colonD

colonD — CS2 Stats

FI76561198140466959[U:1:180201231]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,620Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,352 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,352 → 2,352
+2Tracked matches · now 3,620
0.0ppWin rate · 58.6% → 58.6%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 45 days played since 3 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,498 +39 22 May1 Jul · 10 days played
27,00727,937peak 27,93722 May1 Jul
Faceit ELO: 2,352 +0 31 Aug18 Sept · 2 observations
2,3522,352peak 2,35231 Aug18 Sept
28,165Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,352Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
45Days played since 2026-05-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,352
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 148 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGcolonDFACEITLevel 10 · 2,352 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,352csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning45
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48493Last 10048%Win rateLWLLWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −4.5pp headshot accuracy · −18ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 524ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 532ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility6.0
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 11.0° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 557ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning4.5
Utility6.0
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time557ms−42ms
first ⅓ avg 599ms → last ⅓ avg 557ms
Headshot accuracy27.6%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 28.4% → last ⅓ avg 27.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–3 · mirage, 22 May
53%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · mirage, 16 Jun
422msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · cache, 13 Jul
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 24 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
88In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 65% over 17anubisWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB24131154%0.03
cacheC1871139%0.02
dust2B179853%0.02
mirageS1711665%0.05
ancientA95456%0.02
anubisD5050%0.01
nukeC52340%0.01
vertigo2020%0.05
train21150%0.08
overpass1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,835Matches
51%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
74.6ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage27651%0.9815.3
Ancient20553%0.9615.4
Inferno17860%0.9814.8
Dust28446%0.9515.5
Anubis8142%0.9114.8
Nuke6554%1.0016.3
Overpass4753%1.0113.7
Vertigo2446%0.8714.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.7%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.3%Spray accuracy
82.3%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
557msReaction time
23.3%T opening success
58.5%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
5.9%Flash assists
8.17HE damage / grenade
13.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.2663% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno16–190.0129%9 Sept
dust213–70.0529%9 Sept
anubis7–130.0219%8 Sept
cache6–13-0.0328%5 Sept
dust213–70.0529%4 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0221%4 Sept
inferno13–110.0333%4 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0811%4 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0317%4 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0119%31 Aug
inferno13–110.1024%28 Aug
dust213–9-0.0326%27 Aug
ancient10–130.0829%27 Aug
inferno15–150.0223%18 Aug
mirage13–110.0414%18 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0126%18 Aug
inferno16–130.0632%8 Aug
mirage13–90.0532%8 Aug
inferno8–130.0626%6 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0846%6 Aug
dust213–90.0831%4 Aug
cache8–13-0.0829%4 Aug
ancient13–110.0522%4 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0924%4 Aug
nuke13–110.0735%3 Aug
ancient13–80.0730%3 Aug
dust28–13-0.0530%31 Jul
cache11–13-0.0717%31 Jul
mirage13–100.0241%31 Jul
cache13–100.0633%23 Jul
inferno13–50.0422%23 Jul
inferno10–130.0445%18 Jul
cache10–130.0540%18 Jul
mirage13–50.0932%14 Jul
cache0–3-0.100%14 Jul
dust213–40.0129%13 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0118%13 Jul
cache13–50.0633%13 Jul
dust213–30.0317%7 Jul
inferno13–40.0227%7 Jul
cache13–90.0720%7 Jul
dust214–160.0529%5 Jul
inferno11–130.0525%4 Jul
cache13–70.0733%4 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0217%1 Jul
overpass5–13-0.0219%1 Jul
mirage13–30.1222%1 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0029%1 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0224%1 Jul
dust28–13-0.0148%24 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0130%24 Jun
mirage13–60.1224%24 Jun
ancient13–20.0125%24 Jun
dust210–13-0.0529%24 Jun
cache3–130.1023%23 Jun
nuke16–140.0618%19 Jun
mirage13–90.0320%19 Jun
dust26–13-0.0433%19 Jun
mirage13–90.0533%18 Jun
vertigo16–190.0628%18 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0629%16 Jun
inferno15–150.0021%16 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0225%16 Jun
mirage13–20.1053%16 Jun
vertigo7–130.0330%14 Jun
inferno10–130.1221%14 Jun
cache13–30.0528%13 Jun
train13–50.0826%13 Jun
cache9–130.0526%11 Jun
inferno8–130.0122%10 Jun
dust213–80.0622%10 Jun
ancient13–80.0319%10 Jun
inferno12–120.0432%9 Jun
cache11–130.0019%9 Jun
cache13–30.0827%7 Jun
nuke8–130.0426%4 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0235%3 Jun
inferno11–130.0727%3 Jun
inferno6–130.0148%31 May
cache13–90.0428%31 May
mirage9–130.0338%28 May
ancient10–130.0230%27 May
mirage5–130.0926%27 May
anubis7–130.0618%26 May
dust27–130.0227%26 May
inferno13–10-0.0543%26 May
train7–130.0830%25 May
dust26–13-0.0439%25 May
dust22–130.0519%24 May
inferno19–170.1325%24 May
mirage2–130.0815%24 May
inferno13–90.0118%22 May
mirage13–30.1433%22 May
dust213–70.0628%22 May
cache11–130.0643%17 May
dust213–90.0441%16 May
anubis5–13-0.0024%14 May
mirage3–60.1032%14 May
cache11–13-0.0019%14 May
cache7–130.0133%3 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →