running

running — CS2 Stats

76561198134585557[U:1:174319829]Steam profile ↗1 game ban

3,688Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating26,936Top 5% of 194,975 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6160 of 242556 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,145 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 39 days played since 8 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,936 -463 8 Aug – 23 Sept · 39 days played
25,86827,848peak 27,8488 Aug23 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,145 +0 31 Aug – 16 Sept · 3 observations
2,1452,145peak 2,14531 Aug16 Sept
28,073Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,145Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-08-08

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,145
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 355 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 912 below peak (27,848)
  • +661 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,064 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGrunningFACEITLevel 10 · 2,145 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER26,936 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,145csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning61
Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–50–2Last 10048%Win rateLLLWWWLTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.2pp headshot accuracy · +64ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 495ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 507ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 475ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility7.1
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch4.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning6.1
Utility7.1
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact2.1

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time499ms−65ms
first ⅓ avg 563ms → last ⅓ avg 499ms
Headshot accuracy21.9%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 21.7% → last ⅓ avg 21.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–4 · nuke, 5 Sept →
46%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · inferno, 15 Aug →
375msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · inferno, 29 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 22 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
12–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 18anubisWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB2614–1254%0.03
infernoC2511–1444%0.01
nukeS1812–667%0.03
cacheB136–746%0.03
anubisD93–633%0.00
mirageD62–433%-0.01
dust2—20–20%0.01
train—10–10%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,446Matches
53%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
85.0ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke30058%1.3318.0
Ancient29254%1.2218.0
Inferno23057%1.2117.8
Mirage18044%1.1217.4
Dust213548%1.0616.7
Anubis13042%1.1317.2
Overpass6265%1.2817.2
Train5256%1.1816.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.2%Headshot accuracy
36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.4%Spray accuracy
78.6%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
494msReaction time
30.4%T opening success
52.4%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
12.5%Flash assists
6.82HE damage / grenade
17.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.4% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient9–13-0.0018%23 Sept →
mirage11–130.0216%23 Sept →
inferno0–13-0.1029%23 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0116%23 Sept →
nuke13–90.1132%23 Sept →
inferno13–10.0915%22 Sept →
nuke6–130.0111%22 Sept →
ancient15–150.0418%22 Sept →
cache13–80.0830%22 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0028%21 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0014%21 Sept →
ancient13–20.0617%17 Sept →
train0–13-0.060%16 Sept →
inferno13–90.0416%16 Sept →
nuke13–80.0533%16 Sept →
ancient13–110.0926%16 Sept →
inferno9–130.0229%15 Sept →
ancient13–40.1225%15 Sept →
anubis16–120.0525%14 Sept →
cache13–16-0.0025%13 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0830%13 Sept →
inferno13–80.0124%13 Sept →
inferno13–100.0427%12 Sept →
anubis11–130.0017%12 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0326%11 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0215%11 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0420%10 Sept →
ancient12–16-0.0313%10 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0634%10 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0443%8 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0114%8 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0221%8 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0421%7 Sept →
cache14–160.0524%7 Sept →
inferno13–50.1426%7 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0219%6 Sept →
ancient13–110.0625%6 Sept →
ancient13–50.1219%5 Sept →
nuke13–40.1725%5 Sept →
nuke13–16-0.0028%5 Sept →
inferno13–90.1038%5 Sept →
cache16–120.0118%4 Sept →
dust214–160.0427%4 Sept →
nuke13–100.0521%3 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0429%3 Sept →
ancient12–70.0529%2 Sept →
mirage13–70.0232%2 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0031%2 Sept →
nuke13–90.0525%1 Sept →
ancient6–130.0420%1 Sept →
inferno13–100.0019%1 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0526%1 Sept →
nuke13–80.0321%31 Aug →
anubis16–140.0317%31 Aug →
ancient7–130.0221%31 Aug →
inferno13–5-0.0418%29 Aug →
anubis9–130.0119%29 Aug →
ancient13–70.0618%29 Aug →
inferno3–130.0129%29 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0119%27 Aug →
ancient6–130.0012%27 Aug →
inferno13–60.0535%26 Aug →
cache10–130.1533%25 Aug →
inferno3–130.0618%25 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0316%24 Aug →
anubis13–70.0119%24 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.0223%24 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0223%21 Aug →
cache13–50.0422%20 Aug →
nuke13–70.0512%20 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0422%20 Aug →
cache16–140.0413%19 Aug →
inferno10–130.0222%19 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0421%18 Aug →
inferno8–130.0331%18 Aug →
anubis7–130.0317%18 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0012%18 Aug →
anubis2–13-0.0215%17 Aug →
nuke13–110.1127%17 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0217%17 Aug →
ancient13–70.1027%16 Aug →
nuke7–130.0424%16 Aug →
ancient15–150.0213%15 Aug →
inferno2–13-0.0346%15 Aug →
ancient13–60.0919%15 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0631%14 Aug →
nuke13–110.0325%14 Aug →
ancient13–90.0723%13 Aug →
inferno12–16-0.0119%13 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0223%12 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0618%12 Aug →
cache16–13-0.0016%11 Aug →
inferno16–140.0416%11 Aug →
inferno13–40.0319%10 Aug →
cache13–110.0128%10 Aug →
mirage5–130.0535%10 Aug →
cache8–130.0318%9 Aug →
cache8–130.0225%9 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0518%9 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0318%8 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →