FSGCCR

FSGCCR — CS2 Stats

VG76561198170031050[U:1:209765322]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

727Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,324Hours in CS24Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,078 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (27 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,078 → 1,078
+23Tracked matches · now 727
−10.0ppWin rate · 46.7% → 36.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,208 +1,863 23 May – 5 Jul · 16 days played
19,34522,394peak 22,39423 May5 Jul
Faceit ELO: 1,078 +0 30 Aug – 21 Sept · 6 observations
1,0781,078peak 1,07830 Aug21 Sept
22,498Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,078Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
46Days played since 2026-05-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,078
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 123 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches40——
Win rate35%——
K/D0.99——
Headshot %39%——

Measured 19 Sep 2026 → 18 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,934), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate34.6%43.7%44.8%10.2% short
Shot accuracy12.1%12.0%12.4%0.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.961.021.030.07 short
Match win rate44.9%44.7%45.2%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFSGCCRFACEITLevel 5 · 1,078 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPEAK ELO1,078csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning66
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY40–58–2Last 10040%Win rateWWLWWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +0.1pp headshot accuracy · −18ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 503ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 512ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility5.4
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch4.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning6.6
Utility5.4
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact0.6

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time519ms−38ms
first ⅓ avg 557ms → last ⅓ avg 519ms
Headshot accuracy20.6%−2.9%
first ⅓ avg 23.6% → last ⅓ avg 20.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–6 · ancient, 28 Jun →
58%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · overpass, 30 May →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · mirage, 13 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 20 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
8–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 50% over 16mirageWeakest map · 18% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisB199–1047%0.01
ancientC188–1044%0.01
dust2B168–850%0.00
mirageD112–918%0.01
nukeB115–645%-0.02
infernoB115–645%-0.01
cacheD82–625%-0.01
overpassD51–420%-0.03
vertigo—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 11). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

52,387Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
2,720Matches
44.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
34.6%Headshot %
12.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
7,154MVPs
1,232Hours (in match)
3,744Bombs planted
1,391Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

7,748dust2
4,030inferno
2,503nuke
475train
369cbble
353vertigo
86office
85lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

258Matches
52%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
77.7ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient5646%1.0915.9
Mirage4757%1.0214.3
Dust23653%1.1016.8
Anubis3256%1.0615.9
Inferno2763%1.2516.6
Nuke2264%0.9313.9
Cache743%1.2917.6
Vertigo633%0.8213.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy
35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.5%Spray accuracy
81.0%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
519msReaction time
30.8%T opening success
58.2%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
9.2%Flash assists
7.32HE damage / grenade
14.77Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.7778% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–10-0.0414%13 Oct →
dust213–60.0718%10 Oct →
cache7–130.0121%10 Oct →
anubis16–14-0.0215%10 Oct →
dust213–110.0420%8 Oct →
anubis14–160.0315%3 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0511%3 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0015%3 Oct →
inferno7–130.0127%29 Sept →
anubis7–130.0532%29 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0416%27 Sept →
nuke6–130.0335%27 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0025%7 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0429%7 Sept →
ancient13–60.1028%3 Sept →
ancient13–80.0015%2 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0013%1 Sept →
nuke22–19-0.049%30 Aug →
anubis3–13-0.046%30 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0911%26 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0219%26 Aug →
anubis16–120.0524%26 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0022%25 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0518%23 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0833%14 Aug →
inferno13–80.0926%14 Aug →
cache11–13-0.027%13 Aug →
dust210–130.0832%9 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0524%9 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0628%28 Jul →
anubis13–40.0824%27 Jul →
dust213–90.1229%26 Jul →
ancient10–13-0.0120%24 Jul →
inferno8–8-0.1222%20 Jul →
cache13–60.0529%19 Jul →
inferno13–30.0823%18 Jul →
anubis13–110.0033%18 Jul →
ancient10–130.0524%18 Jul →
cache6–130.0229%18 Jul →
anubis13–80.0621%17 Jul →
ancient9–130.0233%12 Jul →
nuke13–10-0.0214%12 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0016%5 Jul →
inferno13–40.0220%5 Jul →
mirage14–16-0.0129%5 Jul →
overpass2–13-0.0233%3 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0116%28 Jun →
ancient13–60.1323%28 Jun →
inferno3–130.0016%28 Jun →
anubis13–110.0019%27 Jun →
nuke4–130.0016%26 Jun →
nuke14–16-0.0134%26 Jun →
ancient16–140.0220%25 Jun →
anubis10–130.029%25 Jun →
inferno2–13-0.0319%23 Jun →
nuke13–10-0.024%23 Jun →
overpass13–11-0.0412%23 Jun →
anubis13–11-0.0226%20 Jun →
ancient13–60.0614%20 Jun →
inferno13–5-0.0017%20 Jun →
anubis13–20.1115%20 Jun →
mirage3–13-0.0626%20 Jun →
dust213–100.0113%20 Jun →
anubis13–10-0.0328%20 Jun →
mirage13–16-0.0419%17 Jun →
ancient10–13-0.0418%17 Jun →
anubis6–13-0.0717%16 Jun →
dust25–13-0.0423%16 Jun →
anubis4–130.0331%15 Jun →
cache6–13-0.0633%15 Jun →
ancient6–13-0.0329%14 Jun →
nuke13–5-0.0223%14 Jun →
dust23–13-0.0819%14 Jun →
ancient8–13-0.0010%7 Jun →
mirage8–130.0921%6 Jun →
dust216–13-0.0213%6 Jun →
inferno16–12-0.0215%6 Jun →
ancient13–90.0120%6 Jun →
anubis11–130.0228%2 Jun →
dust23–130.0439%2 Jun →
mirage13–90.0321%2 Jun →
dust213–8-0.0421%2 Jun →
nuke11–13-0.0022%2 Jun →
mirage12–120.0034%31 May →
nuke13–16-0.0522%31 May →
inferno8–13-0.0412%30 May →
dust216–130.0120%30 May →
overpass2–13-0.089%30 May →
cache13–7-0.0528%30 May →
vertigo4–13-0.0413%30 May →
overpass10–13-0.0158%30 May →
anubis8–130.0421%25 May →
ancient9–130.0118%25 May →
ancient4–13-0.0730%25 May →
dust211–130.0116%25 May →
ancient13–100.0530%24 May →
dust213–110.0025%24 May →
mirage9–130.0617%23 May →
overpass10–130.0140%23 May →
mirage10–130.0518%23 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.