YEKINDAR — CS2 Stats

76561198134401925[U:1:174136197]✓ No bans

2,865Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidHybrid Rifler
CSDB Leaderboard#5272 of 6789 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

3,977Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,977
  • Next: 4,000 ELO at 4,000 23 to go
  • Reached: 3,500 ELO · 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10
  • 3,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGYEKINDARPEAK ELO3,977csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning49
Utility77

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5446Last 10054%Win rateWWLLLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.6
Aggression5.8
Utility7.7
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Utility. Utility score of 77 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning4.9
Utility7.7
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time501ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 512ms → last ⅓ avg 501ms
Headshot accuracy26.1%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 25.6% → last ⅓ avg 26.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — overpass 13–4
132Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
611In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 80% over 10anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC28121643%0.01
dust2B21111052%0.02
nukeB158753%-0.01
overpassS108280%0.00
infernoS96367%0.01
ancientS86275%0.01
anubisD72529%-0.01
cache21150%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,990Matches
62%Win rate
1.32Avg K/D
91.8ADR
58%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
17Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage34961%1.3318.1
Anubis19164%1.2817.7
Dust217461%1.4018.9
Ancient15068%1.3617.7
Nuke9560%1.3517.6
Inferno5467%1.2918.1
Overpass4252%1.3617.7
Train3057%1.3219.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.3%Headshot accuracy
36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.4%Spray accuracy
79.3%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
501msReaction time
29.4%T opening success
54.4%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
10.5%Flash assists
8.42HE damage / grenade
15.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.3869% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–60.0830%26 Aug
mirage13–2-0.0126%26 Aug
mirage0–13-0.0917%25 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0324%23 Aug
dust29–13-0.0125%23 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0241%23 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0020%22 Aug
dust213–16-0.0319%22 Aug
nuke13–60.0635%22 Aug
ancient13–30.0823%20 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0222%20 Aug
dust213–40.0329%20 Aug
nuke14–16-0.0419%19 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0636%19 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0216%19 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0215%15 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0420%15 Aug
dust213–60.0557%15 Aug
inferno13–100.0125%12 Aug
anubis0–20.0530%24 Jul
cache14–16-0.0332%24 Jul
mirage13–60.0439%24 Jul
anubis6–11-0.0223%24 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0125%21 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0322%21 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0620%21 Jun
nuke13–40.0428%20 Jun
dust213–90.0029%20 Jun
mirage2–50.0915%18 Jun
dust28–13-0.0431%18 Jun
mirage11–40.0915%18 Jun
overpass13–6-0.0121%18 Jun
overpass13–60.0233%13 Jun
dust213–60.0825%13 Jun
overpass13–7-0.0131%12 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0815%12 Jun
nuke9–50.1026%12 Jun
mirage13–100.0429%11 Jun
inferno13–40.0127%11 Jun
dust217–190.0022%15 May
mirage13–90.0222%15 May
nuke20–22-0.0416%15 May
nuke13–11-0.0024%12 May
overpass10–13-0.0333%12 May
dust28–13-0.0617%11 May
mirage11–130.0027%11 May
overpass16–12-0.0325%11 May
inferno13–70.0435%10 May
mirage13–40.0522%10 May
overpass13–30.0434%9 May
nuke13–30.0425%9 May
dust24–130.0113%30 Apr
nuke3–13-0.0241%30 Apr
mirage13–70.0126%30 Apr
nuke5–13-0.0524%30 Apr
inferno13–5-0.0426%30 Apr
mirage10–130.0220%30 Apr
ancient13–60.0340%26 Apr
dust213–40.0427%26 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0413%19 Apr
dust211–13-0.0234%19 Apr
ancient10–130.0012%18 Apr
overpass7–50.0115%18 Apr
overpass3–8-0.0715%18 Apr
dust213–90.0126%15 Apr
mirage13–50.0121%15 Apr
dust213–40.0425%14 Apr
nuke16–13-0.0024%14 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0415%14 Apr
mirage13–70.0319%13 Apr
inferno13–30.1117%13 Apr
inferno13–80.1027%9 Apr
dust216–130.0337%23 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0416%23 Mar
nuke10–13-0.0333%23 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0140%22 Mar
dust213–70.0727%22 Mar
nuke13–2-0.0514%22 Mar
dust214–16-0.0420%20 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0225%20 Mar
anubis13–110.0121%20 Mar
dust29–130.0423%19 Mar
overpass13–11-0.0420%18 Mar
mirage13–80.0034%18 Mar
mirage7–130.0519%18 Mar
mirage5–130.0433%18 Mar
overpass13–40.1528%17 Mar
mirage6–130.0033%17 Mar
mirage13–60.0424%17 Mar
ancient13–80.0120%16 Mar
ancient13–40.0338%16 Mar
nuke2–13-0.0619%16 Mar
anubis16–140.0236%16 Mar
dust28–13-0.0426%16 Mar
mirage19–220.0325%15 Mar
dust213–50.1433%15 Mar
anubis7–13-0.0913%15 Mar
mirage7–130.0640%15 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0210%14 Mar
dust213–60.0736%14 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

3K ELO Club1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →