Taboozle

Taboozle — CS2 Stats

ZA76561198175995982[U:1:215730254]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,048Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,747Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating18,941Top 50% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~12.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#87675 of 224852 tracked
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,048 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 35 days played since 11 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,941 -6,241 11 May10 Sept · 30 days played
18,52426,550peak 26,55011 May10 Sept
26,693Peak Premier in tracked matches
35Days played since 2026-05-11

Premier CS Rating

  • 7,609 below peak (26,550)
  • +417 over 30 days · improving
  • -5,827 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,059 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 10 Sep 2026 and 18 Sep 2026.

Measured 10 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; previous 6 Sep 2026 → 10 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=5,197), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate56.2%41.3%41.9%above
Shot accuracy15.0%12.7%12.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.340.960.98above
Match win rate42.4%42.5%43.3%0.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTaboozleFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER18,941 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning50
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53425Last 10053%Win rateWLWLWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −6.6pp headshot accuracy · +2ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 526ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 613ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 611ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility6.8
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels3.3

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 92% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 607ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.0
Utility6.8
Mechanics9.4
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time609ms−58ms
first ⅓ avg 667ms → last ⅓ avg 609ms
Headshot accuracy30.2%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 28.2% → last ⅓ avg 30.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–4 · ancient, 27 May
52%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · dust2, 8 Jul
422msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · mirage, 21 Jul
13–3Biggest win · cache, 25 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
611In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 78% over 9infernoWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C31131842%0.01
mirageA27171063%0.01
ancientB126650%0.01
infernoD93633%0.00
nukeS97278%0.02
cacheA74357%-0.00
anubis31233%0.03
overpass220100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

174,986Lifetime kills
1.34K/D · Top 10% of Level 2 players
6,538Matches
42.4%Match win rate
56.2%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 2 players
15.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 2 players
15,661MVPs
6,747Hours (in match)
5,542Bombs planted
2,067Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4758,255
AWP20,629
SSG 0811,347
P2502,941
MP92,848
FAMAS2,422

Lifetime map wins

25,511dust2
6,935inferno
2,596nuke
1,486vertigo
1,361train
279cbble
161lake
52office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

8Matches
38%Win rate
0.70Avg K/D
ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

30.0%Headshot accuracy
36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.7%Spray accuracy
92.4%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
607msReaction time
37.9%T opening success
42.5%CT opening success
0.75Enemies flashed / flash
9.0%Flash assists
13.49HE damage / grenade
9.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.8557% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–11-0.0322%2 Sept
cache11–130.0317%17 Aug
dust213–80.0131%17 Aug
ancient10–130.0221%17 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0129%17 Aug
dust211–130.0021%26 Jul
anubis5–130.0922%26 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0223%25 Jul
cache13–30.0922%25 Jul
cache13–9-0.0132%25 Jul
cache13–50.0238%25 Jul
mirage13–80.0630%25 Jul
dust213–30.0628%25 Jul
mirage15–150.0335%24 Jul
mirage13–30.0935%24 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0639%23 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0535%21 Jul
mirage1–13-0.098%9 Jul
cache13–8-0.0021%9 Jul
mirage13–100.0936%9 Jul
dust210–130.0435%9 Jul
cache10–130.0015%9 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0324%9 Jul
dust211–13-0.0444%8 Jul
nuke13–110.0840%8 Jul
mirage13–70.0436%8 Jul
cache2–13-0.1533%8 Jul
dust25–13-0.0452%8 Jul
inferno12–12-0.0626%7 Jul
inferno13–90.0346%7 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0142%6 Jul
overpass13–50.0624%6 Jul
mirage13–40.0833%6 Jul
nuke14–16-0.0136%4 Jul
inferno13–40.1137%4 Jul
mirage13–60.0328%4 Jul
anubis8–130.0331%4 Jul
dust29–130.0418%4 Jul
nuke13–60.0126%4 Jul
inferno13–100.0419%29 Jun
dust212–160.0421%27 Jun
mirage1–13-0.0422%27 Jun
mirage13–60.0840%26 Jun
mirage5–130.0133%26 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0226%23 Jun
mirage16–13-0.0017%23 Jun
ancient11–130.0126%23 Jun
dust213–60.0438%23 Jun
mirage13–60.0334%23 Jun
dust211–130.0521%23 Jun
nuke16–130.0247%22 Jun
ancient11–130.0420%22 Jun
ancient13–70.0423%22 Jun
dust24–130.0029%22 Jun
dust213–30.0543%20 Jun
dust213–40.0042%19 Jun
dust23–13-0.0931%19 Jun
dust213–50.1132%18 Jun
inferno3–13-0.1029%18 Jun
ancient10–130.0139%18 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0533%17 Jun
nuke13–80.0921%17 Jun
mirage13–80.0251%16 Jun
dust213–70.0739%16 Jun
dust24–13-0.0741%16 Jun
inferno8–130.1226%15 Jun
overpass13–11-0.0425%15 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0717%14 Jun
ancient16–130.0115%14 Jun
dust211–130.0035%14 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0325%8 Jun
dust213–50.0621%8 Jun
dust215–15-0.0619%8 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0226%31 May
mirage4–13-0.0025%30 May
dust213–11-0.0514%30 May
anubis13–6-0.0330%30 May
dust211–13-0.0135%27 May
dust213–7-0.0141%27 May
ancient13–40.1427%27 May
dust213–80.0131%21 May
dust213–80.0022%21 May
dust26–13-0.0029%21 May
mirage13–10-0.0421%20 May
mirage13–90.0029%20 May
nuke11–130.0426%16 May
ancient13–8-0.0122%15 May
mirage16–13-0.0335%15 May
dust215–150.0530%15 May
ancient13–9-0.0229%15 May
dust213–90.0536%14 May
mirage13–80.0431%14 May
nuke13–7-0.0224%14 May
inferno10–13-0.0146%14 May
mirage3–130.0226%14 May
dust215–15-0.0144%13 May
dust210–13-0.0124%13 May
mirage7–130.0041%13 May
mirage8–13-0.0024%11 May
dust210–130.0430%11 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →