K3NDOV

K3NDOV — CS2 Stats

GB76561198181731935[U:1:221466207]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,882Tracked matches40%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,336 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (17 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,336 → 1,336
+1Tracked matches · now 1,882
0.0ppWin rate · 40.0% → 40.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 57 days played since 19 Dec 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

13,957Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,336Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
57Days played since 2025-12-19

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,336
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 15 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGK3NDOVFACEITLevel 6 · 1,336 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPEAK ELO1,336csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning58
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50473Last 10050%Win rateWLWLWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +0.2pp headshot accuracy · −38ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 439ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 462ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 481ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility6.0
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch4.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 64% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning5.8
Utility6.0
Mechanics3.1
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact1.7

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time492ms−72ms
first ⅓ avg 564ms → last ⅓ avg 492ms
Headshot accuracy13.6%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 14.9% → last ⅓ avg 13.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–5 · ancient, 13 Jul
29%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · nuke, 4 Mar
344msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · ancient, 31 Aug
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 29 Dec

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
78In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 17cacheWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB25131252%0.01
nukeS1712571%0.03
ancientA148657%0.01
infernoB126650%0.03
dust2C125742%0.01
cacheD103730%-0.02
anubis4040%0.02
vertigo21150%0.04
overpass21150%-0.00
train21150%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

528Matches
49%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
71.5ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage11848%1.1314.0
Ancient10243%1.0915.3
Nuke8154%1.2014.2
Anubis7850%1.1014.2
Dust25838%1.0314.5
Inferno3863%1.5117.5
Vertigo1953%1.2916.8
Train1567%1.4415.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.7%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.6%Spray accuracy
63.9%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
494msReaction time
36.1%T opening success
55.0%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
3.4%Flash assists
7.11HE damage / grenade
15.52Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.7401% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4938 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.1221% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–70.0316%31 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0120%31 Aug
inferno13–60.0720%30 Aug
mirage5–130.0215%30 Aug
mirage13–50.018%30 Aug
mirage13–30.0918%30 Aug
ancient16–14-0.0210%25 Aug
dust26–13-0.029%20 Aug
vertigo5–130.0312%15 Aug
dust210–13-0.0312%15 Aug
overpass7–9-0.079%15 Aug
nuke9–30.0912%15 Aug
inferno9–40.108%15 Aug
mirage7–130.0114%13 Aug
dust28–130.0522%11 Aug
inferno4–130.0115%10 Aug
mirage9–130.0218%8 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0414%8 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0013%7 Aug
anubis9–130.0412%7 Aug
nuke7–130.0114%5 Aug
ancient13–90.0714%5 Aug
inferno13–90.0117%29 Jul
nuke13–60.1319%29 Jul
dust28–130.0318%20 Jul
ancient9–130.036%18 Jul
mirage13–30.0319%18 Jul
ancient22–19-0.0611%16 Jul
cache13–10-0.0414%16 Jul
mirage6–130.0315%15 Jul
cache7–130.0610%15 Jul
nuke10–13-0.017%13 Jul
ancient13–50.1710%13 Jul
dust211–130.0719%13 Jul
inferno10–130.0516%13 Jul
cache8–130.0110%9 Jul
nuke13–100.047%9 Jul
mirage11–130.0213%9 Jul
mirage11–130.0210%7 Jul
vertigo13–110.0515%7 Jul
dust213–80.0614%1 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0416%1 Jul
nuke13–3-0.0114%30 Jun
nuke13–9-0.027%30 Jun
mirage13–80.0314%27 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0217%27 Jun
nuke13–90.0511%26 Jun
inferno13–40.0721%22 Jun
nuke13–50.0414%18 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0513%18 Jun
mirage8–13-0.098%16 Jun
cache7–13-0.0821%12 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0622%12 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0017%12 Jun
overpass13–50.0720%11 Jun
mirage16–130.0313%11 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0614%10 Jun
cache13–90.0210%10 Jun
train13–100.0213%9 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0815%2 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0214%30 May
mirage5–130.0714%27 May
mirage13–70.0021%20 May
mirage16–140.018%15 May
nuke13–70.0618%15 May
ancient13–9-0.0111%5 May
ancient13–7-0.0117%5 May
anubis10–13-0.0110%4 May
anubis8–13-0.0214%4 May
cache7–13-0.0016%4 May
cache2–13-0.0518%4 May
cache6–13-0.0615%2 May
cache7–13-0.1321%30 Apr
cache13–80.0223%30 Apr
dust213–110.0316%21 Apr
inferno11–130.0017%21 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0515%1 Apr
mirage13–80.0019%5 Mar
mirage16–130.0313%5 Mar
nuke13–40.0529%4 Mar
mirage13–110.0217%4 Mar
nuke13–70.0113%4 Mar
dust213–11-0.075%25 Feb
ancient13–8-0.0111%18 Feb
dust210–13-0.0314%18 Feb
nuke13–6-0.007%2 Feb
anubis8–130.068%14 Jan
ancient13–100.0816%12 Jan
dust213–100.0412%12 Jan
inferno6–130.0422%9 Jan
inferno12–120.1119%8 Jan
nuke12–120.0511%5 Jan
mirage11–130.0113%3 Jan
train10–130.0215%1 Jan
mirage13–1-0.026%29 Dec
mirage13–40.0518%23 Dec
nuke13–80.0716%23 Dec
dust213–11-0.0223%22 Dec
dust212–120.0213%22 Dec
ancient9–13-0.036%19 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →