bert

bert — CS2 Stats

CM76561198156142453[U:1:195876725]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

655Tracked matches56%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,179Hours in CS0Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidClutch Specialist
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Aug 2026 (43 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+1Tracked matches · now 655
0.0ppWin rate · 55.6% → 55.6%

Rating over time

36Days played since 2025-01-02

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches8——
Win rate13%——
K/D0.52——
Headshot %73%——

Measured 12 Sep 2026 → 10 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning50
Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD56–30–14Last 10056%Win rateTTWWLLWLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +3.8pp headshot accuracy · +84ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–1–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 36%
  • Avg reaction 739ms

Last 10

  • 3–4–3 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 704ms

Last 20

  • 9–7–4 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 662ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+4.7 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility3.4
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch10.0

Limited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 658ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.0
Utility3.4
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact6.9

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time662ms−28ms
first ⅓ avg 690ms → last ⅓ avg 662ms
Headshot accuracy30.2%+6.4%
first ⅓ avg 23.8% → last ⅓ avg 30.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 9–3 · poseidon, 10 May →
65%Best headshot accuracy · 8–8 · poseidon, 15 May →
484msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · ancient, 2 Jun →
13–1Biggest win · train, 1 Dec →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
10–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

trainBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
vertigoB115–645%0.01
mirageB105–550%0.04
poseidonA95–456%0.10
infernoS96–367%0.06
dust2S96–367%0.03
nukeD72–529%0.01
cacheB63–350%0.01
ancientD62–433%0.02
anubisD51–420%0.01
trainS54–180%0.08
overpass—44–0100%0.06
sanctum—44–0100%0.08
whistle—31–233%-0.04
palais—32–167%0.04
grail—21–150%0.04
eldorado—11–0100%0.08
debris—10–10%0.04
warden—10–10%-0.03
jura—11–0100%-0.06
agency—11–0100%0.02
edin—11–0100%0.06
basalt—11–0100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

400,253Lifetime kills
0.88K/D
11,776Matches
52.7%Match win rate · Top 10% of tracked players
64.5%Headshot % · Top 5% of tracked players
21.2%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of tracked players
16,759MVPs
25,499Hours (in match)
3,534Bombs planted
1,043Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47200,060
AWP28,605
SG 5534,817
P2504,163
MP73,699

Lifetime map wins

5,502inferno
4,229dust2
3,250italy
2,845cbble
2,130vertigo
2,085train
705nuke
451office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

321Matches
58%Win rate
1.25Avg K/D
63.3ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

100%1v1 clutch win
60%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4100%1.3517.0
Overpass2100%0.9014.5
Ancient250%0.7914.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.3%Headshot accuracy
31.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.5%Spray accuracy
86.2%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
658msReaction time
39.5%T opening success
37.3%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
7.44HE damage / grenade
3.74Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4666 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.5278% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke8–8-0.0840%5 Sept →
vertigo8–8-0.1511%12 Jul →
poseidon9–30.1660%12 Jul →
eldorado9–60.0817%12 Jul →
debris6–90.0450%12 Jul →
vertigo5–9-0.0731%3 Jul →
inferno9–50.1033%3 Jul →
nuke7–90.0225%3 Jul →
vertigo8–8-0.1021%3 Jul →
poseidon7–90.0832%3 Jul →
cache12–12-0.0524%13 Jun →
mirage13–40.1126%13 Jun →
overpass13–8-0.0326%13 Jun →
poseidon5–9-0.0824%7 Jun →
inferno3–9-0.0521%7 Jun →
cache13–80.0239%5 Jun →
sanctum9–50.1023%5 Jun →
poseidon9–20.1924%5 Jun →
vertigo7–9-0.1342%5 Jun →
nuke9–70.1733%5 Jun →
inferno9–10.2222%5 Jun →
mirage13–100.0736%5 Jun →
cache13–20.0624%5 Jun →
dust216–12-0.0620%2 Jun →
ancient10–13-0.0421%2 Jun →
mirage9–13-0.0321%2 Jun →
overpass9–70.1616%15 May →
sanctum9–30.1429%15 May →
nuke7–9-0.0517%15 May →
inferno6–9-0.0729%15 May →
vertigo8–8-0.0250%15 May →
poseidon8–8-0.0565%15 May →
poseidon9–30.2445%10 May →
inferno9–70.1433%10 May →
anubis6–130.0426%8 May →
cache7–130.0130%8 May →
cache13–110.0334%8 May →
warden4–13-0.0330%3 May →
cache12–12-0.0224%3 May →
poseidon9–20.2124%30 Apr →
sanctum9–40.0229%30 Apr →
inferno9–30.0720%25 Apr →
vertigo9–60.1928%25 Apr →
poseidon7–9-0.0830%25 Apr →
nuke8–8-0.0825%25 Apr →
sanctum9–30.0340%25 Apr →
poseidon9–50.2113%25 Apr →
dust25–13-0.0525%26 Feb →
inferno13–50.1335%1 Dec →
train13–10.1520%1 Dec →
mirage1–130.0632%1 Dec →
train13–110.0630%8 Sept →
ancient17–19-0.0126%24 Aug →
ancient13–3-0.0130%24 Aug →
overpass16–120.0031%24 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0225%23 Aug →
dust27–130.0129%23 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0325%15 Jun →
jura13–11-0.0630%7 Jun →
grail7–13-0.0322%10 May →
agency13–30.0221%8 May →
grail13–70.1125%8 May →
anubis12–12-0.0433%13 Apr →
dust213–20.1523%13 Apr →
anubis13–100.0622%12 Apr →
mirage8–130.0731%12 Apr →
dust28–130.0318%7 Apr →
train11–13-0.0033%7 Apr →
dust216–120.0436%7 Apr →
vertigo13–40.0521%6 Apr →
train13–50.0533%6 Apr →
anubis0–3-0.010%5 Apr →
ancient8–130.0315%5 Apr →
dust213–70.0923%5 Apr →
mirage14–16-0.0028%4 Apr →
mirage12–120.0216%25 Mar →
ancient13–20.1818%25 Mar →
edin13–10.0629%25 Mar →
basalt13–60.0921%23 Mar →
dust213–10-0.0229%23 Mar →
mirage13–6-0.0115%19 Mar →
dust213–20.0417%19 Mar →
vertigo9–40.1819%18 Mar →
inferno5–9-0.0129%18 Mar →
mirage13–110.1121%18 Mar →
train13–60.1245%18 Mar →
mirage13–11-0.0322%21 Feb →
overpass9–30.1012%18 Jan →
whistle9–70.0242%18 Jan →
palais9–60.0532%18 Jan →
vertigo9–20.1525%18 Jan →
whistle2–9-0.2022%4 Jan →
whistle8–80.0540%4 Jan →
palais9–7-0.0024%4 Jan →
vertigo8–80.0517%4 Jan →
nuke8–8-0.0416%4 Jan →
inferno9–6-0.0118%4 Jan →
vertigo9–6-0.0428%2 Jan →
palais8–80.0915%2 Jan →
nuke9–40.1524%2 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.