Q-Q

Q-Q — CS2 Stats

PRO00Free AgentDenmarkRiflerSettings & gear profile →

76561198003437534[U:1:43171806]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,170Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating27,955Top 5% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2396 of 223621 tracked
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,170 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 45 days played since 7 Dec 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,955 +627 22 Feb17 Sept · 10 days played
27,32827,955peak 27,95522 Feb17 Sept
Faceit ELO: 3,636 +0 28 Aug17 Sept · 6 observations
3,6363,636peak 3,63628 Aug17 Sept
27,955Peak Premier in tracked matches
3,636Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
45Days played since 2025-12-07

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,636
  • Next: 4,000 ELO at 4,000 364 to go
  • Reached: 3,500 ELO · 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10
  • 3,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 27,955
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 2,045 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGQ-QPREMIER27,955 · Red bandPEAK ELO3,636csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim94
Positioning51
Utility74

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD61381Last 10061%Win rateWLLLLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −4.2pp headshot accuracy · +62ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 521ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 490ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim9.4
Utility7.4
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch4.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 43 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.4
Positioning5.1
Utility7.4
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact5.0

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.05
first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time489ms−69ms
first ⅓ avg 558ms → last ⅓ avg 489ms
Headshot accuracy25.1%−3.0%
first ⅓ avg 28.1% → last ⅓ avg 25.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–2 · anubis, 22 Jan
52%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · nuke, 16 Dec
313msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · inferno, 24 Aug
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 14 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
85In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 69% over 13mirageWeakest map · 50% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS1812667%0.03
dust2A1810856%0.02
mirageB147750%0.04
infernoS139469%0.02
nukeA116555%0.04
anubisS96367%0.04
cacheA53260%0.01
overpassA53260%0.04
train43175%0.11
warden110100%0.15
alpine1010%-0.03
vertigo110100%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,179Matches
63%Win rate
1.34Avg K/D
82.5ADR
58%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
25Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient18460%1.3216.1
Mirage16873%1.6017.5
Anubis10269%1.3916.9
Dust26961%1.4115.7
Nuke6073%1.3915.9
Vertigo4783%1.4917.1
Inferno4567%1.3914.9
Overpass3675%1.6517.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Inventory

$4,270Inventory value61ItemsFull inventory breakdown →
★ M9 Bayonet | Fade (Factory New)$1,558Desert Eagle | Blaze (Factory New)$1,025StatTrak™ AK-47 | Redline (Minimal Wear)$484Galil AR | Chatterbox (Battle-Scarred)$165StatTrak™ AK-47 | Neon Rider (Field-Tested)$124USP-S | Kill Confirmed (Field-Tested)$97

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.9%Headshot accuracy
38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.6%Spray accuracy
85.9%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
481msReaction time
35.4%T opening success
30.6%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
9.9%Flash assists
13.18HE damage / grenade
14.73Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.3724% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–5-0.0024%5 Sept
ancient6–130.0018%29 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0417%29 Aug
cache7–130.0123%28 Aug
mirage10–130.0737%28 Aug
inferno7–13-0.089%26 Aug
dust23–13-0.0331%26 Aug
anubis13–80.0733%26 Aug
inferno13–110.0523%26 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0521%26 Aug
cache13–9-0.0130%26 Aug
cache13–90.0326%24 Aug
ancient13–60.0320%24 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0232%24 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0025%24 Aug
dust27–13-0.0037%23 Aug
mirage13–110.0629%23 Aug
ancient5–130.0419%23 Aug
ancient11–130.0632%21 Aug
dust24–13-0.0729%21 Aug
cache13–60.0422%21 Aug
anubis16–140.0121%19 Aug
inferno13–60.0719%19 Aug
anubis9–130.0313%19 Aug
dust213–110.0228%19 Aug
mirage13–20.0630%14 Aug
inferno13–60.0218%14 Aug
cache5–13-0.0224%14 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0222%13 Aug
dust213–60.0635%13 Aug
ancient13–50.0432%29 Jun
nuke14–160.0523%13 Jun
dust211–130.0126%13 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0223%12 Jun
nuke13–60.0324%12 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0048%12 Jun
dust211–13-0.0216%2 May
dust213–40.0522%22 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0130%22 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0319%30 Mar
ancient9–13-0.0217%30 Mar
nuke10–130.0024%30 Mar
dust25–13-0.0519%30 Mar
ancient13–8-0.0110%29 Mar
mirage9–130.0124%29 Mar
ancient13–60.0222%29 Mar
ancient13–70.009%27 Mar
inferno13–20.1525%27 Mar
ancient13–40.0820%25 Mar
overpass13–11-0.0215%25 Mar
mirage12–120.0230%18 Mar
overpass5–130.0223%14 Mar
ancient4–13-0.0925%14 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0024%14 Mar
overpass9–130.0914%14 Mar
nuke13–110.0419%14 Mar
mirage13–80.0832%3 Mar
inferno13–80.0331%27 Feb
nuke13–70.0924%23 Feb
ancient13–40.1035%23 Feb
ancient13–80.1321%22 Feb
dust213–100.0946%22 Feb
inferno16–130.0722%22 Feb
inferno16–12-0.0131%22 Feb
inferno7–13-0.0225%8 Feb
mirage3–13-0.0014%8 Feb
mirage13–6-0.0124%7 Feb
ancient13–40.0926%7 Feb
overpass13–90.0418%7 Feb
nuke13–70.0428%7 Feb
ancient4–13-0.0419%4 Feb
mirage13–60.1133%4 Feb
dust24–13-0.0525%4 Feb
dust213–60.0219%24 Jan
dust213–60.0135%23 Jan
mirage13–90.0220%23 Jan
nuke13–20.0636%23 Jan
mirage13–110.0217%23 Jan
dust213–20.0638%23 Jan
anubis13–50.1219%22 Jan
anubis13–20.1619%22 Jan
warden13–50.1534%21 Jan
alpine1–4-0.0311%21 Jan
dust222–190.0619%21 Jan
dust210–10.0840%20 Jan
overpass13–50.0624%18 Jan
vertigo13–80.1020%18 Jan
nuke11–13-0.0228%14 Jan
ancient13–30.1231%10 Jan
train13–70.0844%9 Jan
train13–30.1343%3 Jan
dust26–130.0131%27 Dec
mirage8–130.0623%23 Dec
train10–130.0737%23 Dec
ancient13–60.0425%17 Dec
dust213–30.0329%17 Dec
nuke13–80.1252%16 Dec
mirage7–130.0623%11 Dec
anubis13–90.0237%10 Dec
train13–30.1422%7 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

3K ELO Club1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →