OPJames

OPJames — CS2 Stats

GB76561198145633311[U:1:185367583]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,292Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Sep 2026 (18 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,676 → 2,676
+1Tracked matches · now 1,292
0.0ppWin rate · 53.3% → 53.3%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 2,676 +0 3 Sept – 25 Sept · 2 observations
2,6762,676peak 2,6763 Sept25 Sept
2,676Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
37Days played since 2026-03-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,676
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 324 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGOPJamesPEAK ELO2,676csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning48
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT48–52Last 10048%Win rateLWWLLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · +0.9pp headshot accuracy · −6ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 546ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility6.4
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning4.8
Utility6.4
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time528ms−80ms
first ⅓ avg 608ms → last ⅓ avg 528ms
Headshot accuracy18.6%−0.6%
first ⅓ avg 19.2% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–3 · anubis, 30 Aug →
31%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · mirage, 7 Apr →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · overpass, 24 Mar →
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 21 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
10–15In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 54% over 26infernoWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB2614–1254%0.01
dust2B2312–1152%-0.00
mirageB2110–1148%0.00
anubisB115–645%0.01
infernoC114–736%-0.02
overpassC83–538%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

749Matches
55%Win rate
1.32Avg K/D
88.1ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage18054%1.2718.6
Dust215757%1.2517.8
Ancient13755%1.2818.8
Inferno4941%1.1415.3
Overpass4549%1.3317.7
Anubis4159%1.3518.0
Nuke1861%1.1715.6
Train1145%1.1717.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy
36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.5%Spray accuracy
87.3%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
542msReaction time
25.8%T opening success
50.3%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
11.3%Flash assists
9.22HE damage / grenade
7.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.7533% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust211–13-0.0013%31 Aug →
ancient13–110.0421%30 Aug →
anubis13–30.1523%30 Aug →
inferno8–130.0426%30 Aug →
dust28–130.0019%26 Aug →
mirage13–50.0721%29 May →
dust213–11-0.0321%29 May →
ancient13–80.0119%28 May →
dust213–9-0.0310%28 May →
dust213–2-0.0318%21 May →
ancient23–25-0.0120%13 May →
mirage19–16-0.0018%13 May →
mirage10–13-0.0323%13 May →
dust28–13-0.0516%11 May →
overpass6–13-0.0128%11 May →
overpass6–13-0.068%6 May →
dust213–4-0.0321%4 May →
ancient13–40.0527%4 May →
inferno5–13-0.0911%4 May →
ancient13–7-0.0210%2 May →
anubis13–90.0317%2 May →
ancient9–13-0.069%29 Apr →
mirage6–13-0.0519%29 Apr →
ancient8–13-0.0121%29 Apr →
inferno13–2-0.0915%27 Apr →
mirage10–13-0.0515%27 Apr →
mirage13–11-0.0024%26 Apr →
inferno13–110.0016%26 Apr →
ancient13–8-0.0519%26 Apr →
mirage10–13-0.0618%24 Apr →
mirage10–13-0.0125%24 Apr →
mirage13–60.0324%22 Apr →
ancient13–80.0820%22 Apr →
mirage11–13-0.0025%20 Apr →
ancient13–8-0.0016%20 Apr →
dust216–12-0.0511%20 Apr →
dust29–13-0.0216%20 Apr →
overpass6–13-0.0225%15 Apr →
ancient13–70.0116%15 Apr →
overpass9–13-0.0121%10 Apr →
dust213–100.0124%10 Apr →
overpass13–9-0.0715%9 Apr →
ancient13–30.0215%9 Apr →
overpass13–7-0.0120%8 Apr →
ancient13–90.0410%8 Apr →
inferno11–13-0.0427%8 Apr →
mirage8–130.0021%7 Apr →
dust213–90.0422%7 Apr →
mirage13–30.0131%7 Apr →
inferno8–130.0317%7 Apr →
mirage14–16-0.0125%6 Apr →
ancient11–13-0.0019%6 Apr →
inferno13–10-0.0113%6 Apr →
dust213–160.0324%30 Mar →
overpass8–130.0413%29 Mar →
ancient6–13-0.0231%29 Mar →
ancient13–5-0.0114%26 Mar →
mirage13–70.0610%26 Mar →
inferno13–70.0028%26 Mar →
mirage10–130.0418%25 Mar →
anubis16–190.0417%25 Mar →
dust213–80.0520%25 Mar →
ancient3–13-0.0422%25 Mar →
anubis13–7-0.0112%25 Mar →
dust29–130.0015%25 Mar →
dust216–140.0124%25 Mar →
ancient10–13-0.0220%24 Mar →
dust225–220.0423%24 Mar →
overpass13–20.0212%24 Mar →
dust25–13-0.0322%24 Mar →
inferno10–13-0.0221%24 Mar →
ancient14–160.0727%24 Mar →
dust216–130.0117%23 Mar →
anubis13–90.0119%23 Mar →
anubis10–13-0.0315%19 Mar →
dust211–13-0.0116%19 Mar →
ancient13–110.0525%19 Mar →
mirage16–140.0621%19 Mar →
dust27–13-0.0118%19 Mar →
mirage13–6-0.0414%18 Mar →
dust28–130.0720%18 Mar →
anubis10–13-0.0519%17 Mar →
ancient13–90.0326%17 Mar →
mirage13–11-0.0318%17 Mar →
anubis13–110.0222%16 Mar →
mirage8–13-0.0116%16 Mar →
inferno14–16-0.0118%16 Mar →
dust216–14-0.0114%13 Mar →
anubis11–13-0.0122%12 Mar →
dust26–13-0.0430%12 Mar →
mirage13–40.0115%12 Mar →
ancient13–16-0.0313%12 Mar →
anubis11–13-0.0321%11 Mar →
mirage11–130.0419%11 Mar →
ancient13–160.0525%11 Mar →
inferno11–130.0227%11 Mar →
ancient13–4-0.0123%11 Mar →
anubis7–13-0.0616%9 Mar →
ancient14–160.0420%9 Mar →
ancient0–2-0.030%9 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.