Ciocardău

Ciocardău — CS2 Stats

76561198161245944[U:1:200980216]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,880Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidSupport
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (19 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 3,007 → 3,007
+14Tracked matches · now 1,880
−10.0ppWin rate · 50.0% → 40.0%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 3,007 +0 30 Aug – 19 Sept · 7 observations
3,0073,007peak 3,00730 Aug19 Sept
3,007Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-03-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,007
  • Next: 3,500 ELO at 3,500 — 493 to go
  • Reached: 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-30
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-30

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCiocardăuPEAK ELO3,007csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning54
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42–58Last 10042%Win rateLWLWLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.8pp headshot accuracy · −23ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 428ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 455ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 467ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility5.5
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 18% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning5.4
Utility5.5
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact1.7

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time471ms−87ms
first ⅓ avg 558ms → last ⅓ avg 471ms
Headshot accuracy23.8%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 24.7% → last ⅓ avg 23.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 3–4 · dust2, 4 Jun →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · inferno, 25 May →
328msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · dust2, 21 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · cache, 7 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
9–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 56% over 16infernoWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2310–1343%-0.01
mirageC166–1038%-0.01
ancientA169–756%0.01
anubisB168–850%-0.00
infernoD134–931%-0.02
cacheA95–456%-0.01
nuke—40–40%-0.03
overpass—30–30%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,719Matches
62%Win rate
1.49Avg K/D
87.8ADR
58%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage28662%1.4119.1
Ancient22362%1.3718.6
Anubis14066%1.3818.8
Dust212857%1.2516.4
Nuke3456%1.1216.5
Inferno2854%1.3217.9
Train1968%1.2715.7
Overpass1833%1.2017.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.6%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.9%Spray accuracy
78.7%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
474msReaction time
18.3%T opening success
45.9%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
7.5%Flash assists
10.12HE damage / grenade
8.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 18.2632% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage6–13-0.0512%7 Oct →
cache13–20.0120%7 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0319%7 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0119%7 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0221%7 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0538%7 Oct →
inferno9–130.0520%30 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0036%30 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0317%29 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0223%29 Sept →
anubis13–30.0118%29 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0326%26 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0613%26 Sept →
ancient13–80.0218%26 Sept →
anubis13–50.0135%5 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0529%29 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0616%29 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0124%28 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0830%28 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0624%26 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0733%26 Aug →
anubis13–80.0328%26 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0111%26 Aug →
anubis7–130.0328%26 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0121%26 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0131%24 Aug →
ancient13–60.0818%24 Aug →
anubis7–130.0232%24 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0329%24 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0521%23 Aug →
mirage13–110.0217%23 Aug →
ancient5–130.0033%23 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0722%21 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0628%21 Aug →
cache13–60.0132%21 Aug →
anubis16–140.0528%19 Aug →
inferno13–60.0233%19 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0520%19 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0130%19 Aug →
cache5–130.000%14 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0331%13 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0523%13 Aug →
ancient13–50.0424%20 Jul →
anubis13–100.0334%20 Jul →
dust213–110.0327%16 Jun →
anubis6–13-0.0421%16 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0338%16 Jun →
dust213–30.0432%12 Jun →
ancient16–14-0.0024%12 Jun →
mirage3–13-0.0216%12 Jun →
inferno11–130.0129%8 Jun →
dust23–13-0.0027%8 Jun →
dust27–13-0.0129%8 Jun →
mirage14–160.0336%8 Jun →
dust23–40.1020%4 Jun →
mirage7–130.0220%4 Jun →
mirage13–110.0322%4 Jun →
overpass8–13-0.0416%4 Jun →
dust216–14-0.0429%4 Jun →
dust213–7-0.0326%3 Jun →
inferno5–8-0.0343%3 Jun →
dust28–13-0.0123%29 May →
anubis5–13-0.0535%29 May →
dust213–80.0329%26 May →
anubis13–100.0123%26 May →
ancient13–30.0824%25 May →
mirage13–80.0433%25 May →
inferno11–13-0.0144%25 May →
dust28–13-0.0122%5 May →
anubis16–13-0.0121%5 May →
nuke3–13-0.0627%5 May →
dust213–10-0.0218%3 May →
nuke8–13-0.0121%3 May →
ancient16–130.0229%3 May →
anubis3–13-0.0827%3 May →
dust29–13-0.0316%3 May →
anubis12–160.0224%1 May →
dust29–13-0.0418%1 May →
mirage13–90.0229%1 May →
mirage3–13-0.0618%30 Apr →
nuke8–130.0333%30 Apr →
anubis14–16-0.0323%29 Apr →
mirage5–13-0.0320%29 Apr →
overpass9–13-0.0429%28 Apr →
mirage4–13-0.0424%28 Apr →
nuke0–13-0.0916%25 Apr →
dust28–13-0.0335%25 Apr →
anubis13–80.0233%9 Apr →
overpass8–13-0.0321%9 Apr →
ancient13–90.0635%9 Apr →
mirage13–40.0410%6 Apr →
dust213–10-0.0128%6 Apr →
dust216–120.0625%29 Mar →
ancient13–100.0536%29 Mar →
mirage11–130.0428%29 Mar →
mirage9–13-0.0121%29 Mar →
ancient13–100.0229%29 Mar →
dust25–13-0.0417%29 Mar →
ancient6–13-0.0423%29 Mar →
dust25–13-0.0716%27 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

3K ELO Club1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.