Captain Khat Sparrow — CS2 Stats

76561198132407593[U:1:172141865]

1,801Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating9,627Light Blue band · top ~56.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#25363 of 34649 tracked
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCaptain Khat SparrowFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER9,627 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning52
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY4357Last 10043%Win rateWLLWWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.3
Aggression6.2
Utility5.6
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch3.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 620ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning5.2
Utility5.6
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time616ms−90ms
first ⅓ avg 706ms → last ⅓ avg 616ms
Headshot accuracy14.9%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 14.5% → last ⅓ avg 14.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — ancient 13–6
131Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
59In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 63% over 16anubisWeakest map · 27% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC1981142%0.02
nukeA1610663%0.03
anubisD1541127%-0.00
ancientB147750%0.02
dust2C145936%-0.00
mirageC145936%-0.03
overpass41325%-0.03
cache330100%0.06
vertigo1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

111Matches
44%Win rate
0.88Avg K/D
70.9ADR
29%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1958%0.7810.7
Nuke1443%0.8913.6
Anubis1233%0.8111.5
Ancient714%0.7712.1
Dust2540%0.7612.4
Mirage450%0.8714.0
Train425%0.8812.8
Overpass2100%1.2212.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.3%Headshot accuracy
36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.1%Spray accuracy
83.1%Counter-strafing
12.1°Preaim
620msReaction time
36.9%T opening success
42.7%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
8.7%Flash assists
8.37HE damage / grenade
3.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.0535° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.0872 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–110.0921%29 Aug
ancient13–160.0514%29 Aug
anubis10–130.0423%29 Aug
inferno13–90.0015%29 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0021%29 Aug
inferno9–130.0120%29 Aug
anubis13–8-0.015%28 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0614%28 Aug
nuke13–90.0512%28 Aug
dust27–130.0217%28 Aug
inferno13–20.0524%28 Aug
ancient13–10.075%28 Aug
anubis6–130.0611%28 Aug
inferno13–50.0414%28 Aug
ancient13–60.0614%28 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0721%28 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0013%27 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0513%27 Aug
inferno13–70.0412%27 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0318%27 Aug
inferno13–70.0215%27 Aug
nuke13–60.0616%27 Aug
cache13–100.0912%27 Aug
dust213–160.0117%27 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0113%27 Aug
dust27–13-0.0512%27 Aug
anubis13–20.0424%27 Aug
anubis14–16-0.0116%26 Aug
cache13–100.058%26 Aug
mirage13–40.0222%26 Aug
inferno9–13-0.008%26 Aug
ancient13–80.0113%26 Aug
mirage4–13-0.1110%26 Aug
nuke13–30.0424%26 Aug
anubis13–10.0612%26 Aug
cache13–80.056%26 Aug
dust213–20.0312%26 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0113%26 Aug
mirage6–130.0221%26 Aug
dust28–13-0.0318%26 Aug
ancient9–13-0.059%25 Aug
ancient13–70.1011%25 Aug
anubis10–13-0.056%25 Aug
ancient6–13-0.1124%25 Aug
dust216–14-0.0111%25 Aug
inferno13–50.1418%25 Aug
anubis11–13-0.069%24 Aug
mirage13–90.019%24 Aug
inferno3–13-0.094%24 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0215%23 Aug
ancient13–40.0712%23 Aug
nuke13–80.0718%23 Aug
dust213–16-0.0417%23 Aug
mirage11–130.0413%23 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0723%23 Aug
nuke13–40.0512%23 Aug
ancient4–130.0114%23 Aug
nuke10–130.0118%22 Aug
dust213–70.0613%22 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0614%21 Aug
dust213–90.036%21 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0512%21 Aug
ancient13–50.0123%21 Aug
inferno6–90.0717%21 Aug
ancient11–130.0114%21 Aug
nuke13–100.0312%21 Aug
dust28–130.0223%21 Aug
nuke4–13-0.052%20 Aug
anubis13–11-0.046%20 Aug
ancient13–60.2415%20 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0614%20 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0321%20 Aug
dust211–13-0.0012%20 Aug
mirage13–11-0.035%20 Aug
anubis10–130.0415%20 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0420%16 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0613%15 Jun
overpass13–2-0.037%15 Jun
nuke13–20.1022%15 Jun
mirage6–13-0.039%15 Jun
inferno16–130.0315%14 Jun
overpass1–13-0.0416%14 Jun
overpass14–160.0214%13 Jun
anubis11–13-0.039%13 Jun
dust213–20.0115%13 Jun
dust24–13-0.0416%13 Jun
nuke13–80.0711%13 Jun
mirage13–90.069%13 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0815%11 Jun
nuke6–130.0422%11 Jun
inferno3–13-0.0419%11 Jun
anubis1–80.0330%11 Jun
vertigo6–130.0119%11 Jun
dust27–13-0.059%11 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0423%11 Jun
overpass2–13-0.0513%11 Jun
nuke7–130.0413%11 Jun
anubis4–130.0315%11 Jun
inferno11–130.0518%11 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0517%11 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →