QQuaLLe

QQuaLLe — CS2 Stats

KP76561198162594046[U:1:202328318]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

620Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating22,870Top 25% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#39560 of 221309 tracked
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 620 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 27 days played since 19 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,870 +299 2 Aug9 Sept · 6 days played
22,57122,870peak 22,8702 Aug9 Sept
23,107Peak Premier in tracked matches
27Days played since 2026-07-19

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 22,870
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 2,130 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-06
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGQQuaLLeFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER22,870 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning51
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58411Last 10058%Win rateLLLWWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −2.0pp headshot accuracy · −32ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 506ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 490ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 506ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility6.6
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 17% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning5.1
Utility6.6
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time508ms−73ms
first ⅓ avg 581ms → last ⅓ avg 508ms
Headshot accuracy20.2%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 19.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–4 · nuke, 19 Jul
62%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · mirage, 29 Jul
375msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · anubis, 13 Aug
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 12 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L3Current streak
118In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 15anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS2620677%0.01
dust2C2191243%-0.01
infernoB189950%0.00
cacheS1512380%0.01
mirageB84450%0.01
nukeC73443%-0.00
anubisD51420%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

586Matches
59%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
87.9ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient6568%1.2217.5
Dust26055%1.2218.0
Inferno4060%1.0716.1
Nuke2176%1.1216.6
Anubis1953%1.1217.8
Mirage1850%0.9615.3
Cache1872%1.1415.0
Vertigo10%1.2421.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.3%Headshot accuracy
35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.0%Spray accuracy
75.4%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
503msReaction time
17.1%T opening success
54.9%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
12.53HE damage / grenade
11.74Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 17.1059% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis10–13-0.0413%22 Aug
ancient8–130.0115%22 Aug
dust28–13-0.0618%21 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0313%20 Aug
cache13–50.0813%19 Aug
inferno1–13-0.0415%19 Aug
nuke16–12-0.0221%19 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0225%19 Aug
dust213–80.0318%18 Aug
ancient13–90.0113%18 Aug
inferno13–110.0522%17 Aug
cache13–30.018%17 Aug
mirage13–110.0313%17 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0737%17 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0117%17 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0119%17 Aug
cache14–16-0.0513%17 Aug
cache13–30.0412%15 Aug
ancient13–110.0826%15 Aug
cache25–230.0418%14 Aug
inferno11–130.0133%14 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0422%14 Aug
nuke13–70.0121%13 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0321%13 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0024%13 Aug
anubis0–30.0750%13 Aug
mirage13–110.0617%13 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0013%12 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0129%12 Aug
inferno13–4-0.0317%12 Aug
ancient13–00.0421%12 Aug
dust26–13-0.0325%12 Aug
inferno11–130.0124%12 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0311%6 Aug
mirage16–140.0214%6 Aug
cache13–90.0214%6 Aug
dust29–130.0020%5 Aug
dust212–16-0.0624%5 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0020%3 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0123%3 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0710%3 Aug
dust215–15-0.0636%3 Aug
ancient13–80.0215%2 Aug
anubis13–90.0328%2 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0424%2 Aug
cache13–8-0.0124%2 Aug
ancient13–60.0426%2 Aug
ancient5–1-0.0220%2 Aug
inferno13–2-0.0214%2 Aug
dust213–20.0521%2 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0126%2 Aug
cache13–70.0420%1 Aug
dust23–13-0.0415%1 Aug
mirage13–100.0525%1 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0226%31 Jul
dust211–13-0.0115%31 Jul
cache11–13-0.0220%31 Jul
cache13–90.0117%31 Jul
inferno13–70.0111%31 Jul
inferno16–130.0217%30 Jul
ancient13–70.1217%30 Jul
ancient13–110.0020%30 Jul
nuke9–130.0417%30 Jul
dust213–4-0.0133%29 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0862%29 Jul
dust213–50.0124%28 Jul
dust24–13-0.0523%27 Jul
dust213–70.0325%27 Jul
cache13–110.0320%26 Jul
dust216–130.0219%24 Jul
ancient13–80.0423%24 Jul
cache13–40.0217%24 Jul
dust211–130.0124%24 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0226%23 Jul
dust27–13-0.089%23 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0021%23 Jul
inferno13–16-0.0221%23 Jul
inferno8–130.0222%22 Jul
dust211–130.0212%22 Jul
cache13–11-0.0414%22 Jul
mirage9–130.0319%22 Jul
ancient13–50.0420%22 Jul
ancient13–100.0912%21 Jul
cache13–20.0114%21 Jul
ancient16–13-0.0126%21 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0524%21 Jul
ancient13–60.039%21 Jul
inferno11–130.019%21 Jul
inferno19–160.0215%21 Jul
ancient13–40.0221%20 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0623%20 Jul
cache4–13-0.0524%20 Jul
dust213–110.0213%20 Jul
dust213–9-0.0121%20 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0417%20 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0221%20 Jul
dust213–50.0720%19 Jul
inferno13–20.1028%19 Jul
dust24–13-0.0425%19 Jul
nuke13–40.1325%19 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 10500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →