Frimzeuz

Frimzeuz — CS2 Stats

FI76561198142863618[U:1:182597890]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,609Tracked matches67%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.9 Developing
CSDB Leaderboard#54950 of 61178 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,052 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

2,052Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,052
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 448 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFrimzeuzFACEITLevel 9 · 2,052 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO2,052csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim49
Positioning44
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT57394Last 10057%Win rateWWWWLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.9
Aggression5.0
Utility4.7
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.9
Positioning4.4
Utility4.7
Mechanics4.7
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact10.0

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time579ms+8ms
first ⅓ avg 571ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms
Headshot accuracy17.3%+3.9%
first ⅓ avg 13.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — stronghold 8–0
130Biggest win — ancient
6Longest win streak
W4Current streak
104In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 88% over 8dust2Weakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS2619773%-0.01
trainD1861233%-0.02
dust2D92722%-0.02
ancientS96367%-0.01
vertigoS87188%0.00
infernoC83538%-0.03
overpassA85363%-0.02
anubis21150%-0.07
mirage2020%-0.12
brewery220100%0.00
edin220100%0.03
cache110100%-0.04
italy110100%0.08
stronghold110100%0.10
warden110100%0.02
jura1010%0.00
basalt1010%-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,836Matches
54%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
67.0ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke44261%0.8912.8
Inferno39249%0.8912.9
Dust232450%0.9213.0
Train29161%0.8412.6
Ancient26047%0.9213.7
Mirage20159%1.1114.7
Anubis12454%0.9914.7
Overpass11453%0.8612.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.7%Headshot accuracy
31.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.6%Spray accuracy
71.2%Counter-strafing
11.5°Preaim
586msReaction time
29.7%T opening success
43.3%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
7.68HE damage / grenade
5.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4922 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.6918% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust216–13-0.0315%29 Aug
vertigo13–7-0.0310%23 Aug
vertigo13–40.0316%21 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0819%21 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0617%20 Aug
dust28–13-0.0718%18 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0017%17 Aug
cache13–5-0.0426%15 Aug
vertigo13–11-0.0619%3 Aug
train13–30.104%3 Aug
mirage10–13-0.130%10 Jun
overpass6–13-0.1013%5 Mar
italy13–40.0811%28 Feb
nuke11–13-0.0115%26 Feb
nuke9–130.0627%20 Feb
stronghold8–00.1043%19 Feb
vertigo13–10.0923%19 Feb
warden13–40.0228%19 Feb
vertigo2–20.010%19 Feb
nuke7–130.0410%19 Feb
vertigo13–8-0.0013%7 Feb
nuke13–10-0.0419%7 Feb
nuke13–50.0629%7 Feb
overpass13–60.0122%7 Feb
ancient13–80.0116%7 Feb
nuke16–13-0.018%7 Feb
anubis9–13-0.0716%6 Feb
dust213–10.0542%4 Feb
ancient13–6-0.0615%30 Jan
mirage2–13-0.116%26 Jan
dust210–13-0.0324%26 Jan
inferno5–13-0.0816%18 Jan
nuke13–50.0415%9 Jan
train11–13-0.078%1 Jan
inferno9–13-0.0411%20 Dec
inferno5–13-0.0214%19 Dec
nuke13–110.0322%18 Dec
nuke2–13-0.1031%8 Dec
overpass13–1-0.0111%8 Dec
inferno13–100.0111%5 Dec
nuke13–50.0234%4 Dec
train13–16-0.0118%25 Nov
nuke9–13-0.0410%19 Nov
train13–11-0.027%5 Nov
ancient8–130.0144%22 Oct
nuke13–100.0126%3 Oct
train7–13-0.0529%27 Sept
train12–16-0.0414%25 Sept
train13–11-0.025%25 Sept
train10–13-0.0628%19 Sept
overpass13–40.0421%10 Sept
dust211–12-0.0215%31 Aug
overpass13–80.0313%26 Aug
overpass13–6-0.019%25 Aug
train13–100.0124%19 Aug
overpass9–13-0.1012%15 Aug
train12–120.0318%14 Aug
vertigo13–11-0.0222%14 Aug
nuke13–4-0.085%11 Aug
brewery9–6-0.0612%2 Aug
nuke13–5-0.037%30 Jul
train12–120.0012%29 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0616%29 Jul
dust215–150.029%29 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0224%29 Jul
nuke10–30.0315%29 Jul
nuke13–6-0.087%26 Jul
nuke16–13-0.0012%22 Jul
nuke13–30.0719%18 Jul
train13–16-0.036%8 Jul
dust25–130.0025%3 Jul
train10–13-0.060%1 Jul
inferno13–90.029%25 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0418%15 Jun
dust23–13-0.0922%11 Jun
nuke10–13-0.093%9 Jun
jura12–120.0019%6 Jun
brewery9–50.0614%3 Jun
nuke16–14-0.0510%2 Jun
nuke16–13-0.048%1 Jun
train7–13-0.056%1 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0218%27 May
inferno16–19-0.0715%22 May
ancient12–16-0.069%19 May
train13–20.0313%16 May
ancient13–30.0110%16 May
ancient22–190.0112%16 May
ancient13–11-0.0314%4 May
train8–13-0.024%29 Apr
nuke13–110.009%24 Apr
vertigo13–5-0.0013%24 Apr
train13–5-0.0116%24 Apr
basalt6–13-0.1014%24 Apr
nuke13–100.0324%24 Apr
edin13–30.0217%24 Apr
ancient13–00.0522%24 Apr
train8–13-0.0317%24 Apr
overpass8–13-0.0313%24 Apr
edin13–20.0514%24 Apr
dust212–16-0.0517%20 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →