FredK

FredK — CS2 Stats

76561198136418721[U:1:176152993]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,247Tracked matches27%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,349Hours in CS26Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating18,766Purple band · top ~13.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#88476 of 221290 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,710 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Jul 2026 (59 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 57 days played since 8 Apr 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,766 +2,520 8 Apr20 Jul · 13 days played
16,24621,787peak 21,7878 Apr20 Jul
21,964Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,710Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
57Days played since 2025-04-08

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,710
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 41 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,021 below peak (21,787)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,234 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,738), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate48.1%46.8%48.3%meets
Shot accuracy17.2%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.131.061.07above
Match win rate47.2%46.3%46.9%meets

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 9 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFredKFACEITLevel 8 · 1,710 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER18,766 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,710csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning44
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD36586Last 10036%Win rateLWLLLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +6.5pp headshot accuracy · −43ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 35%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Last 10

  • 19 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 36%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 20

  • 2171 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility6.1
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch4.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 44 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 581ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning4.4
Utility6.1
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time596ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 613ms → last ⅓ avg 596ms
Headshot accuracy30.1%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 28.9% → last ⅓ avg 30.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 9–4 · inferno, 9 Apr
70%Best headshot accuracy · 3–9 · nuke, 24 Jul
375msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · inferno, 22 Aug
13–0Biggest win · overpass, 26 Dec

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
410In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 44% over 25nukeWeakest map · 0% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC25111444%0.01
infernoC2391439%-0.00
overpassC1771041%-0.01
cacheC73443%0.02
nukeD7070%-0.01
ancientC73443%0.01
anubisD62433%0.01
dust241325%0.02
rooftop2020%-0.02
vertigo1010%0.01
sanctum1010%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

144,015Lifetime kills
1.13K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
7,446Matches
47.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
48.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
17.2%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players
25,529MVPs
3,157Hours (in match)
7,299Bombs planted
4,291Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4745,006
AWP20,622
P2502,664
SG 5532,375
MP92,295

Lifetime map wins

12,393inferno
6,785dust2
4,819nuke
4,465train
3,430vertigo
1,585cbble
514bank
406lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,403Matches
50%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
72.3ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage18844%1.0915.2
Inferno9250%1.1014.9
Anubis8858%1.0814.9
Nuke7047%1.2616.0
Ancient5845%1.0714.8
Vertigo3754%1.2616.9
Overpass2458%1.2515.8
Cache2264%1.4019.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.4%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
46.9%Spray accuracy
81.9%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
581msReaction time
27.7%T opening success
48.2%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
12.61HE damage / grenade
17.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.6694% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage10–13-0.0537%13 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0430%12 Sept
inferno3–13-0.1232%11 Sept
mirage9–130.0440%31 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0238%22 Aug
cache14–160.0137%18 Aug
inferno7–130.0426%16 Aug
cache7–130.1024%16 Aug
vertigo8–130.0162%10 Aug
overpass3–9-0.1531%9 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0721%4 Aug
inferno14–160.0425%2 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0227%25 Jul
nuke3–9-0.0670%24 Jul
inferno9–30.0915%24 Jul
overpass1–9-0.1557%24 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0022%20 Jul
overpass8–80.0233%20 Jul
nuke0–2-0.170%19 Jul
cache19–220.0021%17 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0322%17 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0329%17 Jul
dust26–13-0.0136%16 Jul
mirage13–50.0221%16 Jul
cache13–7-0.0515%15 Jul
mirage4–130.0417%15 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0731%15 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0224%14 Jul
cache7–13-0.0125%14 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0322%14 Jul
anubis13–70.0832%14 Jul
cache13–10.0848%13 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0324%13 Jul
anubis13–50.0722%13 Jul
mirage13–60.0521%12 Jul
cache13–90.0017%10 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0213%9 Jul
inferno11–130.0033%22 Feb
dust216–140.0436%8 Feb
inferno12–16-0.0122%7 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0736%7 Feb
mirage7–13-0.0529%7 Feb
anubis14–16-0.0023%1 Feb
mirage13–10.0839%1 Feb
overpass13–70.1132%31 Jan
mirage7–130.0231%28 Jan
overpass13–40.0422%28 Jan
overpass9–20.0938%28 Jan
mirage13–70.0835%28 Jan
dust25–130.0425%28 Jan
anubis3–13-0.0335%26 Jan
inferno8–13-0.0331%25 Jan
sanctum8–80.0840%23 Jan
overpass13–4-0.0330%23 Jan
mirage13–60.0136%22 Jan
mirage13–70.0929%22 Jan
ancient9–130.0125%22 Jan
rooftop3–9-0.0515%21 Jan
inferno9–70.0718%21 Jan
inferno7–13-0.0324%18 Jan
inferno3–9-0.0633%12 Jan
overpass8–80.0036%11 Jan
ancient14–16-0.0125%11 Jan
nuke11–130.1234%11 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0120%10 Jan
inferno5–13-0.0317%10 Jan
inferno13–20.0220%9 Jan
overpass13–40.0124%9 Jan
nuke14–160.0533%9 Jan
mirage5–13-0.0429%9 Jan
dust29–13-0.0119%8 Jan
mirage9–130.0424%8 Jan
mirage8–130.0646%6 Jan
nuke15–150.0730%6 Jan
inferno13–30.0432%5 Jan
mirage13–30.0948%5 Jan
inferno9–7-0.0620%2 Jan
mirage13–11-0.0342%1 Jan
overpass5–9-0.1226%31 Dec
ancient13–80.0439%31 Dec
inferno13–100.0227%30 Dec
mirage13–3-0.0318%26 Dec
ancient13–50.0433%26 Dec
mirage13–40.1123%26 Dec
overpass13–0-0.0219%26 Dec
rooftop8–80.0133%21 Dec
inferno5–13-0.0147%19 Dec
overpass3–9-0.0318%16 Nov
overpass3–90.0263%13 Nov
overpass11–130.0116%5 Aug
overpass9–30.1614%5 Aug
inferno0–9-0.180%30 Jul
ancient13–40.0725%13 Apr
overpass5–9-0.1326%10 Apr
inferno9–40.1644%9 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0422%8 Apr
inferno9–40.0039%8 Apr
overpass8–80.0425%8 Apr
inferno13–160.0220%8 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0332%8 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →