sLem0n

sLem0n — CS2 Stats

NZ76561198177947738[U:1:217682010]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,545Tracked matches71%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,430Top 50% of 204,150 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#74651 of 251234 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 934 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Oct 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,430 +843 31 Aug – 4 Oct · 7 days played
19,58720,596peak 20,59631 Aug4 Oct
20,596Peak Premier in tracked matches
934Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-08-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 934
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 117 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-19
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-19

Premier CS Rating

  • 166 below peak (20,596)
  • +431 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,570 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-19
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-19

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsLem0nFACEITLevel 8 · 934 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER20,430 · Pink bandPEAK ELO934csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning54
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT59–37–4Last 10059%Win rateLWWWTWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +0.8pp headshot accuracy · +40ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Last 10

  • 7–2–1 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 582ms

Last 20

  • 11–7–2 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 562ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility5.3
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 569ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.4
Utility5.3
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels5.2
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time564ms+5ms
first ⅓ avg 559ms → last ⅓ avg 564ms
Headshot accuracy21.4%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 23.2% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–5 · mirage, 30 Aug →
62%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · mirage, 16 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · inferno, 31 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 3 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 71% over 17nukeWeakest map · 44% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2013–765%0.03
dust2B178–947%-0.00
infernoS1712–571%0.00
nukeC167–944%0.02
anubisA1610–663%-0.00
cacheB63–350%0.01
vertigo—31–233%-0.01
ancient—33–0100%-0.00
train—11–0100%-0.03
office—11–0100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,337Matches
49%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
72.9ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage14950%1.0414.7
Dust212147%0.9314.0
Inferno7658%1.0514.9
Nuke7148%1.0716.2
Ancient6052%1.0015.4
Anubis4461%0.9114.8
Cache4342%0.9715.1
Vertigo1155%0.9415.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.3%Headshot accuracy
36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.2%Spray accuracy
77.9%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
569msReaction time
54.3%T opening success
46.9%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
11.36HE damage / grenade
8.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4785 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke3–13-0.0926%8 Oct →
anubis13–40.0422%7 Oct →
dust213–30.0219%7 Oct →
inferno13–4-0.0417%6 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0228%6 Oct →
mirage19–17-0.0324%5 Oct →
inferno13–90.0523%5 Oct →
dust28–130.0226%5 Oct →
mirage13–60.0117%5 Oct →
dust213–20.0325%5 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0320%5 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0520%5 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0213%4 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0625%4 Oct →
anubis15–15-0.0029%4 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0425%4 Oct →
nuke13–60.0436%4 Oct →
inferno13–2-0.0212%3 Oct →
vertigo13–1-0.0419%3 Oct →
nuke13–00.0520%3 Oct →
dust213–40.0529%3 Oct →
anubis10–130.0624%2 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.036%2 Oct →
mirage13–110.0124%2 Oct →
train13–2-0.0319%2 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0126%2 Oct →
ancient13–10.0332%2 Oct →
dust213–80.0227%2 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0524%2 Oct →
dust216–13-0.0214%1 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0510%1 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.038%29 Sept →
cache13–70.0118%29 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0823%29 Sept →
dust210–130.0328%29 Sept →
inferno13–100.0523%29 Sept →
nuke10–130.0525%28 Sept →
inferno13–30.0727%28 Sept →
inferno13–60.0122%28 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0134%28 Sept →
cache13–90.0627%28 Sept →
anubis13–110.0119%27 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0431%26 Sept →
dust27–130.0219%26 Sept →
mirage6–130.0214%25 Sept →
mirage9–130.0126%24 Sept →
mirage13–100.0627%23 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0324%21 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0624%21 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0733%21 Sept →
mirage11–130.0321%20 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0116%18 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0326%17 Sept →
mirage13–80.0319%17 Sept →
mirage13–20.1020%17 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0462%16 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0315%16 Sept →
mirage13–30.1535%16 Sept →
mirage12–30.0530%15 Sept →
cache13–110.0924%14 Sept →
nuke19–17-0.0215%13 Sept →
dust26–130.0123%13 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0227%13 Sept →
vertigo11–130.0023%12 Sept →
nuke13–100.0216%11 Sept →
mirage16–120.0637%11 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0334%11 Sept →
mirage13–100.0419%10 Sept →
anubis22–190.0019%9 Sept →
nuke13–60.1722%9 Sept →
anubis16–12-0.0519%9 Sept →
office13–40.0718%9 Sept →
vertigo12–120.0238%9 Sept →
nuke13–30.118%9 Sept →
mirage2–50.0233%9 Sept →
inferno13–60.0325%9 Sept →
inferno13–80.0527%9 Sept →
anubis13–4-0.0324%7 Sept →
nuke13–90.0830%7 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.0421%6 Sept →
nuke10–130.0627%6 Sept →
anubis16–120.0525%4 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0129%3 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0126%3 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0710%31 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0110%31 Aug →
dust213–110.0529%31 Aug →
dust212–12-0.0421%31 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0123%31 Aug →
mirage13–50.1828%30 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0312%29 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0021%29 Aug →
anubis13–8-0.0317%28 Aug →
inferno13–50.0827%28 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0311%27 Aug →
anubis13–110.0924%26 Aug →
cache2–13-0.0544%26 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0321%25 Aug →
anubis13–90.0128%24 Aug →
nuke11–130.0130%24 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.