TJ

TJ — CS2 Stats

76561198149129146[U:1:188863418]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,992Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating18,657Top 50% of 200,982 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~13.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#98595 of 247930 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,933 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 27 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,657 -453 2 Aug – 27 Sept · 38 days played
17,58821,313peak 21,3132 Aug27 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,933 +0 6 Sept – 13 Sept · 2 observations
1,9331,933peak 1,9336 Sept13 Sept
21,446Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,933Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2026-07-26

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,933
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 68 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-06
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-06

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,656 below peak (21,313)
  • +14 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,343 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-06
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTJFACEITLevel 9 · 1,933 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER18,657 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,933csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning59
Utility73

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–50–3Last 10047%Win rateWLWTWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −5.6pp headshot accuracy · +56ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 582ms

Last 20

  • 10–8–2 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 554ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.4 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility7.3
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 56% on T to 37% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 564ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning5.9
Utility7.3
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time557ms−77ms
first ⅓ avg 634ms → last ⅓ avg 557ms
Headshot accuracy19.1%−2.7%
first ⅓ avg 21.8% → last ⅓ avg 19.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–2 · dust2, 4 Sept →
57%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · dust2, 28 Jul →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · ancient, 15 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 4 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
12–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 86% over 7dust2Weakest map · 32% over 34
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D3411–2332%-0.01
infernoB2614–1254%0.01
cacheS128–467%0.02
ancientC114–736%0.02
mirageS76–186%0.04
anubisC52–340%0.02
nukeC52–340%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 34). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,723Matches
51%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
73.1ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

13%1v1 clutch win
6%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1486%1.4118.5
Mirage1362%0.9913.8
Dust2757%0.9511.7
Ancient743%1.5716.4
Overpass450%1.2814.3
Anubis475%1.0719.0
Nuke20%1.1215.5
Vertigo2100%0.7515.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.9%Headshot accuracy
30.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.8%Spray accuracy
80.0%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
564msReaction time
55.8%T opening success
37.4%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
8.3%Flash assists
9.66HE damage / grenade
17.82Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 37.4201% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 34 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–70.0313%27 Sept →
dust24–130.008%26 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0220%26 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0227%25 Sept →
mirage13–40.0534%23 Sept →
inferno3–2-0.0217%23 Sept →
inferno10–130.0313%21 Sept →
inferno14–160.0413%20 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.026%19 Sept →
cache13–80.0516%19 Sept →
ancient8–130.0125%18 Sept →
inferno15–15-0.0515%17 Sept →
anubis9–130.0926%16 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0236%16 Sept →
ancient13–80.0721%15 Sept →
ancient13–50.1118%15 Sept →
cache13–30.0425%15 Sept →
inferno16–140.0015%14 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0611%12 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0231%12 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0121%12 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0227%11 Sept →
dust24–13-0.069%10 Sept →
nuke15–150.0124%10 Sept →
inferno4–130.0214%9 Sept →
ancient13–110.0111%5 Sept →
cache13–60.0612%5 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0429%4 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0113%4 Sept →
inferno8–130.0821%4 Sept →
anubis13–70.0419%4 Sept →
dust213–20.1725%4 Sept →
inferno14–16-0.0314%3 Sept →
dust213–40.025%1 Sept →
mirage13–110.0525%31 Aug →
ancient10–130.0022%30 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0424%30 Aug →
dust212–16-0.0419%27 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0331%27 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0114%23 Aug →
mirage13–80.0318%23 Aug →
inferno13–90.0119%22 Aug →
dust213–4-0.0524%22 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0134%22 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0321%21 Aug →
dust213–50.1219%21 Aug →
ancient13–90.0123%21 Aug →
cache13–80.0729%21 Aug →
mirage13–30.0743%21 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0311%21 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0441%20 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0814%18 Aug →
dust216–130.0524%17 Aug →
ancient9–130.0224%17 Aug →
dust211–130.0226%16 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0414%16 Aug →
ancient14–16-0.0113%16 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0035%15 Aug →
inferno13–100.0632%15 Aug →
dust211–130.0117%14 Aug →
dust27–130.0020%14 Aug →
nuke13–16-0.0512%8 Aug →
inferno13–20.0420%8 Aug →
nuke13–70.0314%8 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0733%8 Aug →
inferno16–120.0617%8 Aug →
dust213–5-0.036%8 Aug →
cache13–50.0228%8 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0210%8 Aug →
inferno13–110.029%7 Aug →
cache11–130.0019%7 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0621%7 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0526%6 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0026%6 Aug →
inferno16–120.0412%6 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0218%5 Aug →
mirage13–40.0521%5 Aug →
inferno15–130.0217%5 Aug →
dust25–130.0222%5 Aug →
ancient7–130.0714%3 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0037%3 Aug →
inferno13–110.0124%2 Aug →
cache13–20.0823%2 Aug →
inferno13–40.1021%2 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0331%1 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0223%1 Aug →
dust210–130.1131%31 Jul →
inferno14–160.0613%31 Jul →
cache3–13-0.0413%29 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0017%29 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0211%28 Jul →
dust22–13-0.0957%28 Jul →
cache13–70.0319%28 Jul →
dust29–130.0117%27 Jul →
inferno13–60.048%27 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0217%27 Jul →
nuke13–110.0629%27 Jul →
mirage13–90.0216%26 Jul →
dust216–14-0.0539%26 Jul →
inferno13–80.0129%26 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.