tomae

tomae — CS2 Stats

AU76561198143059809[U:1:182794081]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,952Tracked matches33%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating26,110Top 10% of 210,367 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#12535 of 257521 tracked
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,110 +2,743 13 Sept – 25 Oct · 26 days played
23,36728,026peak 28,02613 Sept25 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,877 +0 13 Sept – 25 Sept · 2 observations
1,8771,877peak 1,87713 Sept25 Sept
28,026Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,877Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
24Days played since 2026-09-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,877
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 124 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-13
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-13

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,916 below peak (28,026)
  • +1,110 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,890 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-25
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtomaePREMIER26,110 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,877csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91
Positioning70
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY40–56–4Last 10040%Win rateWWLLLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +1.9pp headshot accuracy · +33ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 554ms

Last 20

  • 5–15 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 537ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim9.1
Utility5.0
Positioning7.0
Opening Duels5.6
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 60% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1
Positioning7.0
Utility5.0
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels6.8
Win Impact0.0

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time545ms+61ms
first ⅓ avg 484ms → last ⅓ avg 545ms
Headshot accuracy24.8%−6.6%
first ⅓ avg 31.4% → last ⅓ avg 24.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–3 · inferno, 16 Oct →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 0–4 · mirage, 1 Oct →
391msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · inferno, 12 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 1 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
6–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 63% over 8infernoWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2312–1152%0.03
ancientC229–1341%0.04
dust2D196–1332%0.03
anubisD154–1127%0.03
infernoD92–722%0.04
cacheA85–363%0.03
nuke—42–250%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

606Matches
53%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
81.8ADR
57%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7262%1.0716.9
Dust24844%1.0416.9
Ancient4050%1.0615.1
Inferno2035%1.0017.0
Nuke757%0.9416.4
Overpass743%1.2321.0
Anubis757%1.2621.4
Train250%0.8514.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.3%Headshot accuracy
37.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.4%Spray accuracy
87.4%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
541msReaction time
60.0%T opening success
54.4%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
2.8%Flash assists
6.13HE damage / grenade
6.65Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–10.0920%25 Oct →
mirage13–90.1226%25 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0224%25 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0130%25 Oct →
ancient11–130.0529%25 Oct →
cache13–50.0531%25 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0329%24 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0019%24 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0520%24 Oct →
anubis12–160.0427%24 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0019%24 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0032%24 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0023%24 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0132%24 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0317%23 Oct →
mirage11–130.0111%22 Oct →
ancient4–130.0933%22 Oct →
dust213–60.0514%22 Oct →
mirage4–130.0224%21 Oct →
dust26–130.1030%21 Oct →
ancient10–130.0528%21 Oct →
mirage10–130.0425%21 Oct →
dust213–80.0823%20 Oct →
mirage13–70.0025%20 Oct →
mirage13–50.0124%20 Oct →
dust27–130.0529%20 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0218%19 Oct →
mirage13–100.0225%19 Oct →
ancient10–130.0522%19 Oct →
anubis0–13-0.0623%19 Oct →
nuke15–150.1141%18 Oct →
cache13–110.0228%18 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0418%18 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0321%18 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0521%18 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0133%18 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0341%17 Oct →
mirage13–40.0630%17 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0339%17 Oct →
dust210–130.0133%17 Oct →
anubis10–130.0234%17 Oct →
cache13–80.0627%17 Oct →
nuke13–90.0631%17 Oct →
dust213–70.0316%17 Oct →
mirage13–90.0426%17 Oct →
inferno15–150.1033%16 Oct →
ancient13–90.1027%16 Oct →
inferno13–30.2132%16 Oct →
dust215–150.0827%16 Oct →
cache13–70.0321%15 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0414%15 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0022%15 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.0528%15 Oct →
anubis3–130.0433%15 Oct →
ancient13–100.0712%15 Oct →
dust213–40.0724%15 Oct →
anubis13–30.0927%15 Oct →
nuke13–100.1021%15 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0422%15 Oct →
dust27–130.0132%14 Oct →
dust213–70.0719%14 Oct →
ancient10–130.0631%14 Oct →
cache10–130.0722%14 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0427%14 Oct →
dust22–13-0.1130%13 Oct →
mirage13–40.1334%13 Oct →
anubis13–80.0422%13 Oct →
dust214–160.1240%13 Oct →
anubis13–110.0227%12 Oct →
inferno7–130.0125%12 Oct →
inferno8–130.0131%11 Oct →
anubis5–130.0532%11 Oct →
anubis14–160.0424%11 Oct →
ancient13–110.1133%11 Oct →
cache10–130.0214%8 Oct →
anubis12–160.1125%8 Oct →
mirage11–130.0131%7 Oct →
ancient3–130.0636%7 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0124%7 Oct →
ancient13–20.0526%5 Oct →
ancient13–110.0627%5 Oct →
mirage12–160.0127%3 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0135%3 Oct →
ancient16–13-0.0050%3 Oct →
inferno6–130.0237%3 Oct →
mirage13–80.0233%1 Oct →
anubis13–00.1833%1 Oct →
mirage0–4-0.0367%1 Oct →
ancient7–130.0725%1 Oct →
mirage13–100.0625%30 Sept →
mirage13–60.0832%30 Sept →
dust27–130.0342%30 Sept →
anubis8–130.0126%29 Sept →
ancient13–40.0735%29 Sept →
inferno13–60.0638%29 Sept →
cache13–80.0118%29 Sept →
nuke11–130.0339%27 Sept →
mirage13–00.1827%27 Sept →
ancient9–130.1123%26 Sept →
dust215–150.0629%26 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.