Val

Val — CS2 Stats

76561198178957349[U:1:218691621]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,149Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (46 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+7Tracked matches · now 1,149
+10.3ppWin rate · 31.0% → 41.4%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,720 +3,190 29 Jan – 16 Apr · 33 days played
22,53028,015peak 28,01529 Jan16 Apr
28,015Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,142Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
54Days played since 2025-11-07

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGValFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,142csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning46
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–51–2Last 10047%Win rateLLLWWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +5.1pp headshot accuracy · −17ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility6.7
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 562ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning4.6
Utility6.7
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time558ms−41ms
first ⅓ avg 599ms → last ⅓ avg 558ms
Headshot accuracy16.4%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 18.0% → last ⅓ avg 16.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–2 · nuke, 23 Sept →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · nuke, 22 Sept →
367msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · inferno, 5 Mar →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 23 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
6–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 58% over 19anubisWeakest map · 37% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2913–1645%-0.01
anubisC197–1237%-0.03
mirageA1911–858%-0.01
nukeB179–853%-0.01
ancientC73–443%-0.04
overpassA74–357%-0.02
cache—20–20%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,770Matches
51%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
77.6ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4255%0.9512.8
Nuke3453%0.9613.2
Anubis3361%1.0315.9
Inferno2767%0.9314.3
Ancient2654%0.9514.8
Overpass667%1.3414.0
Cache333%0.7311.7
Train250%0.529.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.8%Spray accuracy
81.5%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
562msReaction time
20.6%T opening success
40.9%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
7.5%Flash assists
10.79HE damage / grenade
10.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.5523% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke8–130.0215%27 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0416%27 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0822%23 Sept →
nuke13–20.1127%23 Sept →
anubis13–3-0.0213%22 Sept →
nuke13–3-0.0345%22 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0324%22 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0729%7 Aug →
inferno16–19-0.0513%19 Jun →
overpass13–8-0.0810%5 Jun →
mirage11–13-0.079%28 May →
anubis6–13-0.0521%23 May →
inferno13–9-0.0126%23 May →
inferno13–9-0.0129%16 May →
ancient13–40.0214%13 May →
anubis13–20.0813%4 May →
cache9–13-0.0114%4 May →
inferno10–13-0.0811%16 Apr →
anubis7–130.0114%8 Apr →
inferno15–15-0.0411%1 Apr →
nuke13–70.0415%30 Mar →
inferno9–13-0.028%29 Mar →
nuke8–13-0.0413%29 Mar →
nuke5–13-0.0911%27 Mar →
inferno11–13-0.0519%27 Mar →
nuke8–130.0120%27 Mar →
ancient10–13-0.0018%27 Mar →
anubis8–13-0.029%25 Mar →
mirage16–130.0213%25 Mar →
ancient13–7-0.063%25 Mar →
nuke9–13-0.0913%22 Mar →
inferno7–13-0.0113%22 Mar →
anubis9–13-0.0611%18 Mar →
overpass8–130.0010%16 Mar →
anubis5–130.0212%10 Mar →
mirage4–13-0.085%8 Mar →
mirage13–70.0510%8 Mar →
anubis3–13-0.1213%8 Mar →
overpass8–13-0.0510%7 Mar →
mirage13–11-0.0127%6 Mar →
anubis16–12-0.0016%6 Mar →
nuke16–14-0.0321%6 Mar →
mirage13–5-0.0110%5 Mar →
inferno13–50.0320%5 Mar →
mirage11–13-0.044%5 Mar →
inferno13–50.0020%5 Mar →
inferno9–13-0.069%3 Mar →
inferno11–130.0120%3 Mar →
mirage6–13-0.088%3 Mar →
inferno15–15-0.0521%28 Feb →
anubis5–13-0.1011%26 Feb →
anubis6–13-0.0617%19 Feb →
inferno13–90.039%19 Feb →
ancient5–13-0.109%19 Feb →
inferno13–8-0.0125%16 Feb →
inferno8–13-0.0326%12 Feb →
mirage11–13-0.0114%10 Feb →
nuke7–13-0.0919%10 Feb →
inferno13–11-0.0226%10 Feb →
overpass16–120.0510%9 Feb →
inferno8–13-0.0715%9 Feb →
inferno10–13-0.0215%8 Feb →
inferno4–130.0119%7 Feb →
mirage5–13-0.0015%7 Feb →
mirage6–13-0.0319%6 Feb →
nuke13–9-0.015%6 Feb →
mirage13–80.0324%6 Feb →
anubis13–11-0.0114%5 Feb →
anubis11–13-0.0415%5 Feb →
overpass13–70.0522%4 Feb →
inferno13–11-0.0526%4 Feb →
nuke13–8-0.0025%2 Feb →
inferno13–60.0832%1 Feb →
anubis11–130.0221%1 Feb →
mirage13–50.0017%31 Jan →
anubis13–2-0.0316%31 Jan →
overpass13–3-0.0614%30 Jan →
inferno3–13-0.0411%30 Jan →
anubis7–1-0.039%30 Jan →
mirage13–80.0216%30 Jan →
anubis13–11-0.0317%29 Jan →
inferno13–80.0520%29 Jan →
nuke10–13-0.0316%29 Jan →
mirage16–13-0.0613%28 Jan →
nuke16–12-0.0514%28 Jan →
inferno13–10-0.0125%27 Jan →
ancient10–130.0217%27 Jan →
inferno8–130.0226%26 Jan →
anubis8–130.0214%26 Jan →
mirage13–40.0519%25 Jan →
nuke9–13-0.0522%25 Jan →
anubis8–13-0.0818%22 Jan →
inferno13–9-0.0018%19 Jan →
nuke13–40.0320%19 Jan →
nuke13–90.0724%18 Jan →
ancient16–13-0.079%15 Jan →
mirage9–130.0320%15 Jan →
inferno13–50.1017%15 Jan →
overpass13–16-0.0715%4 Dec →
mirage13–70.0314%7 Nov →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.