FSGCCR

FSGCCR — CS2 Stats

VG76561198170031050[U:1:209765322]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

704Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,284Hours in CS9Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,078 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,078 → 1,078
+3Tracked matches · now 704
0.0ppWin rate · 46.7% → 46.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 44 days played since 18 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,208 +2,407 18 May5 Jul · 17 days played
18,80122,394peak 22,39418 May5 Jul
Faceit ELO: 1,078 +0 30 Aug15 Sept · 5 observations
1,0781,078peak 1,07830 Aug15 Sept
22,498Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,078Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2026-05-18

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,078
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 123 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches53+2
Win rate40%33%+7pp
K/D1.001.10−0.10
Headshot %47%42%+4pp

Measured 15 Sep 202621 Sep 2026; previous 6 Sep 2026 → 15 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,417), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate34.5%43.8%44.8%10.3% short
Shot accuracy12.2%12.0%12.4%0.3% short
Kill/death ratio0.961.021.040.07 short
Match win rate45.0%44.7%45.2%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFSGCCRFACEITLevel 5 · 1,078 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPEAK ELO1,078csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning61
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43552Last 10043%Win rateLLWWLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −6.5pp headshot accuracy · +2ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 533ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 532ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility5.4
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch5.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning6.1
Utility5.4
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time548ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 562ms → last ⅓ avg 548ms
Headshot accuracy22.3%−1.2%
first ⅓ avg 23.4% → last ⅓ avg 22.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–4 · anubis, 18 May
58%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · overpass, 30 May
391msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · anubis, 27 Jun
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 20 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
810In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 56% over 18overpassWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB21101148%0.01
anubisA1810856%0.02
dust2B157847%-0.00
mirageD1331023%0.02
nukeB105550%-0.02
infernoB105550%-0.01
cacheD62433%-0.01
overpassD61517%-0.02
vertigo1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

51,623Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
2,681Matches
45.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
34.5%Headshot %
12.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
7,032MVPs
1,213Hours (in match)
3,671Bombs planted
1,366Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

7,657dust2
3,964inferno
2,462nuke
475train
369cbble
353vertigo
86office
85lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

249Matches
52%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
78.1ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient5646%1.0915.9
Mirage4457%1.0414.4
Dust23355%1.1316.9
Anubis3155%1.0816.2
Inferno2662%1.2216.7
Nuke2264%0.9313.9
Overpass633%1.4422.0
Vertigo633%0.8213.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.8%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.0%Spray accuracy
83.2%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
542msReaction time
29.3%T opening success
53.4%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
9.9%Flash assists
5.89HE damage / grenade
13.96Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4904 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.278% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategyOverpass grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust211–13-0.0025%7 Sept
anubis4–13-0.0429%7 Sept
ancient13–60.1028%3 Sept
ancient13–80.0015%2 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0013%1 Sept
nuke22–19-0.049%30 Aug
anubis3–13-0.046%30 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0911%26 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0219%26 Aug
anubis16–120.0524%26 Aug
cache11–13-0.0022%25 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0518%23 Aug
dust27–13-0.0833%14 Aug
inferno13–80.0926%14 Aug
cache11–13-0.027%13 Aug
dust210–130.0832%9 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0524%9 Aug
dust27–13-0.0628%28 Jul
anubis13–40.0824%27 Jul
dust213–90.1229%26 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0120%24 Jul
inferno8–8-0.1222%20 Jul
cache13–60.0529%19 Jul
inferno13–30.0823%18 Jul
anubis13–110.0033%18 Jul
ancient10–130.0524%18 Jul
cache6–130.0229%18 Jul
anubis13–80.0621%17 Jul
ancient9–130.0233%12 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0214%12 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0016%5 Jul
inferno13–40.0220%5 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0129%5 Jul
overpass2–13-0.0233%3 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0116%28 Jun
ancient13–60.1323%28 Jun
inferno3–130.0016%28 Jun
anubis13–110.0019%27 Jun
nuke4–130.0016%26 Jun
nuke14–16-0.0134%26 Jun
ancient16–140.0220%25 Jun
anubis10–130.029%25 Jun
inferno2–13-0.0319%23 Jun
nuke13–10-0.024%23 Jun
overpass13–11-0.0412%23 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0226%20 Jun
ancient13–60.0614%20 Jun
inferno13–5-0.0017%20 Jun
anubis13–20.1115%20 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0626%20 Jun
dust213–100.0113%20 Jun
anubis13–10-0.0328%20 Jun
mirage13–16-0.0419%17 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0418%17 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0717%16 Jun
dust25–13-0.0423%16 Jun
anubis4–130.0331%15 Jun
cache6–13-0.0633%15 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0329%14 Jun
nuke13–5-0.0223%14 Jun
dust23–13-0.0819%14 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0010%7 Jun
mirage8–130.0921%6 Jun
dust216–13-0.0213%6 Jun
inferno16–12-0.0215%6 Jun
ancient13–90.0120%6 Jun
anubis11–130.0228%2 Jun
dust23–130.0439%2 Jun
mirage13–90.0321%2 Jun
dust213–8-0.0421%2 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0022%2 Jun
mirage12–120.0034%31 May
nuke13–16-0.0522%31 May
inferno8–13-0.0412%30 May
dust216–130.0120%30 May
overpass2–13-0.089%30 May
cache13–7-0.0528%30 May
vertigo4–13-0.0413%30 May
overpass10–13-0.0158%30 May
anubis8–130.0421%25 May
ancient9–130.0118%25 May
ancient4–13-0.0730%25 May
dust211–130.0116%25 May
ancient13–100.0530%24 May
dust213–110.0025%24 May
mirage9–130.0617%23 May
overpass10–130.0140%23 May
mirage10–130.0518%23 May
mirage13–70.0439%23 May
mirage7–13-0.083%23 May
dust213–80.0623%23 May
ancient13–11-0.0017%23 May
ancient13–16-0.0221%22 May
mirage13–70.1215%22 May
overpass23–250.0114%22 May
anubis13–11-0.0233%21 May
ancient19–160.0731%21 May
nuke9–13-0.0618%19 May
anubis13–40.1528%18 May
ancient14–160.0216%18 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →