dannymad

dannymad — CS2 Stats

76561198176330209[U:1:216064481]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

900Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,323Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,373 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 900 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 28 days played since 9 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,504 -3,495 9 May27 Jun · 10 days played
16,50419,999peak 19,9999 May27 Jun
Faceit ELO: 1,373 +0 22 Sept23 Sept · 2 observations
1,3731,373peak 1,37322 Sept23 Sept
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,373Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
28Days played since 2026-05-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,373
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 158 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-22
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-22

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,070), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate49.9%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy12.2%12.7%13.0%0.8% short
Kill/death ratio1.001.051.060.07 short
Match win rate44.4%45.7%46.3%1.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdannymadFACEITLevel 7 · 1,373 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,373csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning54
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47512Last 10047%Win rateLTWWLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · +0.6pp headshot accuracy · −41ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility5.4
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch2.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 612ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.4
Utility5.4
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time618ms−52ms
first ⅓ avg 670ms → last ⅓ avg 618ms
Headshot accuracy24.3%−4.3%
first ⅓ avg 28.6% → last ⅓ avg 24.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–4 · dust2, 23 May
48%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · dust2, 22 May
453msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · ancient, 30 May
13–2Biggest win · cache, 1 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
56In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 100% over 5infernoWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B26121446%0.02
mirageC2191243%0.01
ancientA159660%-0.01
anubisB136746%0.02
cacheD93633%0.00
infernoD82625%-0.02
overpassS550100%-0.00
nuke21150%0.00
vertigo1010%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

64,649Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
3,193Matches
44.4%Match win rate
49.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players
12.2%Shot accuracy
8,663MVPs
74,082Hours (in match)
2,377Bombs planted
666Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4724,120
AWP8,433
MAC-101,509
MP91,119
Knife990

Lifetime map wins

7,460dust2
3,598inferno
864cbble
589nuke
500vertigo
363lake
361train
48aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,066Matches
48%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
86.1ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage22748%1.1517.8
Dust215148%1.1517.1
Anubis13846%1.1917.6
Ancient12649%1.2017.9
Inferno5949%1.0114.7
Nuke2832%0.9215.0
Overpass1953%1.0717.6
Cache1164%1.3819.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.8%Headshot accuracy
34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.3%Spray accuracy
78.0%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
612msReaction time
35.8%T opening success
52.9%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
10.96HE damage / grenade
10.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.7695% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache7–13-0.0643%18 Sept
mirage15–15-0.0117%11 Sept
dust213–8-0.0214%10 Sept
nuke13–60.0223%21 Aug
cache5–130.0230%16 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0720%27 Jun
dust213–70.0329%27 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0719%27 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0321%13 Jun
dust29–13-0.0328%13 Jun
anubis10–130.1232%13 Jun
dust213–10-0.0421%12 Jun
mirage13–70.0730%12 Jun
dust213–70.1325%12 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0127%12 Jun
dust222–190.0027%12 Jun
anubis19–17-0.0027%12 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0219%12 Jun
dust210–130.0114%12 Jun
inferno13–110.0216%9 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0420%9 Jun
overpass13–8-0.0225%9 Jun
anubis14–16-0.0326%9 Jun
cache12–160.0125%8 Jun
ancient11–130.0125%8 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0127%7 Jun
inferno13–50.1225%7 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0116%7 Jun
ancient16–130.0027%4 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0515%4 Jun
dust28–13-0.0131%4 Jun
mirage16–140.0330%1 Jun
dust29–130.0928%1 Jun
cache13–3-0.0521%1 Jun
cache13–20.0221%1 Jun
ancient13–90.0319%1 Jun
dust213–60.0434%30 May
mirage10–13-0.0420%30 May
ancient13–80.0233%30 May
mirage11–130.0020%30 May
dust210–130.0022%29 May
mirage13–70.1332%29 May
nuke8–13-0.0224%28 May
anubis22–20-0.0226%26 May
inferno4–13-0.0538%26 May
ancient13–80.0220%26 May
mirage4–130.0321%25 May
anubis16–120.0922%24 May
mirage9–13-0.0036%24 May
ancient13–7-0.0121%24 May
dust211–130.0344%23 May
vertigo12–120.0326%23 May
mirage4–13-0.0631%23 May
dust210–130.0330%23 May
mirage5–13-0.0019%23 May
mirage5–130.0323%23 May
mirage9–13-0.0123%23 May
mirage13–70.1028%23 May
dust213–40.1739%23 May
dust213–90.0324%23 May
ancient16–13-0.0220%22 May
cache10–130.0231%22 May
ancient13–20.0326%22 May
dust213–80.0248%22 May
inferno9–13-0.0124%22 May
overpass13–8-0.0221%22 May
dust213–90.0235%22 May
anubis10–13-0.0533%22 May
anubis13–70.0342%22 May
ancient9–13-0.0638%21 May
ancient6–13-0.0628%20 May
mirage13–20.0333%20 May
dust26–13-0.0521%20 May
mirage10–13-0.088%20 May
dust28–13-0.0523%20 May
dust29–13-0.0635%20 May
cache13–50.0223%13 May
cache11–130.1136%13 May
cache1–13-0.070%13 May
dust213–40.1024%13 May
dust27–13-0.0144%12 May
overpass13–8-0.0337%12 May
inferno8–13-0.0217%12 May
ancient11–130.0520%12 May
overpass9–50.0432%12 May
anubis13–20.0545%12 May
ancient10–130.0223%11 May
dust27–13-0.0128%11 May
mirage13–160.0129%11 May
dust213–40.0124%11 May
anubis10–13-0.0335%11 May
inferno16–19-0.0547%10 May
dust26–13-0.0424%10 May
dust210–13-0.0219%10 May
mirage13–110.0123%10 May
mirage13–90.0133%10 May
mirage10–00.0646%10 May
overpass13–50.0124%9 May
anubis12–16-0.0124%9 May
anubis13–100.0927%9 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →