- 𝓣𝓪𝔁𝓮𝓷$ — CS2 Stats

SE76561198170807901[U:1:210542173]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,177Tracked matches47%Win rate2021Tracked since

3,186Hours in CS

CSDB Rating5.9 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating25,004Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#3400 of 25213 tracked

FaceitLevel 8 · 1,589 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,146), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 8 median	Level 9 median	vs Level 9
Headshot rate	40.8%	47.2%	49.0%	8.2% short
Shot accuracy	15.1%	12.3%	13.1%	above
Kill/death ratio	0.82	1.07	1.08	0.26 short
Match win rate	42.6%	46.3%	46.9%	4.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81

Positioning50

Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT47–53Last 10047%Win rateWLLWWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.1

Aggression6.9

Utility3.8

Positioning5.0

Opening Duels2.4

Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 565ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1

Positioning5.0

Utility3.8

Mechanics6.6

Opening Duels2.4

Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time572ms−47ms

first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 572ms

Headshot accuracy18.8%+1.3%

first ⅓ avg 17.5% → last ⅓ avg 18.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — mirage 13–2

13–1Biggest win — dust2

6Longest win streak

5–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 60% over 20anubisWeakest map · 31% over 13

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	21	11–10	52%	-0.03
mirage	A	20	12–8	60%	0.01
ancient	D	19	6–13	32%	0.00
anubis	D	13	4–9	31%	-0.02
cache	A	10	6–4	60%	0.01
vertigo	A	5	3–2	60%	-0.04
nuke	C	5	2–3	40%	0.02
inferno	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.02
overpass	—	3	2–1	67%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

131,929Lifetime kills

0.82K/D

7,855Matches

42.6%Match win rate

40.8%Headshot %

15.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players

19,379MVPs

3,186Hours (in match)

6,176Bombs planted

1,396Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4752,476

M4A4 / M4A1-S29,571

Knife8,669

P2000 / USP-S6,488

Glock-185,228

AWP5,174

Galil AR4,644

Desert Eagle4,189

Five-SeveN3,438

FAMAS3,332

Lifetime map wins

14,875vertigo

8,057dust2

7,868inferno

3,223nuke

1,058train

480cbble

171office

42assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,189Matches

49%Win rate

0.93Avg K/D

73.2ADR

45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

19%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	291	49%	0.96	14.9
Ancient	192	54%	0.96	13.9
Dust2	148	38%	0.85	13.1
Anubis	112	45%	1.01	14.4
Inferno	102	47%	0.88	13.2
Nuke	64	47%	0.93	15.3
Overpass	49	55%	0.97	15.3
Vertigo	41	39%	0.99	15.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.0%Headshot accuracy

38.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

42.4%Spray accuracy

79.5%Counter-strafing

9.3°Preaim

565msReaction time

30.3%T opening success

48.9%CT opening success

0.44Enemies flashed / flash

3.4%Flash assists

6.19HE damage / grenade

4.82Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4416 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 30.3373% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–9	0.05	20%	28 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.02	22%	24 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.05	25%	24 Aug →
vertigo	8–0	-0.11	43%	24 Aug →
vertigo	13–11	-0.06	7%	24 Aug →
vertigo	13–6	-0.02	26%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.03	28%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.03	17%	8 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.02	15%	8 Aug →
vertigo	11–13	0.02	11%	6 Aug →
anubis	1–13	-0.06	15%	6 Aug →
ancient	2–13	-0.06	15%	5 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.02	20%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–16	-0.06	12%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.05	16%	4 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.12	15%	4 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.07	19%	4 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.07	13%	26 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.00	33%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–16	0.02	18%	25 Jul →
anubis	14–16	0.00	17%	25 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.08	14%	21 Jul →
ancient	9–13	0.04	14%	21 Jul →
anubis	14–16	-0.07	14%	20 Jul →
dust2	16–14	0.02	22%	19 Jul →
anubis	16–12	0.03	10%	19 Jul →
anubis	14–16	-0.07	7%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	16%	19 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.00	26%	19 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.07	38%	19 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.06	18%	19 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.09	14%	19 Jul →
dust2	16–13	0.03	22%	19 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.00	16%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.01	15%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.05	17%	18 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.06	26%	18 Jul →
mirage	5–13	0.00	23%	18 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.12	38%	18 Jul →
inferno	3–13	-0.00	21%	18 Jul →
mirage	8–1	0.03	15%	18 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.02	14%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.04	13%	15 Jul →
dust2	16–13	-0.04	18%	14 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.01	13%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.02	16%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.02	11%	14 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.05	24%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–6	-0.07	11%	10 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.00	19%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.06	25%	10 Jul →
ancient	3–13	-0.07	15%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–1	-0.02	27%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.09	10%	6 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.06	19%	5 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.00	17%	5 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.00	21%	5 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.03	15%	4 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	17%	4 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.11	12%	3 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.04	13%	3 Jul →
ancient	7–13	0.06	29%	3 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	23%	3 Jul →
overpass	13–1	-0.00	15%	3 Jul →
ancient	3–13	-0.00	26%	3 Jul →
overpass	4–13	-0.04	10%	1 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.04	18%	28 Jun →
mirage	13–10	-0.00	32%	28 Jun →
ancient	11–13	-0.02	7%	28 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.06	20%	28 Jun →
mirage	13–5	-0.03	3%	27 Jun →
nuke	11–13	-0.01	22%	27 Jun →
ancient	11–13	-0.07	6%	27 Jun →
mirage	6–13	-0.07	23%	27 Jun →
inferno	13–9	-0.02	10%	27 Jun →
cache	4–13	-0.09	19%	15 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	5%	14 Jun →
anubis	9–13	-0.01	22%	10 Jun →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	18%	8 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.01	22%	6 Jun →
cache	13–3	0.03	29%	5 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.02	18%	5 Jun →
ancient	10–13	-0.07	27%	2 Jun →
mirage	13–2	0.12	14%	31 May →
nuke	8–13	-0.01	21%	29 May →
nuke	13–6	0.04	21%	29 May →
ancient	13–9	0.00	13%	28 May →
anubis	1–13	-0.05	24%	24 May →
mirage	13–8	0.06	20%	24 May →
mirage	3–13	0.06	13%	20 May →
dust2	10–13	-0.08	12%	15 May →
ancient	13–7	0.02	17%	14 May →
ancient	13–4	0.03	12%	13 May →
vertigo	7–13	-0.04	15%	8 May →
mirage	7–13	0.01	18%	8 May →
dust2	5–13	-0.07	18%	8 May →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	24%	3 May →
mirage	4–13	-0.06	23%	3 May →
ancient	7–13	-0.03	15%	29 Apr →
overpass	13–11	0.07	18%	27 Apr →