I'm trash

I'm trash — CS2 Stats

76561198131708116[U:1:171442388]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

360Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,795Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (20 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+2Tracked matches · now 360
−3.6ppWin rate · 53.6% → 50.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 36 days played since 13 Aug 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,450 -549 22 May6 Jul · 18 days played
13,05415,108peak 15,10822 May6 Jul
15,501Peak Premier in tracked matches
36Days played since 2025-08-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches2
Win rate0%
K/D0.97
Headshot %50%

Measured 29 Aug 202623 Sep 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=9,584), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate35.3%41.9%42.7%7.4% short
Shot accuracy15.3%12.2%11.3%above
Kill/death ratio1.070.980.99above
Match win rate45.9%43.3%43.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGI'm trashFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning56
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41527Last 10041%Win rateLLWLWWWTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.2pp headshot accuracy · +57ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 634ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 650ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility6.1
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.1

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 592ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning5.6
Utility6.1
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time606ms−6ms
first ⅓ avg 613ms → last ⅓ avg 606ms
Headshot accuracy13.2%−5.7%
first ⅓ avg 18.9% → last ⅓ avg 13.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–2 · ancient, 15 Jun
38%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · dust2, 13 May
406msFastest reaction time · 13–16 · dust2, 17 Jun
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 16 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
67In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 55% over 29infernoWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A29161355%0.01
mirageC28121643%-0.00
ancientD1651131%0.02
anubisC94544%-0.01
infernoD71614%-0.03
cacheD62433%-0.01
poseidon2020%0.09
office21150%0.02
overpass1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

51,663Lifetime kills
1.07K/D · Top 50% of Level 3 players
3,046Matches
45.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 3 players
35.3%Headshot %
15.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 3 players
7,042MVPs
1,067Hours (in match)
1,635Bombs planted
539Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4717,784
AWP2,909
P901,402
MP91,240

Lifetime map wins

7,718dust2
2,432inferno
945vertigo
776office
441nuke
391train
221lake
205cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

47Matches
45%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
ADR
29%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.3%Headshot accuracy
37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.6%Spray accuracy
84.7%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
592msReaction time
30.8%T opening success
50.9%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
12.4%Flash assists
12.21HE damage / grenade
9.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.2931% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.771% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache7–13-0.028%23 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0322%18 Sept
mirage13–110.005%21 Jul
dust211–130.0110%21 Jul
anubis13–10.029%16 Jul
mirage13–70.0115%16 Jul
dust213–90.0716%16 Jul
dust215–150.0114%11 Jul
anubis13–50.0121%11 Jul
cache5–13-0.037%10 Jul
dust213–9-0.0013%6 Jul
inferno5–13-0.045%6 Jul
inferno13–160.0014%4 Jul
mirage10–130.038%4 Jul
ancient13–70.1121%4 Jul
dust213–10.0411%3 Jul
ancient5–13-0.016%3 Jul
mirage13–80.0819%1 Jul
dust213–100.0018%1 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0510%1 Jul
mirage13–10.0114%1 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0216%29 Jun
ancient12–16-0.0119%29 Jun
anubis9–130.0318%29 Jun
dust213–6-0.0213%25 Jun
ancient7–130.0416%17 Jun
dust213–16-0.008%17 Jun
anubis13–8-0.0113%17 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0117%17 Jun
ancient5–13-0.117%15 Jun
dust213–30.0320%15 Jun
dust211–13-0.0310%15 Jun
mirage13–100.0512%15 Jun
ancient8–130.027%15 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0414%15 Jun
dust213–90.0314%15 Jun
ancient13–20.1517%15 Jun
mirage13–80.0613%15 Jun
anubis9–130.0217%14 Jun
inferno13–160.0127%14 Jun
dust29–13-0.0313%14 Jun
anubis13–10-0.0013%12 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0514%12 Jun
dust210–13-0.0222%12 Jun
anubis6–11-0.057%9 Jun
mirage15–150.009%9 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0215%9 Jun
mirage14–160.0121%9 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0318%8 Jun
dust26–13-0.0711%8 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0312%8 Jun
ancient13–110.0411%8 Jun
dust213–100.0420%8 Jun
dust216–14-0.066%4 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0912%4 Jun
poseidon8–80.1321%29 May
poseidon8–80.0510%29 May
ancient10–130.0821%27 May
dust213–80.0314%27 May
mirage8–13-0.0412%27 May
mirage9–130.0412%26 May
mirage13–60.0310%26 May
overpass7–130.0115%26 May
inferno13–100.0810%25 May
dust28–130.0130%25 May
dust27–130.0222%24 May
mirage16–130.0718%22 May
mirage13–50.0113%22 May
dust213–6-0.0121%22 May
dust213–7-0.0117%22 May
mirage1–13-0.0511%22 May
anubis9–13-0.0416%22 May
mirage13–70.0529%17 May
inferno5–13-0.0415%17 May
mirage8–13-0.0414%17 May
dust213–20.1522%14 May
mirage8–13-0.0016%14 May
dust29–130.0238%13 May
mirage6–13-0.0815%13 May
ancient13–80.0221%13 May
ancient13–110.0613%12 May
anubis5–13-0.025%12 May
dust213–40.0720%10 May
mirage13–60.0326%10 May
dust215–15-0.0314%10 May
dust213–90.0828%10 May
ancient15–150.039%10 May
ancient9–130.0125%9 May
cache8–00.0120%9 May
cache8–13-0.0121%9 May
dust214–16-0.0417%7 May
mirage10–13-0.0310%7 May
cache8–13-0.0321%7 May
cache13–110.0220%7 May
office8–13-0.0711%21 Oct
mirage2–13-0.0618%21 Oct
dust211–130.0220%21 Oct
dust213–110.0125%22 Sept
inferno5–9-0.1730%22 Aug
office13–40.1125%13 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →