HiihTavares

HiihTavares — CS2 Stats

76561198167636707[U:1:207370979]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

347Tracked matches54%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating17,270Purple band · top ~19.4% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (24 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 347 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,270 +51 19 May – 19 Sept · 24 days played
15,95217,778peak 17,77819 May19 Sept
17,957Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,138Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-05-19

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,138
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 63 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-19
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-19

Premier CS Rating

  • 508 below peak (17,778)
  • +53 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,730 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-19
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-19

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHiihTavaresPREMIER17,270 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,138csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning48
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–50–4Last 10046%Win rateWWLWLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −4.1pp headshot accuracy · −33ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 728ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 656ms

Last 20

  • 8–10–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 672ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim7.1
Utility4.6
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 677ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning4.8
Utility4.6
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact6.2

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time658ms+24ms
first ⅓ avg 634ms → last ⅓ avg 658ms
Headshot accuracy21.1%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 22.1% → last ⅓ avg 21.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–5 · dust2, 18 Jul →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 5–5 · dust2, 26 Jul →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · inferno, 6 Jul →
13–3Biggest win · dust2, 23 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
11–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 9mirageWeakest map · 24% over 29
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD297–2224%-0.01
dust2A2716–1159%0.00
infernoB158–753%-0.01
ancientD103–730%-0.01
anubisS96–367%-0.01
cacheB84–450%0.01
nuke—11–0100%0.01
overpass—11–0100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (24% over 29). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

77Matches
49%Win rate
1.28Avg K/D
82.1ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1450%1.2416.6
Mirage1450%1.7417.4
Ancient1331%1.0918.3
Dust21164%1.0714.9
Overpass850%1.5919.1
Nuke743%1.0818.0
Anubis560%0.8617.4
Train250%1.5419.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.5%Headshot accuracy
34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.9%Spray accuracy
86.4%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
677msReaction time
28.5%T opening success
44.2%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
2.5%Flash assists
6.86HE damage / grenade
7.88Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.518% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

24% win rate across 29 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–9-0.087%3 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0621%3 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0327%3 Aug →
dust213–60.0220%3 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0316%3 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.038%2 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0313%1 Aug →
anubis13–50.0324%31 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0113%31 Jul →
ancient13–10-0.0127%30 Jul →
cache15–150.0325%29 Jul →
anubis13–10-0.0424%29 Jul →
dust213–80.0127%29 Jul →
mirage6–130.0227%28 Jul →
dust24–13-0.0818%28 Jul →
dust26–130.0121%28 Jul →
mirage7–130.0231%28 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0315%28 Jul →
dust216–14-0.0314%28 Jul →
mirage15–15-0.0317%27 Jul →
inferno13–7-0.0214%26 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0326%26 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0618%26 Jul →
dust213–80.0923%26 Jul →
nuke13–100.0124%26 Jul →
dust213–50.0119%26 Jul →
anubis13–50.0335%26 Jul →
dust25–5-0.0242%26 Jul →
dust28–130.0125%26 Jul →
mirage16–140.0214%26 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0620%26 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0322%25 Jul →
inferno13–6-0.0420%24 Jul →
dust215–15-0.0125%24 Jul →
mirage13–4-0.037%24 Jul →
mirage13–60.0319%24 Jul →
mirage14–160.0318%24 Jul →
dust213–40.0331%23 Jul →
mirage11–130.0722%23 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0213%23 Jul →
dust213–30.0821%23 Jul →
mirage8–130.0230%22 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.055%22 Jul →
dust20–13-0.090%22 Jul →
dust213–4-0.0126%22 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.0029%22 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0613%21 Jul →
dust21–13-0.0225%21 Jul →
ancient11–130.0823%21 Jul →
inferno16–130.0723%19 Jul →
dust213–110.0524%18 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0524%18 Jul →
dust213–50.1325%18 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0719%18 Jul →
mirage11–130.0328%18 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.0712%16 Jul →
dust213–3-0.0628%16 Jul →
cache3–13-0.0525%16 Jul →
anubis13–7-0.0020%15 Jul →
mirage14–16-0.0127%15 Jul →
dust28–130.0625%15 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0020%15 Jul →
cache10–130.0224%9 Jul →
ancient5–130.0134%9 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0727%9 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0323%9 Jul →
inferno13–100.0735%9 Jul →
cache13–50.0921%8 Jul →
inferno4–13-0.0119%8 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0116%7 Jul →
dust213–70.0625%7 Jul →
cache13–110.0233%6 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0230%6 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0224%6 Jul →
ancient8–130.0139%6 Jul →
inferno0–6-0.0327%5 Jul →
overpass13–110.0425%5 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0523%2 Jul →
anubis13–5-0.0123%2 Jul →
dust213–8-0.0510%1 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0718%1 Jul →
dust213–70.0215%28 Jun →
anubis13–70.0225%28 Jun →
ancient13–10-0.0719%28 Jun →
dust210–130.0524%28 Jun →
mirage13–30.1231%15 Jun →
mirage13–80.0214%15 Jun →
ancient15–15-0.0526%11 Jun →
cache13–110.0123%10 Jun →
inferno13–110.0527%9 Jun →
inferno16–140.0417%27 May →
mirage5–13-0.0316%27 May →
inferno6–130.0431%27 May →
mirage10–13-0.0123%26 May →
ancient10–130.0117%26 May →
mirage13–100.0024%26 May →
ancient13–90.0218%21 May →
inferno10–13-0.0216%21 May →
dust211–130.0217%19 May →
mirage3–13-0.0511%19 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.