13–80.0923%30 Aug
cache13–80.0821%30 Aug
nuke0–13-0.1326%29 Aug
cache13–5-0.0040%29 Aug
vertigo25–210.0224%27 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0721%25 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0119%20 Aug
anubis13–80.0517%17 Aug
cache6–13-0.0323%16 Aug
cache13–60.0420%15 Aug
ancient13–100.0318%15 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0015%13 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0231%9 Aug
mirage2–130.058%7 Aug
ancient13–70.0222%5 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0212%5 Aug
mirage17–190.0318%6 Jul
anubis7–130.0433%22 Jun
dust211–130.0425%15 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0212%15 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0416%12 Jun
overpass13–50.0529%7 Jun
anubis13–3-0.0836%7 Jun
dust213–7-0.0418%5 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0325%5 Jun
ancient13–70.0220%2 Jun
anubis16–120.0218%1 Jun
cache16–12-0.0135%1 Jun
overpass13–10.1018%1 Jun
overpass10–130.0132%30 May
overpass13–110.1114%28 May
ancient11–130.0225%28 May
inferno13–110.0121%14 May
mirage3–13-0.0514%14 May
anubis13–40.0719%14 May
cache3–13-0.0629%14 May
nuke13–100.0434%13 May
ancient13–30.1216%12 May
anubis16–120.0426%27 Mar
overpass16–19-0.0410%23 Mar
nuke6–13-0.0213%20 Mar
mirage13–160.0323%3 Mar
anubis13–5-0.089%28 Feb
anubis13–10-0.0316%22 Feb
anubis13–90.1125%19 Feb
anubis13–90.0120%14 Feb
overpass7–13-0.0018%8 Feb
overpass10–13-0.0233%5 Feb
ancient19–15-0.0420%2 Feb
ancient16–120.0219%28 Jan
nuke13–50.0726%26 Jan
anubis13–9-0.0030%11 Jan
ancient7–13-0.0119%11 Jan
inferno13–40.027%10 Jan
anubis10–13-0.0124%10 Jan
train14–16-0.0424%9 Jan
ancient13–11-0.0128%7 Jan
overpass9–13-0.0034%4 Jan
ancient13–00.1224%4 Jan
mirage5–13-0.0739%30 Dec
train13–60.0315%17 Dec
inferno13–11-0.0124%10 Dec
mirage7–13-0.0115%5 Dec
dust213–40.0147%3 Dec
nuke13–8-0.078%2 Dec
mirage9–13-0.0015%3 Nov
mirage13–70.0819%1 Nov
ancient11–13-0.0220%27 Oct
mirage13–40.0812%26 Oct
ancient13–7-0.0417%26 Oct
train13–1-0.0319%26 Oct
nuke13–6-0.0320%26 Oct
overpass10–13-0.0517%26 Oct
train8–13-0.0526%25 Oct
inferno3–13-0.0613%24 Oct
mirage7–130.0224%21 Oct
nuke13–9-0.0321%20 Oct
ancient13–40.0021%15 Oct
ancient13–90.0121%13 Oct
nuke13–110.0928%13 Oct
train13–50.0222%12 Oct
train19–15-0.0520%12 Oct
overpass3–13-0.0911%21 Sept
train8–13-0.0332%14 Sept
train9–130.0238%3 Sept
overpass13–6-0.0730%18 Aug
mirage11–130.0130%6 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0419%5 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0157%25 Jun
inferno16–12-0.0124%23 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0250%21 Jun
nuke17–19-0.0318%26 May
mirage13–8-0.0640%22 May
ancient16–130.0129%19 May
nuke13–8-0.0115%19 May
inferno10–130.0422%10 May
grail13–6-0.0232%10 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →