zwizu.

zwizu. — CS2 Stats

NL76561198142450351[U:1:182184623]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

2,710Tracked matches33%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Sep 2026 (31 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,160 → 2,160
+26Tracked matches · now 2,710
−3.3ppWin rate · 36.7% → 33.3%

Rating over time

2,160Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
54Days played since 2026-06-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,160
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 340 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGzwizu.PEAK ELO2,160csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning54
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42–58Last 10042%Win rateWLLLWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +2.7pp headshot accuracy · +11ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 503ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 498ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility5.4
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.4
Utility5.4
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time522ms−18ms
first ⅓ avg 541ms → last ⅓ avg 522ms
Headshot accuracy25.8%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 25.2% → last ⅓ avg 25.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–5 · nuke, 16 Jul →
55%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · dust2, 17 Jun →
344msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · inferno, 17 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 28 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
7–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 55% over 22ancientWeakest map · 0% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB2815–1354%0.02
dust2D247–1729%0.01
mirageA2212–1055%0.02
infernoD71–614%0.01
anubisB63–350%0.06
ancientD60–60%-0.04
cache—42–250%0.00
overpass—21–150%0.00
vertigo—11–0100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,649Matches
50%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
81.2ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage28348%1.0817.3
Anubis25553%1.1417.5
Ancient18648%1.0316.1
Nuke13746%1.0316.5
Inferno13052%1.0916.3
Dust212651%1.0716.8
Vertigo7047%1.0716.8
Train3551%1.0016.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.3%Headshot accuracy
36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.9%Spray accuracy
81.1%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
507msReaction time
41.9%T opening success
36.0%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
8.29HE damage / grenade
10.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 36.0336% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–11-0.0122%28 Sept →
dust210–130.0235%28 Sept →
dust25–130.1233%27 Sept →
dust27–130.0321%26 Sept →
mirage9–10.0030%24 Sept →
mirage13–100.0141%22 Sept →
inferno14–160.0629%22 Sept →
inferno10–130.0726%17 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0030%16 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0028%14 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0432%9 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0021%9 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0129%6 Sept →
dust213–20.0528%5 Sept →
mirage13–110.0318%24 Aug →
dust213–80.0837%24 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0616%23 Aug →
mirage13–110.0528%21 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0529%19 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0531%10 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0812%10 Aug →
dust213–90.0624%10 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0313%5 Aug →
mirage11–130.0328%4 Aug →
nuke13–110.1029%2 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0421%1 Aug →
dust29–130.0626%1 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0132%1 Aug →
ancient15–190.0120%30 Jul →
mirage9–130.0527%30 Jul →
dust213–90.0127%30 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0415%29 Jul →
mirage11–130.0113%28 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0427%28 Jul →
dust28–130.0622%28 Jul →
anubis13–10.1117%28 Jul →
dust24–13-0.0418%28 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0132%27 Jul →
nuke13–4-0.0526%27 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.0515%25 Jul →
nuke13–60.0828%22 Jul →
dust25–130.0839%22 Jul →
inferno11–130.0027%21 Jul →
mirage13–10.1735%21 Jul →
nuke13–7-0.0117%20 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0419%20 Jul →
nuke13–60.0341%20 Jul →
nuke13–50.0310%18 Jul →
nuke13–5-0.0017%18 Jul →
anubis10–130.0616%17 Jul →
dust213–6-0.0129%17 Jul →
nuke13–50.2239%16 Jul →
cache13–40.0127%16 Jul →
inferno14–16-0.0220%14 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0141%14 Jul →
anubis16–130.0221%14 Jul →
mirage13–70.0446%14 Jul →
inferno13–90.0738%13 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.0829%13 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.0919%11 Jul →
overpass13–90.0016%10 Jul →
vertigo13–110.0129%10 Jul →
nuke3–13-0.0331%9 Jul →
cache14–160.0145%8 Jul →
nuke13–60.0721%8 Jul →
dust213–20.0641%8 Jul →
nuke13–70.0128%7 Jul →
ancient4–13-0.0238%5 Jul →
anubis13–50.0313%4 Jul →
overpass6–130.0014%4 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0327%3 Jul →
nuke9–130.1126%3 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0223%2 Jul →
nuke11–130.0029%29 Jun →
mirage11–130.0023%29 Jun →
anubis9–130.1235%29 Jun →
dust29–130.0628%27 Jun →
mirage13–20.0926%27 Jun →
nuke9–130.0619%27 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.0327%24 Jun →
mirage16–140.0423%24 Jun →
nuke5–130.0528%23 Jun →
dust26–13-0.0233%23 Jun →
nuke9–130.0815%22 Jun →
nuke10–13-0.0322%19 Jun →
nuke13–7-0.0029%18 Jun →
cache5–13-0.030%18 Jun →
nuke13–5-0.0040%17 Jun →
dust24–13-0.0155%17 Jun →
mirage13–6-0.0234%16 Jun →
dust22–13-0.0347%16 Jun →
nuke4–130.0424%16 Jun →
dust28–13-0.058%15 Jun →
cache13–70.0224%15 Jun →
nuke13–50.0316%15 Jun →
mirage13–80.0121%14 Jun →
nuke13–50.0222%14 Jun →
mirage8–13-0.0128%13 Jun →
dust213–9-0.0012%13 Jun →
nuke13–110.0423%13 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.