SENER1 — CS2 Stats

PROFree AgentKosovoRiflerSettings & gear profile →

XK76561198152378187[U:1:192112459]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,359Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.3 SolidHybrid Rifler

CSDB Leaderboard#7706 of 9695 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 3,666 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

3,666Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

At peak — 3,666
Next: 4,000 ELO at 4,000 — 334 to go
Reached: 3,500 ELO · 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10
3,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76

Positioning57

Utility75

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–48Last 10052%Win rateWLWWLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.6

Aggression5.7

Utility7.5

Positioning5.7

Opening Duels3.5

Clutch3.4

High utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 75 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6

Positioning5.7

Utility7.5

Mechanics5.5

Opening Duels3.5

Win Impact2.8

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time496ms−19ms

first ⅓ avg 515ms → last ⅓ avg 496ms

Headshot accuracy20.4%−0.5%

first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 20.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — nuke 13–5

13–0Biggest win — mirage

7Longest win streak

6–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 71% over 21anubisWeakest map · 33% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	26	10–16	38%	0.01
dust2	S	21	15–6	71%	-0.00
inferno	A	16	10–6	63%	-0.01
ancient	B	15	7–8	47%	-0.01
anubis	D	9	3–6	33%	-0.00
nuke	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.01
overpass	A	5	3–2	60%	-0.01
cache	—	1	1–0	100%	0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

10,513Matches

63%Win rate

1.30Avg K/D

82.8ADR

54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

25%1v2 clutch win

33Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	955	56%	1.12	15.4
Ancient	797	60%	1.19	16.6
Dust2	442	57%	1.16	15.6
Anubis	427	61%	1.17	16.3
Inferno	140	60%	1.22	15.8
Vertigo	39	51%	1.06	15.5
Overpass	28	64%	1.27	17.1
Train	23	65%	1.02	13.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Inventory

$71Inventory value5ItemsFull inventory breakdown →

$70

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy

33.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

42.8%Spray accuracy

74.6%Counter-strafing

10.5°Preaim

496msReaction time

37.9%T opening success

50.3%CT opening success

0.57Enemies flashed / flash

5.7%Flash assists

12.75HE damage / grenade

16.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 37.9236% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–8	0.08	23%	11 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.05	25%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.01	22%	4 Aug →
anubis	13–6	-0.01	13%	30 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.00	20%	29 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	17%	15 May →
dust2	13–4	0.05	20%	15 May →
ancient	4–13	-0.01	23%	15 May →
inferno	13–5	0.02	14%	14 May →
mirage	9–13	0.00	25%	14 May →
dust2	6–13	-0.06	27%	14 May →
inferno	9–13	-0.02	22%	2 May →
dust2	2–13	-0.07	27%	2 May →
nuke	13–11	0.02	25%	2 May →
anubis	16–12	0.01	19%	1 May →
dust2	13–9	0.03	23%	1 May →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	17%	1 May →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	21%	30 Apr →
ancient	7–13	-0.03	23%	30 Apr →
anubis	16–14	0.02	19%	29 Apr →
mirage	13–5	0.05	25%	29 Apr →
mirage	13–5	0.04	15%	26 Apr →
overpass	6–13	0.05	19%	26 Apr →
anubis	10–13	-0.01	13%	26 Apr →
nuke	7–13	-0.03	20%	24 Apr →
ancient	13–6	0.05	9%	23 Apr →
mirage	13–3	0.06	26%	23 Apr →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	18%	19 Apr →
inferno	5–13	-0.03	19%	19 Apr →
ancient	8–13	0.01	16%	17 Apr →
mirage	3–13	-0.09	29%	17 Apr →
anubis	11–13	-0.03	24%	15 Apr →
dust2	4–13	-0.04	19%	15 Apr →
mirage	13–2	-0.01	25%	12 Apr →
overpass	13–11	-0.05	21%	12 Apr →
inferno	13–7	-0.05	16%	10 Apr →
nuke	11–13	-0.06	16%	10 Apr →
dust2	22–18	-0.04	23%	10 Apr →
anubis	13–16	-0.02	13%	9 Apr →
dust2	13–3	0.01	18%	9 Apr →
inferno	13–7	0.03	31%	9 Apr →
dust2	9–13	-0.05	14%	6 Apr →
dust2	13–9	0.03	25%	5 Apr →
inferno	13–6	0.03	14%	5 Apr →
ancient	3–13	-0.07	17%	4 Apr →
dust2	13–7	-0.05	23%	4 Apr →
mirage	13–6	0.04	7%	4 Apr →
mirage	10–13	-0.00	26%	3 Apr →
ancient	4–13	-0.03	26%	3 Apr →
dust2	13–8	-0.07	19%	1 Apr →
overpass	8–13	-0.07	23%	31 Mar →
inferno	8–13	-0.01	15%	31 Mar →
dust2	13–6	0.05	28%	30 Mar →
anubis	10–13	0.02	17%	30 Mar →
ancient	13–5	-0.03	21%	30 Mar →
dust2	13–6	0.06	18%	27 Mar →
inferno	13–9	-0.02	17%	27 Mar →
inferno	13–3	0.06	22%	26 Mar →
dust2	13–2	0.03	19%	26 Mar →
mirage	14–16	-0.01	19%	25 Mar →
ancient	9–13	0.04	13%	25 Mar →
inferno	13–11	-0.01	16%	25 Mar →
dust2	13–9	-0.00	19%	25 Mar →
inferno	13–11	-0.02	18%	25 Mar →
anubis	5–13	-0.01	20%	25 Mar →
dust2	13–4	0.02	29%	23 Mar →
mirage	3–13	0.05	33%	23 Mar →
nuke	5–13	-0.05	23%	23 Mar →
ancient	13–8	0.09	35%	22 Mar →
anubis	8–13	0.01	30%	22 Mar →
mirage	7–13	-0.08	17%	22 Mar →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	19%	21 Mar →
inferno	13–3	0.06	19%	21 Mar →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	17%	21 Mar →
inferno	9–13	-0.02	21%	21 Mar →
overpass	13–4	0.04	24%	21 Mar →
ancient	13–6	-0.06	15%	20 Mar →
dust2	13–2	0.02	15%	20 Mar →
ancient	16–12	-0.05	12%	20 Mar →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	33%	20 Mar →
dust2	13–2	0.08	22%	18 Mar →
nuke	13–5	-0.01	18%	18 Mar →
mirage	19–22	0.06	18%	17 Mar →
inferno	5–13	-0.00	26%	17 Mar →
overpass	13–7	-0.02	22%	16 Mar →
inferno	13–5	-0.01	17%	16 Mar →
mirage	13–0	0.11	17%	16 Mar →
mirage	16–13	-0.00	19%	15 Mar →
mirage	13–7	0.06	29%	13 Mar →
nuke	13–5	0.11	25%	13 Mar →
ancient	13–7	-0.01	7%	12 Mar →
mirage	8–13	-0.00	24%	9 Mar →
nuke	10–13	-0.02	19%	9 Mar →
ancient	2–13	-0.07	25%	7 Mar →
dust2	13–4	0.01	12%	7 Mar →
dust2	7–13	0.03	29%	26 Feb →
inferno	6–13	-0.10	3%	26 Feb →
mirage	9–13	0.01	22%	26 Feb →
dust2	5–13	-0.07	31%	26 Feb →
ancient	13–7	0.04	25%	25 Feb →