Kalajoen Günther

Kalajoen Günther — CS2 Stats

FI76561198168554376[U:1:208288648]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

481Tracked matches48%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingPositional Player
WingmanSilver Elite Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 35 days played since 18 Oct 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 8,550 -8,054 23 Oct29 Jun · 19 days played
6,33418,905peak 18,90523 Oct29 Jun
18,905Peak Premier in tracked matches
35Days played since 2025-10-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning41
Utility25

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD37576Last 10037%Win rateTWWLLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −3.3pp headshot accuracy · −28ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 702ms

Last 10

  • 361 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 714ms

Last 20

  • 7121 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 728ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility2.5
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 724ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning4.1
Utility2.5
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact4.4

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time734ms+7ms
first ⅓ avg 728ms → last ⅓ avg 734ms
Headshot accuracy20.4%+3.0%
first ⅓ avg 17.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 9–5 · vertigo, 14 Feb
43%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · cache, 10 Jul
555msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · nuke, 9 Jan
13–2Biggest win · overpass, 29 Oct

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 56% over 9anubisWeakest map · 9% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeD1751229%-0.03
infernoB168850%-0.03
mirageB136746%-0.03
ancientC125742%-0.03
anubisD111109%-0.05
dust2D93633%-0.04
overpassA95456%-0.03
cache41325%-0.03
vertigo32167%0.05
office31233%0.00
train3030%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (9% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1Matches
100%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
64.1ADR
17%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy
33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.4%Spray accuracy
87.1%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
724msReaction time
23.3%T opening success
38.2%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
0.6%Flash assists
8.13HE damage / grenade
2.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 724.1777ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3921 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.2569% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

9% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache15–15-0.0413%1 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0013%1 Aug
inferno13–40.0921%1 Aug
dust211–13-0.0624%1 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0319%31 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0024%31 Jul
vertigo9–13-0.0521%25 Jul
ancient13–16-0.0620%25 Jul
cache5–13-0.0917%25 Jul
vertigo10–10.1024%24 Jul
nuke11–130.0734%24 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0713%10 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0317%10 Jul
cache2–13-0.0443%10 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0413%9 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0416%9 Jul
anubis1–13-0.0827%9 Jul
dust213–11-0.0224%9 Jul
cache13–70.0621%9 Jul
office13–11-0.0222%9 Jul
nuke13–100.0322%29 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0623%29 Jun
dust213–7-0.0023%29 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0925%29 Jun
nuke13–4-0.0119%29 Jun
office9–130.0822%29 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0114%26 Jun
overpass13–10-0.0918%26 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0123%26 Jun
mirage16–14-0.056%21 Jun
overpass13–3-0.019%21 Jun
inferno13–70.0312%21 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0429%14 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0631%14 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0516%14 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0421%14 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0811%12 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0422%12 Jun
ancient8–130.0017%12 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0215%12 Jun
overpass5–13-0.0119%12 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0823%12 Jun
ancient13–7-0.1019%15 May
inferno11–13-0.0519%15 May
anubis3–13-0.0219%15 May
dust210–130.0117%15 May
mirage10–13-0.0114%15 Mar
overpass15–15-0.059%14 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0813%14 Mar
dust28–13-0.0512%14 Mar
nuke8–13-0.0914%14 Mar
ancient14–16-0.0014%14 Mar
overpass3–13-0.0925%13 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0617%13 Mar
dust27–13-0.100%13 Mar
overpass13–5-0.0222%2 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0431%2 Mar
dust28–13-0.0212%28 Feb
overpass9–13-0.0013%28 Feb
anubis15–15-0.0516%28 Feb
dust213–8-0.0818%28 Feb
inferno13–11-0.0520%27 Feb
nuke11–13-0.0715%27 Feb
anubis2–13-0.120%27 Feb
ancient8–13-0.0719%27 Feb
nuke13–4-0.0925%27 Feb
mirage13–80.0417%27 Feb
vertigo9–50.1018%14 Feb
inferno15–15-0.0620%13 Feb
office9–13-0.0613%7 Feb
anubis15–15-0.0317%31 Jan
inferno13–10-0.0018%9 Jan
train10–13-0.0210%9 Jan
nuke7–130.0217%9 Jan
inferno13–16-0.0629%6 Jan
nuke7–13-0.0219%6 Jan
nuke8–130.0011%29 Dec
overpass13–9-0.0214%29 Dec
mirage10–13-0.0219%27 Dec
mirage13–90.0318%27 Dec
dust24–13-0.0519%26 Dec
mirage7–130.0213%26 Dec
ancient13–9-0.0019%4 Nov
ancient13–11-0.0224%4 Nov
nuke13–7-0.0133%4 Nov
inferno13–70.0312%29 Oct
overpass13–2-0.0127%29 Oct
ancient13–110.0113%29 Oct
nuke10–13-0.039%28 Oct
train15–15-0.0222%26 Oct
inferno13–8-0.0318%26 Oct
inferno8–13-0.0920%23 Oct
nuke10–13-0.0910%22 Oct
ancient13–90.018%19 Oct
inferno16–14-0.0711%19 Oct
nuke3–13-0.0518%18 Oct
train10–13-0.0214%18 Oct
inferno5–13-0.0526%18 Oct
mirage5–13-0.1015%18 Oct
nuke12–16-0.0519%18 Oct

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →