𝖜𝖔𝖜𝖆 — CS2 Stats

76561198142066268[U:1:181800540]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,427Tracked matches48%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.3 StrongPositional Player

Premier CS Rating25,105Top 25% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#20784 of 260000 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,470 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (63 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 25,105 → 25,105

0Faceit ELO · 2,470 → 2,470

+96Tracked matches · now 3,427

0.0ppWin rate · 48.3% → 48.3%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,105 -1,827 10 May – 3 Sept · 12 days played

Faceit ELO: 2,470 +0 1 Sept – 3 Sept · 2 observations

27,453Peak Premier in tracked matches

2,470Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

53Days played since 2026-05-10

Faceit ELO

At peak — 2,470
Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 30 to go
Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
Level 10 first seen 2026-09-01
Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

2,120 below peak (27,225)
-1,660 over 90 days
Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,895 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Red band first seen 2026-09-01
Pink band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85

Positioning71

Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–49–4Last 10047%Win rateWLLWWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −3.5pp headshot accuracy · +25ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 12%
Avg reaction 488ms

Last 10

4–6 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 14%
Avg reaction 498ms

Last 20

9–11 · 45% win rate
Avg rating 0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 16%
Avg reaction 485ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.5

Utility7.0

Positioning7.1

Opening Duels5.2

Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like jL 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 42% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5

Positioning7.1

Utility7.0

Mechanics6.4

Opening Duels5.2

Win Impact4.4

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time510ms−73ms

first ⅓ avg 583ms → last ⅓ avg 510ms

Headshot accuracy15.8%−2.5%

first ⅓ avg 18.4% → last ⅓ avg 15.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–6 · cache, 13 May →

44%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · ancient, 13 Jul →

375msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · anubis, 25 Jun →

13–1Biggest win · dust2, 11 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak

9–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 60% over 10dust2Weakest map · 30% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	33	19–14	58%	0.03
cache	C	28	11–17	39%	0.04
anubis	C	10	4–6	40%	0.02
dust2	D	10	3–7	30%	0.02
ancient	A	10	6–4	60%	0.04
nuke	—	4	2–2	50%	0.01
overpass	—	3	0–3	0%	0.02
inferno	—	1	1–0	100%	0.07
poseidon	—	1	1–0	100%	0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,594Matches

52%Win rate

1.17Avg K/D

85.9ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	602	50%	1.16	17.0
Anubis	454	59%	1.24	17.1
Ancient	411	48%	1.20	16.9
Dust2	248	54%	1.13	16.5
Inferno	113	48%	1.12	16.1
Nuke	109	42%	1.03	15.2
Overpass	95	54%	1.22	18.3
Vertigo	85	52%	1.13	16.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.7%Headshot accuracy

40.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

42.4%Spray accuracy

79.0%Counter-strafing

8.5°Preaim

509msReaction time

42.4%T opening success

59.2%CT opening success

0.54Enemies flashed / flash

13.7%Flash assists

8.57HE damage / grenade

11.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–10	-0.00	17%	31 Oct →
mirage	11–13	0.00	7%	25 Oct →
mirage	12–16	-0.06	5%	18 Oct →
anubis	13–6	0.05	11%	16 Oct →
mirage	13–11	-0.08	19%	10 Oct →
anubis	8–13	-0.02	7%	2 Oct →
mirage	5–13	0.12	27%	18 Sept →
dust2	13–1	0.08	15%	11 Sept →
anubis	10–13	0.05	16%	27 Aug →
dust2	4–13	0.03	17%	25 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.01	27%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.09	17%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–7	-0.01	17%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.14	17%	14 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.01	21%	13 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.02	20%	12 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.02	19%	12 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.07	13%	12 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.00	17%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.07	10%	12 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.00	19%	11 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.04	15%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.09	11%	9 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.01	23%	7 Aug →
poseidon	9–2	0.00	18%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.12	7%	7 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.06	12%	7 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.00	10%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.08	9%	23 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.04	23%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.09	22%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.04	20%	13 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.02	15%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.04	44%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.03	36%	13 Jul →
cache	4–13	0.13	24%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.09	13%	12 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.00	20%	11 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.02	24%	11 Jul →
ancient	14–16	0.07	10%	10 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.08	19%	10 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.05	22%	9 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.08	22%	9 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.06	16%	9 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.12	26%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.01	19%	9 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.10	18%	7 Jul →
mirage	16–12	0.02	20%	6 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.02	18%	3 Jul →
mirage	13–16	-0.00	20%	2 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.05	16%	25 Jun →
nuke	16–12	0.06	12%	24 Jun →
cache	10–13	0.08	15%	24 Jun →
ancient	13–11	0.14	13%	24 Jun →
mirage	3–13	0.00	13%	24 Jun →
mirage	16–14	0.01	19%	23 Jun →
mirage	13–4	-0.01	11%	23 Jun →
dust2	16–13	0.06	15%	22 Jun →
dust2	6–13	-0.02	15%	22 Jun →
ancient	13–10	-0.05	16%	14 Jun →
ancient	13–6	0.03	18%	14 Jun →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	17%	13 Jun →
mirage	9–13	0.05	9%	13 Jun →
anubis	13–3	0.03	13%	9 Jun →
anubis	8–13	0.03	13%	7 Jun →
overpass	7–13	-0.01	12%	5 Jun →
mirage	13–11	-0.05	16%	1 Jun →
mirage	4–13	-0.03	24%	31 May →
ancient	13–8	0.00	18%	27 May →
cache	13–6	0.02	16%	27 May →
cache	13–8	0.03	23%	27 May →
anubis	8–13	0.01	14%	26 May →
cache	12–12	0.02	22%	26 May →
cache	8–13	0.01	21%	25 May →
ancient	11–13	0.05	5%	24 May →
mirage	13–9	0.13	34%	21 May →
cache	12–12	0.07	22%	17 May →
cache	13–3	0.09	19%	17 May →
dust2	9–13	0.00	18%	17 May →
anubis	10–13	0.04	12%	16 May →
mirage	13–8	-0.03	15%	16 May →
cache	5–13	-0.01	13%	16 May →
cache	13–11	-0.01	16%	16 May →
cache	7–13	0.03	17%	15 May →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	7%	15 May →
mirage	7–13	0.05	28%	15 May →
mirage	13–4	0.02	21%	15 May →
anubis	13–7	0.04	18%	14 May →
overpass	9–13	0.06	21%	14 May →
cache	10–13	0.00	16%	13 May →
cache	5–13	-0.05	9%	13 May →
overpass	7–13	0.01	23%	13 May →
anubis	13–9	0.06	21%	13 May →
cache	12–12	0.06	16%	13 May →
cache	5–13	-0.06	11%	13 May →
cache	13–6	0.20	16%	13 May →
cache	13–5	0.05	21%	13 May →
cache	2–13	-0.04	15%	11 May →
cache	13–8	0.01	38%	11 May →
ancient	13–11	0.10	17%	10 May →