AureliaRaven

AureliaRaven — CS2 Stats

AT76561198142256916[U:1:181991188]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,067Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,351Hours in CS38Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.9 LearningPositional Player
Premier CS Rating12,307Blue band · top ~42.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,287 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−354Premier CS Rating · 12,661 → 12,307
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 35 days played since 6 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,307 +3,850 7 Aug20 Sept · 33 days played
8,45712,661peak 12,6617 Aug20 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,287 +0 28 Aug31 Aug · 3 observations
1,2871,287peak 1,28728 Aug31 Aug
12,661Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,287Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-08-06

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,287
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 64 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 354 below peak (12,661)
  • +169 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 2,693 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,764), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate41.3%44.8%45.7%4.4% short
Shot accuracy11.2%12.4%12.7%1.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.081.041.05above
Match win rate46.3%45.2%45.7%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAureliaRavenFACEITLevel 6 · 1,287 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER12,307 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,287csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim28
Positioning50
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT52426Last 10052%Win rateLWWWWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +8.5pp headshot accuracy · +37ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 644ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 678ms

Last 20

  • 137 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 660ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim2.8
Utility4.9
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 60% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 52% on T to 37% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 624ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 64% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.8
Positioning5.0
Utility4.9
Mechanics3.0
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact7.2

Composite 3.9/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time611ms−55ms
first ⅓ avg 666ms → last ⅓ avg 611ms
Headshot accuracy17.7%+2.8%
first ⅓ avg 14.9% → last ⅓ avg 17.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–7 · dust2, 17 Aug
33%Best headshot accuracy · 11–5 · cache, 16 Sept
391msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · mirage, 29 Aug
13–0Biggest win · fachwerk, 3 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
105In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 62% over 13infernoWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B24121250%-0.03
mirageC1771041%-0.02
nukeA169756%-0.02
ancientA138562%-0.02
cacheA127558%-0.02
infernoC104640%-0.03
anubis31233%-0.00
fachwerk220100%-0.02
office21150%0.03
vertigo110100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

106,248Lifetime kills
1.08K/D · Top 50% of Level 6 players
5,739Matches
46.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 6 players
41.3%Headshot %
11.2%Shot accuracy
15,520MVPs
2,182Hours (in match)
4,883Bombs planted
973Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

13,920nuke
11,206dust2
5,927inferno
3,135office
1,509cbble
963train
648vertigo
266italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

249Matches
53%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
79.9ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3551%0.8714.3
Inferno3145%0.9414.7
Dust23168%1.1115.5
Ancient1958%1.0015.3
Nuke1953%1.4017.7
Anubis1553%0.9914.3
Vertigo475%0.7912.8
Train333%0.9416.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.0%Headshot accuracy
24.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.0%Spray accuracy
63.7%Counter-strafing
11.6°Preaim
624msReaction time
52.2%T opening success
36.9%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
3.2%Flash assists
4.45HE damage / grenade
13.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 36.9324% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–13-0.0425%20 Sept
ancient13–2-0.0019%18 Sept
nuke13–70.0421%17 Sept
dust213–9-0.0513%17 Sept
cache13–11-0.0118%16 Sept
mirage13–100.0218%16 Sept
mirage2–130.0126%16 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0725%16 Sept
cache11–50.0333%16 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0530%16 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0126%16 Sept
nuke2–13-0.0815%16 Sept
dust213–70.0016%16 Sept
dust213–30.0412%16 Sept
cache13–10-0.099%15 Sept
dust210–13-0.0818%15 Sept
nuke13–6-0.0220%15 Sept
nuke2–13-0.140%15 Sept
dust213–2-0.0119%15 Sept
cache13–60.0311%15 Sept
ancient13–80.0121%15 Sept
dust211–13-0.0918%15 Sept
mirage12–16-0.0522%15 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0210%15 Sept
ancient14–160.0316%14 Sept
cache4–13-0.079%14 Sept
dust213–6-0.0218%14 Sept
dust213–40.0219%14 Sept
dust28–13-0.0513%14 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0220%14 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0515%13 Sept
mirage13–80.0016%13 Sept
nuke13–110.0113%13 Sept
dust28–13-0.0221%13 Sept
nuke7–130.0011%12 Sept
dust213–8-0.0522%12 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0620%12 Sept
anubis13–80.0220%12 Sept
nuke15–15-0.0418%12 Sept
cache7–13-0.0413%11 Sept
nuke13–3-0.0124%11 Sept
cache4–13-0.0515%11 Sept
mirage8–3-0.0511%11 Sept
dust215–15-0.0115%11 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0229%11 Sept
cache13–100.0132%10 Sept
nuke13–100.0324%9 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0819%9 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0611%5 Sept
inferno13–110.0621%5 Sept
inferno6–13-0.067%5 Sept
fachwerk13–0-0.0021%3 Sept
dust215–15-0.0212%2 Sept
dust29–13-0.0014%1 Sept
dust216–12-0.0415%1 Sept
dust26–13-0.054%30 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0231%30 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0019%30 Aug
mirage9–130.0017%29 Aug
ancient13–10.0623%29 Aug
mirage6–130.0621%29 Aug
ancient13–8-0.097%29 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0810%28 Aug
inferno5–9-0.0118%27 Aug
cache9–13-0.0625%27 Aug
nuke13–50.0610%27 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0520%26 Aug
nuke6–13-0.026%25 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0216%25 Aug
dust211–13-0.0721%24 Aug
dust213–4-0.0122%21 Aug
cache13–10.0721%20 Aug
office13–40.0313%20 Aug
fachwerk13–11-0.0420%20 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0312%20 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0421%20 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0224%19 Aug
ancient13–10-0.047%19 Aug
anubis15–150.0111%18 Aug
dust213–70.1114%17 Aug
ancient13–50.0013%16 Aug
ancient13–100.0820%16 Aug
mirage13–60.0420%15 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0411%15 Aug
dust215–15-0.0210%15 Aug
cache13–70.0514%15 Aug
dust213–11-0.0413%14 Aug
dust28–13-0.0613%14 Aug
nuke13–90.016%13 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0915%13 Aug
office12–120.0211%9 Aug
vertigo13–30.0321%9 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0810%9 Aug
cache9–13-0.0617%8 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0310%8 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0411%8 Aug
mirage13–80.0021%8 Aug
dust212–16-0.069%7 Aug
ancient0–7-0.1425%6 Aug
dust213–10-0.0711%6 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →