胸Bღღbs K

胸Bღღbs K — CS2 Stats

76561198176489453[U:1:216223725]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,879Tracked matches69%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,745Top 50% of 212,133 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#59325 of 259121 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,850 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,745 +4,236 28 Jul – 31 Oct · 38 days played
17,50921,773peak 21,77328 Jul31 Oct
21,909Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,850Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
52Days played since 2026-07-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,850
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 151 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-25
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-25

Premier CS Rating

  • 28 below peak (21,773)
  • +2,480 over 30 days · improving
  • +4,145 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,255 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-25
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-25

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG胸Bღღbs KFACEITLevel 8 · 1,850 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER21,745 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,850csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning72
Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY62–37–1Last 10062%Win rateWLWWWLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −3.4pp headshot accuracy · +20ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 617ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 607ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim6.2
Utility7.1
Positioning7.2
Opening Duels6.2
Clutch3.6

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 70% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 61% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 602ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning7.2
Utility7.1
Mechanics4.8
Opening Duels7.2
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time613ms+15ms
first ⅓ avg 599ms → last ⅓ avg 613ms
Headshot accuracy17.2%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 17.9% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.28Best match rating · 13–9 · cache, 20 Sept →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · cache, 26 Aug →
453msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · dust2, 12 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 5 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
5–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 76% over 17anubisWeakest map · 44% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2616–1062%0.02
infernoA2113–862%0.03
dust2S1713–476%0.01
anubisC94–544%-0.00
cacheS96–367%-0.00
nukeA95–456%-0.01
mirageA53–260%-0.04
poseidon—21–150%0.01
vertigo—11–0100%0.02
debris—10–10%-0.17

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,009Matches
50%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
81.5ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust238245%0.9415.2
Inferno38058%1.0215.9
Anubis28850%1.0115.2
Ancient28355%1.0616.2
Mirage20843%1.0415.6
Nuke20749%0.9915.8
Overpass11054%1.0016.1
Train4443%1.0716.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy
36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.0%Spray accuracy
71.6%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
602msReaction time
61.4%T opening success
56.5%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
9.00HE damage / grenade
15.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–7-0.0413%31 Oct →
anubis10–130.0212%29 Oct →
ancient13–50.0011%29 Oct →
ancient13–80.0320%26 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0016%25 Oct →
cache8–13-0.047%25 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0121%22 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0317%20 Oct →
poseidon5–9-0.0911%19 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0512%19 Oct →
dust213–100.0522%16 Oct →
inferno13–70.0713%16 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0312%15 Oct →
inferno13–90.1622%14 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0615%14 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0110%14 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0323%13 Oct →
ancient13–50.0110%13 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.0423%10 Oct →
cache13–80.0125%8 Oct →
dust213–30.0134%6 Oct →
dust213–80.1120%3 Oct →
dust216–130.0417%2 Oct →
ancient10–130.0217%1 Oct →
inferno13–50.0235%30 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0320%30 Sept →
dust215–150.0315%29 Sept →
dust213–70.0615%28 Sept →
vertigo13–100.0220%28 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0122%27 Sept →
nuke0–13-0.0410%27 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0612%24 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0115%24 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0612%23 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0119%22 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0719%21 Sept →
cache13–90.2814%20 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0032%19 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0413%18 Sept →
inferno13–20.0621%18 Sept →
nuke13–10.0314%16 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0122%16 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.076%16 Sept →
ancient13–50.1016%16 Sept →
dust213–90.0113%13 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.068%12 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.049%9 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0621%8 Sept →
ancient13–80.0616%7 Sept →
ancient13–90.0218%7 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0014%6 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0215%6 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0031%5 Sept →
cache3–13-0.076%5 Sept →
ancient4–130.0014%5 Sept →
inferno13–00.2223%5 Sept →
ancient13–110.1019%4 Sept →
inferno9–130.1223%4 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.055%3 Sept →
mirage13–80.027%3 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0218%29 Aug →
ancient13–60.0912%29 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0718%29 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0941%26 Aug →
anubis11–130.0017%24 Aug →
dust213–80.0422%24 Aug →
poseidon9–60.1121%23 Aug →
debris2–9-0.175%23 Aug →
ancient13–60.0221%23 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0115%23 Aug →
inferno13–30.1015%23 Aug →
dust216–13-0.0020%21 Aug →
inferno13–80.0118%21 Aug →
ancient8–130.0016%21 Aug →
nuke13–100.0518%20 Aug →
anubis13–90.0218%20 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0413%20 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.068%20 Aug →
cache13–8-0.0515%20 Aug →
ancient19–16-0.0115%17 Aug →
anubis10–130.0717%13 Aug →
dust213–50.0313%13 Aug →
anubis13–50.0210%13 Aug →
dust213–5-0.0021%12 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0511%12 Aug →
dust213–4-0.0331%12 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0227%6 Aug →
ancient13–90.0722%6 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0123%5 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0523%5 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0320%4 Aug →
mirage14–16-0.0615%4 Aug →
ancient10–130.0115%30 Jul →
nuke13–90.0129%30 Jul →
ancient8–130.1233%30 Jul →
inferno13–50.0417%30 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0318%28 Jul →
inferno13–90.009%28 Jul →
cache16–14-0.0319%28 Jul →
nuke4–130.0322%28 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.