Chik3N

Chik3N — CS2 Stats

US76561198173277115[U:1:213011387]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,362Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating21,337Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#57543 of 222427 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,501 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 41 days played since 23 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,337 -174 23 Jun16 Sept · 22 days played
16,61421,511peak 21,51123 Jun16 Sept
21,863Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,501Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-06-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,501
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 30 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4

Premier CS Rating

  • 174 below peak (21,511)
  • +2,965 over 30 days · improving
  • -174 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,663 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGChik3NFACEITLevel 7 · 1,501 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER21,337 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,501csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning44
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT57403Last 10057%Win rateLWWWWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +3.3pp headshot accuracy · −25ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Last 10

  • 82 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 20

  • 146 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 565ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim6.5
Utility4.0
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch3.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 99% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 573ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning4.4
Utility4.0
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact9.0

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time567ms+12ms
first ⅓ avg 555ms → last ⅓ avg 567ms
Headshot accuracy22.0%−3.9%
first ⅓ avg 25.9% → last ⅓ avg 22.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 4–0 · dust2, 3 Sept
63%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · nuke, 25 Aug
359msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · dust2, 2 Sept
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 24 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
108In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 71% over 7anubisWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA30191163%0.02
dust2A26151158%0.03
anubisC104640%-0.01
infernoC104640%0.00
ancientS96367%0.02
cacheS75271%0.03
nukeC73443%-0.00
overpass110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,070Matches
51%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
79.7ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage18451%1.0515.1
Dust213248%1.0615.9
Anubis7751%0.9714.5
Inferno7049%1.1015.9
Ancient6055%1.0416.2
Nuke4661%1.0515.2
Train1540%1.1517.3
Overpass1155%0.8813.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.5%Headshot accuracy
30.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.4%Spray accuracy
78.8%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
573msReaction time
42.6%T opening success
40.8%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
3.5%Flash assists
8.47HE damage / grenade
4.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4437 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust25–13-0.0127%16 Sept
cache13–20.0528%16 Sept
mirage16–14-0.0023%16 Sept
cache13–60.0128%16 Sept
ancient13–7-0.0023%14 Sept
dust213–10.0519%13 Sept
anubis13–4-0.079%13 Sept
dust219–170.0829%12 Sept
mirage13–70.1023%12 Sept
nuke9–130.0226%11 Sept
dust213–80.1019%11 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0321%11 Sept
dust26–13-0.0313%10 Sept
dust213–110.0127%10 Sept
anubis6–130.0825%8 Sept
anubis2–6-0.0917%8 Sept
nuke13–8-0.0119%8 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0022%8 Sept
mirage13–60.0319%8 Sept
dust213–16-0.0020%8 Sept
cache11–130.0425%8 Sept
mirage15–15-0.0111%7 Sept
ancient13–30.0816%7 Sept
dust213–70.1129%6 Sept
cache6–13-0.0320%5 Sept
dust216–130.0212%5 Sept
ancient12–16-0.0216%4 Sept
nuke3–13-0.0731%4 Sept
mirage13–4-0.0524%3 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0526%3 Sept
dust24–00.1943%3 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0516%3 Sept
mirage9–130.0321%3 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0136%3 Sept
mirage9–10.0518%3 Sept
dust213–10-0.0133%3 Sept
mirage2–13-0.1622%3 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0220%3 Sept
dust28–13-0.0120%3 Sept
dust213–4-0.0346%2 Sept
cache13–40.0429%2 Sept
mirage8–00.0642%2 Sept
dust216–140.0530%2 Sept
nuke13–40.0026%2 Sept
inferno13–110.0224%2 Sept
anubis13–20.1630%2 Sept
dust213–100.0343%2 Sept
mirage13–70.0426%1 Sept
dust27–13-0.0420%1 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0528%28 Aug
mirage13–80.0332%28 Aug
mirage10–130.0326%25 Aug
anubis13–4-0.0117%25 Aug
nuke13–50.0963%25 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0130%18 Aug
mirage13–90.1734%18 Aug
ancient13–110.0718%18 Aug
dust213–50.0531%18 Aug
dust26–13-0.0331%17 Aug
inferno13–70.0130%17 Aug
dust213–60.0835%16 Aug
inferno10–130.0216%15 Aug
mirage13–50.0552%15 Aug
dust213–16-0.0430%14 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0518%14 Aug
anubis2–13-0.1033%14 Aug
ancient13–110.0120%13 Aug
mirage13–50.0230%13 Aug
cache13–50.0442%9 Aug
mirage5–130.0938%8 Aug
dust20–60.000%1 Aug
cache13–80.0832%30 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0536%30 Jul
mirage13–80.0525%29 Jul
mirage15–150.0217%28 Jul
inferno1–13-0.0422%28 Jul
dust213–30.0932%25 Jul
inferno13–20.0231%25 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0414%24 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0220%24 Jul
inferno13–00.1423%24 Jul
mirage15–150.0328%23 Jul
anubis13–60.0126%23 Jul
mirage13–110.0529%23 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0714%23 Jul
dust26–13-0.0214%21 Jul
dust213–30.1226%21 Jul
mirage11–130.0535%18 Jul
ancient10–130.0422%17 Jul
ancient13–60.1015%14 Jul
mirage8–130.0245%12 Jul
dust27–130.0036%10 Jul
dust214–16-0.0222%30 Jun
mirage13–110.0823%27 Jun
mirage13–70.0224%27 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0133%26 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0425%23 Jun
mirage13–60.0141%23 Jun
overpass8–2-0.0229%23 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0610%23 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →