MrPedersen

MrPedersen — CS2 Stats

76561198136727034[U:1:176461306]Steam profile ↗1 game ban

1,388Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,188Hours in CS12Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 3 · 759 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 33 days played since 2 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 9,265 +962 3 May6 Jul · 18 days played
8,30310,610peak 10,6103 May6 Jul
10,967Peak Premier in tracked matches
759Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-05-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 759
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 142 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=9,584), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate42.4%41.9%42.7%meets
Shot accuracy7.3%12.2%11.3%4.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.800.980.990.20 short
Match win rate41.1%43.3%43.9%2.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMrPedersenFACEITLevel 3 · 759 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPEAK ELO759csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning49
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47521Last 10047%Win rateWLLWWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −0.9pp headshot accuracy · −37ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 522ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 537ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim5.2
Utility6.5
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 72% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 584ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning4.9
Utility6.5
Mechanics4.3
Opening Duels4.0
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time578ms−62ms
first ⅓ avg 640ms → last ⅓ avg 578ms
Headshot accuracy13.0%−3.2%
first ⅓ avg 16.2% → last ⅓ avg 13.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–11 · nuke, 6 May
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · mirage, 8 May
406msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · inferno, 8 Jul
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 7 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
78In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA28181064%0.00
infernoB27141352%-0.01
mirageD1441029%-0.02
dust2D93633%-0.01
ancientC73443%-0.03
overpassS64267%0.00
anubisD51420%-0.02
cache2020%-0.06
vertigo2020%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

36,163Lifetime kills
0.80K/D
2,777Matches
41.1%Match win rate
42.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 3 players
7.3%Shot accuracy
5,337MVPs
1,487Hours (in match)
2,197Bombs planted
558Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-478,825
AWP4,499
SSG 081,066
MP7768
Knife741

Lifetime map wins

4,940inferno
4,908nuke
3,214vertigo
1,714dust2
255train
207office
62cbble
34italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

242Matches
49%Win rate
0.74Avg K/D
65.1ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno4842%0.7612.2
Mirage4547%0.7511.5
Vertigo4159%0.8211.4
Nuke3672%0.8012.4
Ancient1844%0.6510.7
Dust21443%0.579.4
Anubis667%0.8611.3
Overpass10%0.7213.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.0%Headshot accuracy
33.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.6%Spray accuracy
69.6%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
584msReaction time
40.2%T opening success
51.6%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
14.0%Flash assists
4.94HE damage / grenade
15.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.9729% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–30.0216%21 Sept
inferno13–160.0111%21 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0021%21 Sept
inferno13–70.0811%20 Sept
mirage13–70.066%20 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0311%20 Sept
overpass13–100.0022%18 Sept
nuke13–11-0.018%18 Sept
mirage11–130.0011%18 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0010%17 Sept
nuke13–70.0520%17 Sept
nuke13–80.0311%14 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0910%14 Sept
nuke13–60.0612%14 Sept
inferno13–40.003%14 Sept
nuke5–13-0.0929%24 Jul
nuke13–4-0.0111%19 Jul
ancient13–70.0020%19 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0011%19 Jul
mirage8–13-0.088%19 Jul
dust210–13-0.086%19 Jul
cache6–13-0.084%19 Jul
inferno13–70.0620%17 Jul
dust213–50.0412%17 Jul
anubis6–13-0.036%17 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0431%17 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0413%17 Jul
nuke13–160.0512%17 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0210%15 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0314%13 Jul
dust210–13-0.0611%13 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0511%13 Jul
nuke16–12-0.0215%13 Jul
mirage11–130.0121%12 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0017%9 Jul
inferno13–6-0.025%8 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0218%7 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0719%7 Jul
vertigo5–13-0.047%7 Jul
nuke13–50.0414%6 Jul
inferno5–13-0.054%6 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0612%4 Jul
inferno8–13-0.036%4 Jul
dust26–130.0216%27 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0212%27 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0623%27 Jun
ancient5–130.0116%27 Jun
nuke13–5-0.0817%27 Jun
overpass14–16-0.0211%26 Jun
ancient13–4-0.0513%26 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0413%26 Jun
inferno3–13-0.0511%26 Jun
inferno3–9-0.0013%25 Jun
nuke3–9-0.0810%25 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0424%25 Jun
nuke13–100.0314%25 Jun
inferno16–140.0310%21 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0714%21 Jun
overpass7–130.0512%21 Jun
nuke13–110.0211%21 Jun
vertigo7–9-0.1230%21 Jun
inferno15–150.0322%11 Jun
dust24–130.0423%11 Jun
nuke6–130.0120%11 Jun
dust213–30.0010%11 Jun
anubis11–130.0217%6 Jun
nuke13–50.028%6 Jun
inferno13–7-0.040%6 Jun
overpass13–90.0728%6 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0618%30 May
overpass13–9-0.0615%30 May
inferno13–6-0.0110%30 May
dust210–13-0.0313%26 May
nuke13–80.0211%25 May
inferno13–40.0011%20 May
mirage10–13-0.0214%18 May
inferno13–80.0415%18 May
nuke13–90.0115%14 May
ancient13–80.0320%14 May
anubis13–110.0016%14 May
mirage8–13-0.0823%14 May
nuke13–70.0312%14 May
mirage14–16-0.0312%14 May
nuke16–14-0.0322%8 May
nuke10–130.0023%8 May
mirage13–60.0150%8 May
inferno6–13-0.0319%8 May
overpass13–9-0.0217%8 May
dust24–13-0.098%7 May
nuke13–10.068%7 May
mirage7–130.0113%7 May
ancient6–13-0.059%6 May
anubis6–13-0.048%6 May
inferno13–7-0.0522%6 May
nuke13–110.0925%6 May
anubis5–13-0.075%3 May
inferno13–40.0126%3 May
dust213–40.0716%3 May
cache4–13-0.0423%2 May
inferno6–13-0.069%2 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →