Zip Zap

Zip Zap — CS2 Stats

NO76561198157277702[U:1:197011974]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,298Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating15,772Purple band · top ~25.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6 · 996 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−1363Premier CS Rating · 17,135 → 15,772

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,772 -1,761 10 Sept – 26 Oct · 14 days played
15,77217,989peak 17,98910 Sept26 Oct
18,227Peak Premier in tracked matches
996Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
15Days played since 2026-09-10

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 996
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 55 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-10
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-10

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,217 below peak (17,989)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,228 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZip ZapFACEITLevel 6 · 996 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER15,772 · Purple bandPEAK ELO996csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning66
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–45–4Last 10051%Win rateWLWWLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +2.5pp headshot accuracy · +37ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 537ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 501ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility5.6
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning6.6
Utility5.6
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels5.3
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time502ms−7ms
first ⅓ avg 510ms → last ⅓ avg 502ms
Headshot accuracy12.4%−0.0%
first ⅓ avg 12.4% → last ⅓ avg 12.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–7 · cache, 19 Oct →
35%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · dust2, 26 Oct →
344msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · anubis, 13 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 21 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 12ancientWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3619–1753%-0.01
dust2B158–753%-0.00
nukeS128–467%-0.01
cacheB105–550%0.02
anubisC104–640%-0.02
infernoA95–456%0.01
ancientD82–625%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

220Matches
52%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
76.9ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8850%0.8613.2
Dust23664%1.0514.7
Nuke3549%0.9917.2
Anubis1947%1.0415.7
Inferno1942%0.9214.9
Ancient1656%1.0113.9
Overpass580%1.1615.4
Cache20%0.7716.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.8%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.2%Spray accuracy
77.4%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
500msReaction time
57.9%T opening success
44.4%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
2.9%Flash assists
8.57HE damage / grenade
7.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.7627% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–6-0.0035%26 Oct →
ancient11–130.019%26 Oct →
nuke13–90.029%26 Oct →
dust213–50.1017%26 Oct →
dust212–160.0020%26 Oct →
mirage11–130.0620%26 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.059%25 Oct →
cache10–13-0.089%25 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0113%25 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.103%25 Oct →
mirage13–80.016%25 Oct →
inferno16–14-0.0219%25 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0313%25 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.045%25 Oct →
cache10–130.0211%25 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.0310%24 Oct →
nuke13–3-0.0814%24 Oct →
mirage13–90.0118%24 Oct →
mirage13–70.0712%24 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.019%24 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.079%24 Oct →
mirage13–4-0.0713%23 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.060%23 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0516%23 Oct →
dust213–110.0013%23 Oct →
inferno13–90.0614%23 Oct →
dust213–20.0515%23 Oct →
mirage11–130.049%23 Oct →
nuke6–130.0213%23 Oct →
nuke13–50.0719%22 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0411%22 Oct →
ancient15–15-0.0010%22 Oct →
inferno13–30.026%22 Oct →
nuke16–13-0.0110%22 Oct →
anubis13–50.0024%22 Oct →
mirage13–90.1012%22 Oct →
mirage10–130.0115%22 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0220%22 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0118%21 Oct →
cache2–90.0012%21 Oct →
mirage13–40.0213%21 Oct →
mirage13–00.0616%21 Oct →
anubis5–130.0411%21 Oct →
inferno13–60.0816%21 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.1214%20 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0320%20 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0213%20 Oct →
cache13–160.0210%20 Oct →
mirage13–90.029%20 Oct →
dust213–70.0421%20 Oct →
cache13–50.0015%20 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0510%20 Oct →
mirage13–60.0115%19 Oct →
nuke13–30.0321%19 Oct →
cache13–80.0313%19 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0513%19 Oct →
nuke13–70.0417%19 Oct →
mirage13–50.1017%19 Oct →
cache13–70.1517%19 Oct →
mirage4–130.043%19 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0621%18 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0316%18 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.029%18 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0512%18 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0613%18 Oct →
mirage8–4-0.0423%18 Oct →
anubis13–40.088%18 Oct →
inferno15–150.0117%16 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.067%16 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.0524%16 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0212%16 Oct →
inferno13–80.0817%15 Oct →
cache2–13-0.0416%15 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.044%15 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.037%15 Oct →
dust216–140.0118%15 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.084%15 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0211%15 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0312%15 Oct →
dust210–13-0.038%14 Oct →
mirage15–150.018%14 Oct →
ancient6–0-0.0514%14 Oct →
ancient0–13-0.1116%14 Oct →
cache13–20.0312%14 Oct →
mirage12–16-0.055%14 Oct →
mirage9–130.0210%14 Oct →
cache13–70.126%14 Oct →
mirage13–80.0228%13 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0116%13 Oct →
anubis13–3-0.0310%13 Oct →
mirage13–80.0918%13 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0732%13 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0110%12 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.038%12 Oct →
anubis13–5-0.099%12 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0112%12 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.048%11 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.029%11 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0110%11 Oct →
anubis15–150.0210%11 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.