beto

beto — CS2 Stats

BW76561198169541370[U:1:209275642]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

716Tracked matches67%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#26437 of 258702 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,839 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,640 +5,199 28 Feb – 16 May · 6 days played
17,73724,640peak 24,64028 Feb16 May
24,640Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,839Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
70Days played since 2024-02-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,839
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 162 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbetoFACEITLevel 10 · 1,839 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO1,839csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning46
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY59–37–4Last 10059%Win rateLLLWWWTWTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +3.7pp headshot accuracy · −59ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 619ms

Last 10

  • 5–3–2 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Last 20

  • 12–5–3 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 652ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility4.9
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 642ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning4.6
Utility4.9
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time653ms+220ms
first ⅓ avg 433ms → last ⅓ avg 653ms
Headshot accuracy22.4%+7.9%
first ⅓ avg 14.6% → last ⅓ avg 22.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–1 · nuke, 29 Aug →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · cache, 29 Apr →
422msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · anubis, 24 Jan →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 3 Mar →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L3Current streak
8–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 82% over 11infernoWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA3318–1555%-0.00
anubisS139–469%-0.01
ancientS119–282%0.03
infernoC104–640%-0.00
dust2C104–640%-0.02
nukeS107–370%0.01
overpassA53–260%-0.01
vertigoA53–260%-0.03
cache—11–0100%-0.03
warden—11–0100%-0.02
train—10–10%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

712Matches
54%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
78.7ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage16053%1.0014.6
Dust28754%1.1115.0
Anubis4551%1.0315.6
Ancient3053%1.1916.5
Inferno2045%1.1316.1
Nuke1369%1.2016.9
Vertigo1346%0.8211.5
Overpass1258%1.0214.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.1%Headshot accuracy
36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.2%Spray accuracy
82.3%Counter-strafing
11.4°Preaim
642msReaction time
23.9%T opening success
41.6%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
3.8%Flash assists
5.02HE damage / grenade
13.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.8637% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis2–13-0.0226%5 Jul →
overpass12–160.0125%20 Jun →
inferno11–13-0.0131%8 Jun →
anubis13–60.0418%30 Apr →
cache13–8-0.0345%29 Apr →
mirage13–100.0737%27 Apr →
overpass12–12-0.0116%18 Apr →
anubis13–30.035%8 Apr →
dust212–12-0.0123%2 Apr →
vertigo13–5-0.0227%2 Apr →
inferno13–30.0123%26 Mar →
inferno13–9-0.0133%26 Mar →
nuke13–50.0117%21 Mar →
mirage12–12-0.0131%21 Mar →
dust211–13-0.0613%21 Mar →
mirage5–1-0.0333%12 Mar →
mirage13–50.0716%11 Mar →
dust213–6-0.0023%11 Mar →
mirage13–11-0.0111%11 Mar →
mirage10–130.0116%11 Mar →
mirage16–130.0124%10 Mar →
ancient16–140.0714%9 Mar →
inferno6–13-0.0641%9 Mar →
dust26–13-0.0613%6 Mar →
mirage13–6-0.0010%5 Mar →
ancient7–130.0225%5 Mar →
mirage16–130.0113%5 Mar →
overpass13–80.0314%5 Mar →
mirage8–130.0129%3 Mar →
mirage13–50.0118%3 Mar →
overpass13–6-0.0214%3 Mar →
anubis13–1-0.0123%3 Mar →
anubis13–8-0.0131%28 Feb →
dust211–13-0.0424%28 Feb →
dust23–8-0.0130%15 Feb →
mirage11–130.0617%12 Feb →
inferno7–130.0314%12 Feb →
mirage8–13-0.0524%10 Feb →
ancient13–90.0520%3 Feb →
warden13–5-0.0223%31 Jan →
nuke13–6-0.0124%31 Jan →
mirage9–13-0.0523%26 Jan →
anubis13–7-0.0612%24 Jan →
anubis13–70.0128%24 Jan →
inferno13–7-0.0111%14 Nov →
train6–13-0.0623%9 Nov →
mirage7–130.0619%5 Nov →
dust213–30.0216%4 Nov →
ancient13–10.066%27 Sept →
dust213–30.0719%23 Sept →
mirage11–130.0819%7 Sept →
mirage13–60.1332%7 Sept →
inferno13–90.0224%30 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0220%15 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0021%4 Jun →
mirage13–10-0.0111%16 May →
mirage13–70.0029%28 Apr →
mirage13–7-0.0626%12 Apr →
dust29–13-0.0124%10 Apr →
mirage10–13-0.0326%10 Apr →
nuke14–160.0113%31 Jan →
anubis5–13-0.0525%24 Jan →
anubis4–13-0.0123%24 Jan →
anubis19–150.0525%23 Jan →
inferno7–130.0016%22 Jan →
anubis13–7-0.0138%22 Jan →
ancient13–100.0722%22 Jan →
mirage13–5-0.0412%4 Nov →
ancient13–4-0.0025%29 Oct →
nuke13–10.1322%29 Aug →
vertigo15–15-0.0034%26 Jun →
ancient16–130.0335%29 May →
anubis8–13-0.0229%7 May →
mirage17–19-0.0714%2 May →
mirage9–13-0.0121%1 May →
dust213–3-0.0540%26 Apr →
overpass16–14-0.0624%25 Apr →
mirage13–8-0.0715%25 Apr →
vertigo13–3-0.0031%22 Apr →
nuke13–11-0.0712%22 Apr →
ancient1–00.000%17 Apr →
nuke13–20.000%17 Apr →
nuke13–60.000%16 Apr →
nuke11–140.000%9 Apr →
mirage10–130.000%4 Apr →
mirage13–9-0.0322%9 Mar →
mirage19–17-0.0319%7 Mar →
ancient11–130.000%5 Mar →
mirage9–130.000%4 Mar →
mirage13–6-0.0714%1 Mar →
mirage13–5-0.0224%29 Feb →
vertigo18–22-0.0932%29 Feb →
mirage6–13-0.0738%28 Feb →
ancient13–60.000%25 Feb →
inferno4–130.000%24 Feb →
vertigo13–9-0.0617%24 Feb →
ancient16–140.000%22 Feb →
inferno15–190.000%22 Feb →
nuke6–130.000%20 Feb →
nuke13–50.000%20 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 10500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.