_rittoner

_rittoner — CS2 Stats

PL76561198156036453[U:1:195770725]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

907Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,277Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating23,641Top 25% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#31773 of 220668 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,112 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 45 days played since 25 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,641 +1,728 7 Apr11 Sept · 11 days played
19,99923,641peak 23,6417 Apr11 Sept
23,641Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,112Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
45Days played since 2026-01-25

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,112
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 388 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-06
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-06

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 23,641
  • +2,472 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1,359 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,569), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate43.6%48.3%51.0%7.4% short
Shot accuracy16.9%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.911.071.090.18 short
Match win rate44.4%46.9%48.4%4.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG_rittonerFACEITLevel 9 · 2,112 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER23,641 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,112csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning47
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41554Last 10041%Win rateWWWLWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.4pp headshot accuracy · −21ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 535ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 546ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility4.7
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 552ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning4.7
Utility4.7
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact1.0

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time542ms−81ms
first ⅓ avg 623ms → last ⅓ avg 542ms
Headshot accuracy17.4%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 16.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–10 · nuke, 3 Jul
30%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · cache, 26 May
438msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · anubis, 26 Jul
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 12 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W3Current streak
612In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 69% over 13anubisWeakest map · 10% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB24111346%-0.01
dust2B22101245%-0.00
ancientS139469%-0.00
anubisD101910%-0.02
nukeD93633%0.02
cacheC73443%-0.03
infernoD51420%-0.00
train3030%-0.01
overpass32167%-0.01
vertigo21150%0.05
office2020%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (10% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

151,652Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
6,890Matches
44.4%Match win rate
43.6%Headshot %
16.9%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 9 players
14,621MVPs
2,884Hours (in match)
6,228Bombs planted
1,181Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4750,666
AWP12,503
FAMAS3,430
P903,345
P2503,259

Lifetime map wins

12,958dust2
5,495inferno
2,478nuke
2,319train
1,774vertigo
1,012cbble
206lake
109safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,337Matches
51%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
76.0ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust210354%1.0515.6
Mirage9952%0.9915.8
Ancient6549%0.9415.8
Inferno3656%1.1716.0
Anubis2955%0.9815.0
Nuke1533%0.8915.7
Overpass667%1.1514.8
Train520%1.1215.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
76.7%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
552msReaction time
28.6%T opening success
46.1%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
2.8%Flash assists
8.11HE damage / grenade
8.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.6185% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

10% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–80.0021%11 Sept
dust213–6-0.0313%11 Sept
nuke13–80.0212%11 Sept
cache9–13-0.0321%28 Aug
ancient16–130.0018%28 Aug
mirage13–20.0022%28 Aug
dust210–13-0.0523%20 Aug
dust211–13-0.0314%20 Aug
dust213–9-0.0013%18 Aug
dust210–13-0.0527%18 Aug
dust213–110.0110%13 Aug
train6–13-0.0712%13 Aug
train7–13-0.0013%13 Aug
train10–130.0520%13 Aug
dust29–130.0526%11 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0325%11 Aug
ancient13–2-0.0326%11 Aug
dust26–13-0.0815%6 Aug
mirage8–130.0415%4 Aug
vertigo13–70.0217%4 Aug
vertigo12–120.0818%4 Aug
overpass8–130.0526%26 Jul
anubis10–13-0.019%26 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0119%26 Jul
dust213–90.0620%25 Jul
dust213–160.0119%21 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0013%21 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0629%20 Jul
mirage17–190.0013%17 Jul
anubis7–13-0.1013%15 Jul
inferno6–0-0.010%15 Jul
ancient13–80.0518%15 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0215%14 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0320%14 Jul
ancient11–130.0518%14 Jul
office12–120.0116%9 Jul
office8–13-0.0421%9 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0611%4 Jul
dust213–100.049%4 Jul
nuke13–20.1020%4 Jul
nuke13–100.1322%3 Jul
anubis12–16-0.0010%3 Jul
dust213–110.0117%1 Jul
mirage13–80.0319%1 Jul
mirage11–130.0412%1 Jul
cache13–7-0.0415%26 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0414%16 Jun
dust26–13-0.0018%16 Jun
dust22–13-0.0411%16 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0720%14 Jun
dust213–100.0718%6 Jun
mirage13–80.0213%6 Jun
anubis9–130.019%6 Jun
inferno11–130.0613%6 Jun
nuke14–160.0116%6 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0012%6 Jun
inferno6–13-0.037%5 Jun
mirage10–13-0.009%29 May
mirage9–13-0.0115%29 May
dust24–130.0116%29 May
mirage9–13-0.0315%29 May
dust213–40.0315%29 May
cache12–12-0.0027%26 May
cache13–10-0.0230%26 May
dust214–160.0219%21 May
mirage13–90.0421%21 May
mirage5–13-0.055%17 May
dust213–4-0.0419%17 May
ancient16–14-0.0111%17 May
cache13–11-0.0619%3 May
cache10–13-0.0919%3 May
cache11–130.0319%3 May
dust23–13-0.0312%3 May
anubis10–13-0.0412%13 Apr
dust28–13-0.0310%13 Apr
overpass13–10-0.0113%13 Apr
ancient13–110.0111%7 Apr
ancient13–80.0124%7 Apr
inferno5–130.0422%7 Apr
mirage11–13-0.074%29 Mar
ancient9–13-0.0114%25 Mar
mirage13–5-0.0423%24 Mar
nuke12–120.0123%24 Mar
overpass13–6-0.0617%12 Mar
mirage13–1-0.0621%12 Mar
nuke11–130.0423%12 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0616%22 Feb
nuke10–130.0220%21 Feb
nuke2–13-0.0614%20 Feb
mirage14–16-0.0218%15 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0012%5 Feb
dust216–140.0519%5 Feb
ancient13–4-0.007%2 Feb
nuke6–13-0.0812%2 Feb
anubis6–13-0.0621%1 Feb
ancient6–130.0221%1 Feb
anubis10–130.0419%29 Jan
mirage13–40.0723%29 Jan
mirage13–7-0.0020%27 Jan
ancient13–1-0.056%25 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →