Glacialis

Glacialis — CS2 Stats

76561198162732095[U:1:202466367]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

244Tracked matches41%Win rate2023Tracked since
392Hours in CS29Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating14,999Blue band · top ~28.4% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+37Premier CS Rating · 14,962 → 14,999
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 30 days played since 12 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,999 +1,465 12 Aug23 Sept · 32 days played
13,53416,180peak 16,18012 Aug23 Sept
16,414Peak Premier in tracked matches
30Days played since 2026-08-12

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,181 below peak (16,180)
  • +605 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 1 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches13130
Win rate54%31%+23pp
K/D0.860.70+0.16
Headshot %41%49%−8pp

Measured 17 Sep 202623 Sep 2026; previous 10 Sep 2026 → 17 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=21,222), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate43.6%41.9%44.3%meets
Shot accuracy8.0%9.6%11.8%3.8% short
Kill/death ratio0.790.981.030.24 short
Match win rate48.4%43.8%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Purple band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGlacialisPREMIER14,999 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning53
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49492Last 10049%Win rateWWLLWWWTLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +0.4pp headshot accuracy · −30ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 525ms

Last 10

  • 631 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility4.6
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels2.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 560ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning5.3
Utility4.6
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact2.1

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time559ms−44ms
first ⅓ avg 602ms → last ⅓ avg 559ms
Headshot accuracy15.7%−3.2%
first ⅓ avg 18.9% → last ⅓ avg 15.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–6 · nuke, 6 Sept
100%Best headshot accuracy · 2–0 · mirage, 5 Sept
313msFastest reaction time · 0–4 · cache, 30 Aug
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 23 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
78In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 60% over 10anubisWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB21101148%-0.02
nukeB1991047%-0.01
infernoA1911858%-0.02
cacheB168850%-0.02
dust2A106460%-0.02
anubisD93633%-0.04
ancientD62433%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

7,873Lifetime kills
0.79K/D
531Matches
48.4%Match win rate · Top 25% of Blue band
43.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Blue band
8.0%Shot accuracy
901MVPs
212Hours (in match)
721Bombs planted
98Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,144inferno
720nuke
694dust2
418vertigo
226train
8lake
5bank
2safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.4%Headshot accuracy
34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.9%Spray accuracy
78.5%Counter-strafing
11.8°Preaim
560msReaction time
36.3%T opening success
45.1%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
7.46HE damage / grenade
5.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.2559% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–10-0.0317%23 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0118%22 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0513%22 Sept
nuke2–13-0.0712%22 Sept
inferno13–3-0.0114%21 Sept
dust213–11-0.0114%21 Sept
mirage13–20.0221%21 Sept
cache15–15-0.0118%21 Sept
inferno12–16-0.0314%19 Sept
nuke13–100.009%19 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0013%19 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0418%19 Sept
nuke13–16-0.004%18 Sept
inferno13–60.0114%18 Sept
cache11–13-0.0613%16 Sept
cache13–5-0.0216%16 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0511%15 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0522%15 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0114%15 Sept
dust213–30.0423%14 Sept
cache11–13-0.0120%14 Sept
dust210–130.0023%14 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0211%14 Sept
nuke13–11-0.078%13 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0621%10 Sept
inferno3–13-0.0321%10 Sept
anubis11–13-0.0210%10 Sept
mirage10–130.018%9 Sept
ancient13–16-0.0127%9 Sept
dust210–13-0.0720%7 Sept
cache13–70.0017%7 Sept
dust213–40.0425%7 Sept
inferno13–70.0111%6 Sept
mirage8–13-0.019%6 Sept
mirage13–9-0.064%6 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0613%6 Sept
dust213–7-0.0414%6 Sept
nuke13–60.1023%6 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0915%5 Sept
cache13–100.0021%5 Sept
inferno13–50.0129%5 Sept
mirage2–00.03100%5 Sept
anubis11–13-0.0815%5 Sept
nuke13–100.0119%4 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0414%4 Sept
cache3–13-0.0114%4 Sept
nuke13–7-0.0213%4 Sept
inferno16–13-0.0213%4 Sept
anubis4–13-0.068%4 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0214%4 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0122%1 Sept
cache13–50.0615%1 Sept
cache13–16-0.079%1 Sept
inferno13–4-0.0610%1 Sept
inferno11–130.0022%31 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0319%31 Aug
cache4–13-0.0811%31 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0514%30 Aug
anubis13–100.0121%30 Aug
cache0–4-0.0733%30 Aug
ancient13–40.0326%30 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0928%30 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0423%29 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0735%29 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0711%29 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0520%28 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0216%28 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0619%28 Aug
cache15–15-0.0428%26 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0210%26 Aug
cache13–60.0519%26 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0317%26 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0317%25 Aug
inferno11–130.0212%24 Aug
anubis16–13-0.0515%24 Aug
mirage11–3-0.0013%24 Aug
nuke10–130.0412%24 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0212%23 Aug
ancient9–13-0.079%23 Aug
mirage9–130.0021%23 Aug
inferno13–10.0822%23 Aug
nuke13–50.0114%22 Aug
dust213–4-0.0126%22 Aug
nuke13–10.0913%22 Aug
dust22–13-0.0820%22 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0520%22 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0515%22 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0112%22 Aug
cache13–70.0521%20 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0520%20 Aug
dust213–7-0.0316%19 Aug
nuke11–130.0517%18 Aug
cache13–9-0.0514%18 Aug
mirage0–13-0.0780%18 Aug
cache13–10-0.0217%13 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0620%13 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0616%13 Aug
dust29–13-0.0518%12 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0710%12 Aug
mirage13–30.0528%12 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →