grillo

grillo — CS2 Stats

BR76561198154095163[U:1:193829435]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,585Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating26,552Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1142 of 14552 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

26,552Peak Premier on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 26,552
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 3,448 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGgrilloPREMIER26,552 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91
Positioning50
Utility73

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5644Last 10056%Win rateLLWLWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim9.1
Aggression3.4
Utility7.3
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels0.2
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.7° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 41 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1
Positioning5.0
Utility7.3
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact6.1

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time539ms+3ms
first ⅓ avg 536ms → last ⅓ avg 539ms
Headshot accuracy27.4%+4.4%
first ⅓ avg 23.1% → last ⅓ avg 27.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — dust2 13–5
131Biggest win — ancient
9Longest win streak
L2Current streak
89In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 70% over 10cacheWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B26141254%0.01
ancientA138562%0.01
infernoS128467%0.00
nukeB126650%-0.02
overpassA117464%-0.01
anubisS107370%-0.01
mirageC104640%0.01
cacheD62433%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

975Matches
67%Win rate
1.35Avg K/D
86.0ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
21Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust212068%1.3717.7
Ancient11777%1.4116.0
Mirage11556%1.1716.0
Anubis6080%1.2715.7
Nuke5262%1.1916.4
Vertigo2479%1.5215.8
Overpass2075%1.5216.1
Inferno1850%0.9213.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.0%Headshot accuracy
38.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.7%Spray accuracy
86.1%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
530msReaction time
21.7%T opening success
39.6%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
12.5%Flash assists
7.83HE damage / grenade
15.70Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.6613% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust25–13-0.0621%8 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0643%8 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0521%8 Aug
cache11–13-0.0233%5 Aug
ancient13–10.0725%5 Aug
anubis22–20-0.0226%5 Aug
ancient13–20.0932%4 Aug
cache9–13-0.0024%4 Aug
dust26–13-0.0030%4 Aug
cache10–13-0.0329%10 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0328%10 Jul
anubis13–110.0123%9 Jul
ancient13–50.0722%9 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0432%8 Jul
dust213–90.0314%8 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0633%8 Jul
dust28–13-0.0720%7 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0512%7 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0913%7 Jul
overpass5–13-0.1014%29 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0037%29 Jun
inferno2–13-0.0238%29 Jun
dust213–50.1631%28 Jun
inferno13–90.0720%28 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0127%28 Jun
overpass13–8-0.0126%27 Jun
ancient13–90.0837%27 Jun
ancient13–110.0347%25 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0027%25 Jun
dust213–80.0030%24 Jun
inferno13–50.0527%24 Jun
dust213–100.0442%1 Jun
dust213–50.0126%30 May
anubis9–13-0.0317%30 May
overpass9–13-0.0820%30 May
dust26–13-0.0714%23 May
nuke13–20.0221%23 May
overpass13–30.0128%23 May
nuke13–60.0330%22 May
anubis13–6-0.0125%22 May
dust24–13-0.0318%22 May
anubis13–60.0229%22 May
overpass10–13-0.0316%22 May
inferno13–3-0.0227%19 May
anubis13–50.0332%19 May
inferno13–40.0129%18 May
dust213–30.0523%18 May
inferno13–40.0129%18 May
mirage11–13-0.0016%17 May
inferno8–13-0.0617%17 May
dust211–13-0.0227%14 May
nuke10–13-0.0723%14 May
mirage13–110.0315%13 May
dust213–11-0.0318%13 May
overpass13–50.1018%10 May
dust213–50.0529%10 May
inferno14–16-0.0233%9 May
dust213–70.0429%9 May
anubis13–9-0.0314%9 May
inferno13–100.0426%8 May
mirage8–130.0532%8 May
dust27–130.0028%8 May
cache3–13-0.0031%6 May
overpass13–110.0123%5 May
dust213–100.0119%5 May
mirage11–13-0.0019%5 May
overpass13–8-0.0336%3 May
nuke13–10-0.0220%3 May
dust219–170.0116%2 May
mirage13–4-0.0044%2 May
cache13–80.0225%1 May
cache5–0-0.020%1 May
inferno13–70.0418%29 Apr
dust213–7-0.0118%29 Apr
mirage13–40.1333%25 Apr
dust210–130.0734%24 Apr
dust214–160.1326%21 Apr
dust213–30.1118%20 Apr
ancient3–13-0.0421%4 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0525%4 Apr
dust210–13-0.0428%3 Apr
ancient13–40.0719%3 Apr
anubis13–8-0.0028%3 Apr
overpass13–60.0920%1 Apr
nuke13–16-0.0020%1 Apr
anubis2–13-0.0620%1 Apr
dust24–13-0.0728%28 Mar
overpass13–16-0.0127%28 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0925%27 Mar
ancient3–13-0.0613%27 Mar
nuke13–8-0.0120%27 Mar
dust29–13-0.0341%21 Mar
nuke14–16-0.0122%21 Mar
ancient13–8-0.0222%20 Mar
dust213–80.0223%20 Mar
mirage11–130.0418%18 Mar
mirage16–13-0.0420%17 Mar
overpass13–11-0.0215%7 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0020%7 Mar
nuke8–13-0.0733%7 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →