GarrettPictures — CS2 Stats

76561198171273277[U:1:211007549]Steam profile ↗

6,163Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating21,398Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#10140 of 30793 tracked

FaceitLevel 8 · 1,716 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78

Positioning37

Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–38–6Last 10056%Win rateWWLLLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.8

Aggression3.7

Utility5.0

Positioning3.7

Opening Duels0.8

Clutch2.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 41 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 624ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8

Positioning3.7

Utility5.0

Mechanics6.3

Opening Duels1.6

Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time616ms+15ms

first ⅓ avg 601ms → last ⅓ avg 616ms

Headshot accuracy28.5%+6.2%

first ⅓ avg 22.2% → last ⅓ avg 28.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — nuke 9–0

13–1Biggest win — inferno

5Longest win streak

W2Current streak

9–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 75% over 12dust2Weakest map · 27% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	15	9–6	60%	-0.00
nuke	B	13	7–6	54%	0.01
cache	S	12	9–3	75%	0.02
dust2	D	11	3–8	27%	-0.01
inferno	C	10	4–6	40%	-0.04
poseidon	S	10	7–3	70%	-0.01
debris	S	9	6–3	67%	0.06
eldorado	B	8	4–4	50%	0.01
anubis	A	8	5–3	63%	0.03
ancient	—	2	1–1	50%	0.05
train	—	2	1–1	50%	0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,517Matches

50%Win rate

1.11Avg K/D

76.2ADR

47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win

26%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	258	53%	1.12	16.6
Anubis	91	49%	1.00	15.8
Inferno	85	51%	1.03	15.9
Ancient	76	50%	0.94	14.9
Nuke	47	51%	1.02	16.6
Train	35	43%	1.06	16.8
Dust2	25	40%	0.97	16.7
Overpass	15	40%	0.92	13.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.7%Headshot accuracy

36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

41.5%Spray accuracy

78.2%Counter-strafing

10.6°Preaim

624msReaction time

23.8%T opening success

42.7%CT opening success

0.53Enemies flashed / flash

6.4%Flash assists

7.01HE damage / grenade

9.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 23.8307% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	16–14	-0.04	19%	29 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.01	18%	29 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	30%	29 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.07	30%	29 Aug →
nuke	13–16	-0.06	44%	29 Aug →
eldorado	9–5	0.07	56%	28 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.12	41%	28 Aug →
inferno	1–13	-0.07	43%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.02	23%	27 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.08	26%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.09	33%	27 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.01	30%	27 Aug →
cache	14–16	-0.04	20%	26 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.04	40%	26 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.03	26%	26 Aug →
mirage	1–8	-0.02	26%	26 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.01	30%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.02	22%	25 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.02	24%	25 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	26%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.06	15%	24 Aug →
anubis	13–3	-0.00	36%	24 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.02	21%	24 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	20%	24 Aug →
cache	5–13	0.01	39%	23 Aug →
poseidon	5–9	-0.03	39%	23 Aug →
debris	9–2	0.08	27%	23 Aug →
poseidon	9–1	-0.07	28%	23 Aug →
poseidon	4–9	-0.04	22%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.06	20%	23 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.01	29%	23 Aug →
eldorado	3–9	-0.10	21%	23 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.08	13%	23 Aug →
mirage	15–15	0.00	22%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.05	19%	23 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.03	19%	22 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.06	19%	22 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.04	22%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.01	13%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.01	36%	21 Aug →
inferno	3–9	-0.06	15%	20 Aug →
eldorado	4–9	0.03	57%	20 Aug →
debris	9–0	0.13	27%	20 Aug →
mirage	9–1	0.07	26%	20 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.05	19%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–1	0.02	41%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.03	47%	20 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.03	30%	20 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.02	32%	20 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.04	21%	19 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.08	21%	19 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.07	32%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.02	28%	17 Aug →
poseidon	9–4	-0.04	11%	16 Aug →
poseidon	5–9	-0.16	26%	16 Aug →
eldorado	9–5	0.03	7%	16 Aug →
debris	8–8	0.07	17%	16 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.03	10%	16 Aug →
inferno	7–9	0.03	29%	15 Aug →
nuke	9–6	-0.09	35%	15 Aug →
poseidon	9–4	0.13	37%	15 Aug →
debris	8–8	0.03	42%	15 Aug →
eldorado	9–4	0.15	27%	15 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.01	26%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.03	27%	15 Aug →
cache	16–14	0.05	27%	15 Aug →
mirage	16–12	0.03	18%	15 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.07	21%	15 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.06	26%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.07	27%	15 Aug →
debris	9–7	0.19	29%	14 Aug →
poseidon	9–3	0.07	21%	14 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	14%	14 Aug →
nuke	9–0	0.22	40%	13 Aug →
inferno	9–5	-0.14	19%	13 Aug →
eldorado	9–7	0.04	20%	13 Aug →
poseidon	9–5	-0.07	6%	13 Aug →
debris	9–5	-0.03	9%	13 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.03	19%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.06	18%	13 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.01	13%	13 Aug →
ancient	6–13	0.02	25%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.11	29%	13 Aug →
poseidon	9–7	-0.06	15%	12 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.07	33%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.00	15%	12 Aug →
train	13–8	0.17	21%	12 Aug →
train	6–13	0.04	28%	12 Aug →
eldorado	3–9	-0.13	21%	11 Aug →
debris	9–7	-0.08	33%	11 Aug →
debris	8–8	-0.02	14%	11 Aug →
debris	9–3	0.18	22%	11 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	16%	11 Aug →
poseidon	9–4	0.13	25%	11 Aug →
inferno	5–9	-0.19	30%	10 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.00	32%	10 Aug →
eldorado	8–8	-0.04	26%	9 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.03	27%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.02	27%	9 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.07	10%	9 Aug →