dartman

dartman — CS2 Stats

AU76561198169290918[U:1:209025190]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,120Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,109Top 50% of 204,097 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~12% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#94088 of 251207 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,328 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,109 +294 12 Sept – 9 Oct · 19 days played
17,44820,857peak 20,85712 Sept9 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,328 +0 12 Sept – 17 Sept · 2 observations
1,3281,328peak 1,32812 Sept17 Sept
21,102Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,328Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
20Days played since 2026-09-12

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,328
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 23 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-12
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-12

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,748 below peak (20,857)
  • +294 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 891 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-12
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-12

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdartmanFACEITLevel 5 · 1,328 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER19,109 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,328csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim94
Positioning51
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–48–2Last 10050%Win rateWWLLLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.7pp headshot accuracy · −10ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim9.4
Utility3.7
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 92% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 43 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 553ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.4
Positioning5.1
Utility3.7
Mechanics9.4
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time551ms−55ms
first ⅓ avg 606ms → last ⅓ avg 551ms
Headshot accuracy24.4%−3.6%
first ⅓ avg 28.0% → last ⅓ avg 24.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–5 · nuke, 29 Sept →
79%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · mirage, 25 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · inferno, 26 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 9 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
6–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 56% over 16anubisWeakest map · 45% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2613–1350%0.01
dust2B179–853%-0.00
nukeA169–756%0.04
ancientB126–650%0.02
anubisB115–645%-0.00
infernoA116–555%0.01
vertigo—41–325%-0.04
cache—31–233%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

514Matches
48%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
76.3ADR
62%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage22250%1.0414.9
Dust28547%1.1016.4
Ancient6644%1.1315.0
Nuke5064%1.1315.3
Anubis3656%1.1715.4
Inferno3135%1.1015.4
Cache1323%0.9915.5
Overpass520%0.6512.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.4%Headshot accuracy
39.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.9%Spray accuracy
92.4%Counter-strafing
6.6°Preaim
553msReaction time
47.5%T opening success
38.1%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
1.6%Flash assists
11.74HE damage / grenade
2.27Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4877 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 38.0694% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis19–16-0.0118%9 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0321%9 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0226%9 Oct →
mirage7–130.0129%9 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0316%9 Oct →
mirage13–20.0932%9 Oct →
ancient13–70.0022%8 Oct →
mirage13–30.0534%7 Oct →
vertigo13–10-0.0131%7 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0114%6 Oct →
inferno16–12-0.0223%6 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0525%5 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0116%5 Oct →
nuke13–60.0524%5 Oct →
anubis13–70.1324%5 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0629%3 Oct →
inferno10–130.0026%3 Oct →
anubis8–3-0.0223%3 Oct →
mirage11–130.0031%3 Oct →
vertigo8–13-0.0615%3 Oct →
ancient10–130.0313%3 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0321%2 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0613%2 Oct →
mirage13–80.0415%2 Oct →
inferno13–4-0.0436%2 Oct →
mirage14–16-0.0622%2 Oct →
anubis13–90.0430%1 Oct →
mirage11–130.0320%1 Oct →
dust213–100.0736%1 Oct →
inferno13–80.0234%1 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.1027%1 Oct →
dust216–130.0232%1 Oct →
dust213–110.0328%1 Oct →
mirage13–100.0118%30 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0431%30 Sept →
nuke8–130.0115%30 Sept →
ancient15–150.0625%30 Sept →
nuke13–50.1826%29 Sept →
ancient13–80.0625%29 Sept →
inferno13–70.0615%29 Sept →
dust213–70.0529%29 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0118%29 Sept →
dust213–70.0428%29 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0729%29 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0312%27 Sept →
ancient13–70.0933%27 Sept →
nuke13–70.1030%27 Sept →
inferno13–40.1626%27 Sept →
ancient13–20.0626%27 Sept →
nuke10–130.0519%27 Sept →
nuke13–40.1427%27 Sept →
mirage5–130.0132%27 Sept →
vertigo4–13-0.0528%27 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0227%26 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0015%26 Sept →
nuke15–15-0.0130%26 Sept →
anubis12–16-0.0218%26 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0425%26 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0279%25 Sept →
ancient4–9-0.0913%25 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0414%25 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0532%25 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0513%24 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0124%24 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0217%24 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0539%24 Sept →
vertigo6–13-0.0218%23 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0121%23 Sept →
mirage13–100.0426%23 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0025%23 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0232%22 Sept →
anubis13–110.0024%22 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0224%22 Sept →
inferno13–20.1027%22 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0025%22 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0915%22 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0225%20 Sept →
nuke13–40.0524%20 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0133%20 Sept →
mirage13–100.0337%20 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0332%20 Sept →
mirage13–100.0519%19 Sept →
dust213–20.0815%19 Sept →
nuke13–50.0835%19 Sept →
dust26–130.0038%19 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0341%19 Sept →
mirage13–60.0825%19 Sept →
ancient13–30.1441%19 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0534%19 Sept →
nuke13–90.0534%19 Sept →
cache13–110.0132%19 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0422%18 Sept →
anubis12–160.0031%18 Sept →
nuke13–100.0325%18 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0314%18 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0220%18 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0822%17 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0114%17 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0138%17 Sept →
mirage13–110.0652%17 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.