Storken (CM)

Storken (CM) — CS2 Stats

DK76561198131784030[U:1:171518302]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

623Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.8 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,898Top 50% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#58399 of 261537 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,829 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Oct 2026 (17 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,898 -446 11 Mar – 28 Oct · 14 days played
19,54622,421peak 22,42111 Mar28 Oct
22,545Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,829Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-03-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,829
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 172 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-23
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-23

Premier CS Rating

  • 523 below peak (22,421)
  • -523 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,102 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-23
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-23

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGStorken (CM)FACEITLevel 9 · 1,829 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER21,898 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,829csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning75
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–43–10Last 10047%Win rateLLWLWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +7.9pp headshot accuracy · −1ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 554ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility6.0
Positioning7.5
Opening Duels6.3
Clutch1.8

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 69% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning7.5
Utility6.0
Mechanics8.6
Opening Duels8.3
Win Impact6.2

Composite 7.8/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time539ms−69ms
first ⅓ avg 608ms → last ⅓ avg 539ms
Headshot accuracy21.6%−2.0%
first ⅓ avg 23.5% → last ⅓ avg 21.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.26Best match rating · 9–3 · vertigo, 3 Jun →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 2–9 · vertigo, 28 Jun →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · ancient, 3 Oct →
13–3Biggest win · mirage, 10 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
5–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 83% over 6overpassWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB168–850%0.03
infernoA159–660%0.07
ancientB147–750%0.04
nukeD134–931%0.01
cacheC104–640%0.04
vertigoA106–460%0.08
dust2D72–529%0.02
anubisS65–183%0.04
overpassD51–420%0.01
poseidon—21–150%-0.06
shelter—10–10%0.04
sanctum—10–10%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

450Matches
53%Win rate
1.26Avg K/D
74.8ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient3551%0.9514.7
Nuke1753%0.9815.2
Anubis1250%1.1015.9
Inferno1030%0.8612.7
Mirage743%1.2014.4
Overpass650%1.2015.3
Train560%1.0614.8
Dust2333%1.0316.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.5%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.7%Spray accuracy
88.7%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
539msReaction time
69.2%T opening success
57.6%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
8.6%Flash assists
11.28HE damage / grenade
10.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4696 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategy →Overpass grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke9–13-0.0424%28 Oct →
cache10–130.0035%28 Oct →
ancient13–90.1626%28 Oct →
dust28–130.0135%28 Oct →
ancient13–60.0033%10 Oct →
dust213–70.0425%10 Oct →
nuke13–80.0315%10 Oct →
ancient8–130.1114%10 Oct →
mirage16–130.0327%10 Oct →
mirage13–30.0829%10 Oct →
ancient13–90.0515%10 Oct →
cache11–130.0322%7 Oct →
ancient3–130.0523%7 Oct →
mirage13–50.0820%7 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0310%7 Oct →
cache13–70.1417%4 Oct →
ancient7–130.0212%4 Oct →
mirage9–130.0724%4 Oct →
anubis13–90.0617%4 Oct →
mirage16–130.0622%3 Oct →
ancient13–40.0715%3 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0616%3 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0131%3 Oct →
anubis13–40.0616%3 Oct →
shelter12–120.0421%1 Oct →
mirage9–130.0115%1 Oct →
overpass2–130.0220%1 Oct →
cache16–120.0111%26 Sept →
cache8–130.0222%26 Sept →
vertigo6–9-0.0439%26 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.0030%23 Sept →
anubis13–110.0115%23 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0714%23 Sept →
dust213–40.0636%23 Sept →
dust211–130.0413%23 Sept →
nuke4–130.0420%23 Sept →
inferno8–80.0017%23 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0319%23 Sept →
anubis13–50.0721%2 Jul →
nuke5–130.0220%2 Jul →
mirage16–13-0.0538%2 Jul →
cache12–120.1230%2 Jul →
anubis6–130.1123%2 Jul →
nuke13–60.2235%1 Jul →
vertigo4–90.0042%1 Jul →
nuke8–8-0.1114%28 Jun →
inferno5–90.0420%28 Jun →
vertigo2–9-0.0150%28 Jun →
dust27–130.0123%22 Jun →
mirage8–13-0.0317%22 Jun →
ancient13–90.0627%22 Jun →
inferno9–5-0.0218%22 Jun →
inferno9–40.1524%22 Jun →
ancient12–120.0414%16 Jun →
cache5–130.0124%16 Jun →
poseidon6–9-0.0933%16 Jun →
vertigo4–9-0.1120%10 Jun →
mirage13–70.0318%10 Jun →
nuke8–8-0.0330%10 Jun →
vertigo9–30.1118%10 Jun →
ancient13–6-0.009%4 Jun →
inferno3–9-0.0915%4 Jun →
vertigo9–30.2630%3 Jun →
nuke7–90.1125%3 Jun →
inferno9–60.0527%3 Jun →
overpass8–80.0114%1 Jun →
vertigo9–70.1321%1 Jun →
nuke6–9-0.1146%1 Jun →
inferno9–50.1121%1 Jun →
cache13–70.0119%31 May →
inferno9–50.0727%31 May →
mirage15–150.0220%28 May →
inferno4–9-0.0418%26 May →
vertigo9–20.1511%26 May →
overpass5–9-0.1115%25 May →
nuke9–70.0818%22 May →
inferno9–50.0821%22 May →
vertigo9–30.0926%22 May →
vertigo9–50.1822%7 May →
inferno9–30.2226%7 May →
inferno9–50.1623%7 May →
nuke2–9-0.168%7 May →
sanctum7–90.1014%6 May →
cache13–60.0821%30 Apr →
cache6–13-0.0228%30 Apr →
mirage13–60.1725%18 Apr →
ancient7–130.0024%13 Apr →
dust24–130.0030%18 Mar →
inferno7–130.0621%18 Mar →
overpass13–50.037%17 Mar →
overpass7–130.0922%17 Mar →
inferno8–80.0039%17 Mar →
mirage5–13-0.0135%16 Mar →
inferno9–40.1929%16 Mar →
poseidon9–7-0.0338%16 Mar →
mirage5–13-0.0831%15 Mar →
nuke9–130.0422%15 Mar →
mirage4–130.0221%15 Mar →
mirage13–50.0628%11 Mar →
ancient13–80.0420%11 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.