𝒟𝓇𝑒𝒶𝓂 Maker — CS2 Stats

FI76561198158665080[U:1:198399352]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,478Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingAll-Rounder

CSDB Leaderboard#55645 of 220015 tracked

FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 20 days played since 8 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,465 -1,728 8 Apr – 22 Apr · 13 days played

24,678Peak Premier in tracked matches

20Days played since 2026-04-08

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62

Positioning54

Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–52–2Last 10046%Win rateLWWWLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +6.4pp headshot accuracy · −10ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 23%
Avg reaction 514ms

Last 10

6–4 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 24%
Avg reaction 559ms

Last 20

10–10 · 50% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 21%
Avg reaction 565ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim6.2

Utility4.9

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels4.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like iM 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 566ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2

Positioning5.4

Utility4.9

Mechanics4.3

Opening Duels3.4

Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time564ms+5ms

first ⅓ avg 559ms → last ⅓ avg 564ms

Headshot accuracy18.2%+1.8%

first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 18.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 5–0 · anubis, 22 Apr →

33%Best headshot accuracy · 9–1 · nuke, 12 Apr →

406msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · ancient, 20 Aug →

13–3Biggest win · mirage, 20 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak

7–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 71% over 7infernoWeakest map · 20% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	B	26	14–12	54%	0.01
mirage	C	21	9–12	43%	0.00
ancient	C	17	7–10	41%	0.01
anubis	C	14	5–9	36%	0.02
overpass	S	7	5–2	71%	0.03
inferno	D	5	1–4	20%	0.01
dust2	A	5	3–2	60%	0.03
cache	—	4	2–2	50%	0.03
boulder	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy

34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.8%Spray accuracy

69.3%Counter-strafing

10.4°Preaim

566msReaction time

36.7%T opening success

50.6%CT opening success

0.55Enemies flashed / flash

7.4%Flash assists

12.54HE damage / grenade

3.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 3.8278 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 36.6853% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	10–13	-0.01	30%	20 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.01	25%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.02	26%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.00	9%	9 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.06	23%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.10	29%	8 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.06	29%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–6	-0.00	19%	20 Jul →
boulder	2–13	-0.08	21%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.07	28%	20 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.01	17%	20 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.10	11%	12 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.02	23%	29 Apr →
cache	13–7	0.01	19%	29 Apr →
nuke	6–13	-0.05	20%	22 Apr →
anubis	5–0	0.15	31%	22 Apr →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	9%	21 Apr →
anubis	9–13	0.01	15%	21 Apr →
inferno	13–10	0.03	6%	21 Apr →
ancient	13–6	0.02	25%	21 Apr →
mirage	5–13	-0.00	5%	20 Apr →
inferno	14–16	0.02	12%	20 Apr →
anubis	13–16	-0.01	10%	20 Apr →
nuke	13–5	0.07	20%	20 Apr →
mirage	13–5	0.04	25%	20 Apr →
anubis	13–7	0.06	24%	20 Apr →
ancient	8–13	0.06	14%	20 Apr →
mirage	5–13	-0.07	20%	20 Apr →
ancient	7–13	-0.06	11%	20 Apr →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	13%	20 Apr →
overpass	13–10	0.01	14%	20 Apr →
inferno	9–13	-0.03	13%	19 Apr →
anubis	4–13	0.05	4%	19 Apr →
ancient	13–5	0.14	16%	19 Apr →
inferno	7–13	0.03	9%	19 Apr →
nuke	13–5	0.10	16%	19 Apr →
anubis	13–4	0.05	12%	19 Apr →
mirage	13–11	0.03	16%	19 Apr →
ancient	13–8	0.04	12%	18 Apr →
dust2	13–7	0.07	23%	18 Apr →
mirage	13–7	-0.03	19%	18 Apr →
nuke	13–6	0.02	11%	18 Apr →
anubis	9–13	0.02	22%	18 Apr →
nuke	13–16	0.04	13%	18 Apr →
nuke	16–13	0.02	16%	17 Apr →
ancient	10–13	0.06	16%	17 Apr →
overpass	16–12	0.05	9%	17 Apr →
mirage	13–6	0.00	17%	16 Apr →
mirage	13–5	0.06	5%	16 Apr →
ancient	11–13	-0.00	11%	16 Apr →
anubis	7–13	-0.06	17%	16 Apr →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	9%	16 Apr →
nuke	5–13	-0.05	12%	16 Apr →
mirage	15–15	-0.02	19%	16 Apr →
anubis	9–13	-0.03	11%	16 Apr →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	11%	16 Apr →
nuke	13–9	0.03	13%	16 Apr →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	25%	16 Apr →
anubis	3–13	-0.06	25%	16 Apr →
nuke	13–11	-0.02	12%	16 Apr →
ancient	16–13	-0.01	10%	15 Apr →
mirage	13–6	0.05	5%	15 Apr →
ancient	13–5	0.06	6%	15 Apr →
nuke	8–13	-0.00	8%	15 Apr →
nuke	8–13	-0.05	13%	15 Apr →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	5%	15 Apr →
mirage	8–13	0.02	20%	15 Apr →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	14%	15 Apr →
overpass	9–13	-0.02	19%	15 Apr →
mirage	10–13	-0.00	15%	15 Apr →
ancient	13–9	-0.00	10%	15 Apr →
nuke	11–13	0.04	20%	15 Apr →
overpass	13–6	0.06	10%	15 Apr →
mirage	2–13	-0.01	14%	15 Apr →
anubis	16–14	0.01	16%	15 Apr →
nuke	6–13	0.01	11%	14 Apr →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	12%	14 Apr →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	21%	14 Apr →
anubis	3–13	0.02	14%	12 Apr →
overpass	9–13	0.03	20%	12 Apr →
nuke	9–1	0.01	33%	12 Apr →
nuke	13–16	-0.03	8%	12 Apr →
nuke	10–13	-0.05	26%	11 Apr →
mirage	4–13	-0.05	21%	11 Apr →
overpass	13–6	0.02	18%	11 Apr →
nuke	13–11	0.05	5%	11 Apr →
nuke	13–7	0.03	17%	11 Apr →
ancient	16–13	0.01	15%	11 Apr →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	10%	10 Apr →
overpass	13–4	0.05	26%	10 Apr →
ancient	10–13	-0.04	7%	8 Apr →
mirage	13–9	0.00	13%	8 Apr →
nuke	14–16	0.00	9%	8 Apr →
dust2	11–13	0.07	24%	8 Apr →
nuke	8–13	-0.04	28%	8 Apr →
nuke	11–13	0.01	16%	8 Apr →
dust2	13–11	0.02	20%	8 Apr →
anubis	16–14	0.11	10%	8 Apr →
nuke	13–4	0.04	24%	8 Apr →
mirage	15–15	0.01	12%	8 Apr →