sfgbv

sfgbv — CS2 Stats

NO76561198131558802[U:1:171293074]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

807Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,928Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#46690 of 245686 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,619 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 46 days played since 2 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,546 +2,546 3 Jan – 14 Mar · 30 days played
20,00022,961peak 22,9613 Jan14 Mar
22,961Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,619Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
46Days played since 2026-01-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,619
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 132 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,590), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate48.7%46.8%48.2%meets
Shot accuracy16.4%13.0%13.3%above
Kill/death ratio0.961.061.070.11 short
Match win rate43.0%46.3%46.9%4.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsfgbvFACEITLevel 8 · 1,619 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,619csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim41
Positioning56
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42–55–3Last 10042%Win rateLLLLLWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +3.4pp headshot accuracy · −57ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 614ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim4.1
Utility6.9
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch3.6

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 60% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.77 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 620ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.1
Positioning5.6
Utility6.9
Mechanics3.9
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact2.8

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time619ms−29ms
first ⅓ avg 647ms → last ⅓ avg 619ms
Headshot accuracy22.5%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 20.8% → last ⅓ avg 22.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 9–13 · dust2, 11 Feb →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · overpass, 21 Feb →
453msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · inferno, 5 Sept →
13–3Biggest win · mirage, 24 Jan →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L5Current streak
9–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 6infernoWeakest map · 25% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC3313–2039%0.01
infernoD205–1525%0.00
dust2C198–1142%0.01
overpassA117–464%0.02
nukeC83–538%-0.00
anubisS64–267%0.02
ancient—32–167%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

196,307Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
7,685Matches
43.0%Match win rate
48.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
16.4%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players
17,229MVPs
4,928Hours (in match)
8,700Bombs planted
2,025Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4774,087
AWP20,607
P25010,337
Knife3,383
SSG 082,589
Tec-92,553

Lifetime map wins

13,552inferno
9,575dust2
3,707train
3,585nuke
2,946cbble
930vertigo
59safehouse
46office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,950Matches
50%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
72.3ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2446%0.9916.0
Ancient1833%0.9614.7
Dust21850%0.9412.2
Inferno1771%1.0114.7
Nuke650%1.0415.2
Overpass50%0.8615.4
Anubis333%0.7113.7
Train367%1.0117.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.6%Headshot accuracy
27.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
27.9%Spray accuracy
67.6%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
620msReaction time
33.4%T opening success
45.7%CT opening success
0.77Enemies flashed / flash
8.7%Flash assists
13.96HE damage / grenade
8.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.3798% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno11–13-0.0622%5 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0135%19 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0331%17 Jul →
dust213–16-0.0518%2 May →
mirage6–130.0513%14 Mar →
dust213–80.0321%14 Mar →
overpass16–130.0018%11 Mar →
dust29–130.0140%11 Mar →
inferno7–13-0.0522%10 Mar →
inferno13–60.0221%10 Mar →
mirage10–130.0027%9 Mar →
dust27–130.0221%7 Mar →
dust213–11-0.0812%6 Mar →
mirage13–80.0417%5 Mar →
nuke14–16-0.0217%4 Mar →
mirage16–130.0620%4 Mar →
mirage5–13-0.0524%3 Mar →
overpass13–110.0320%2 Mar →
mirage9–13-0.0429%2 Mar →
overpass13–100.0418%28 Feb →
nuke5–13-0.0320%28 Feb →
inferno10–13-0.0125%28 Feb →
inferno10–13-0.0419%27 Feb →
mirage5–13-0.0820%25 Feb →
inferno5–130.0019%23 Feb →
inferno13–40.0611%21 Feb →
dust213–10-0.0121%21 Feb →
inferno13–110.0716%21 Feb →
dust213–100.0628%21 Feb →
mirage13–90.0220%21 Feb →
mirage6–130.0532%21 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.0226%21 Feb →
overpass9–13-0.0341%21 Feb →
mirage13–100.0420%19 Feb →
ancient7–13-0.066%19 Feb →
inferno13–16-0.0311%18 Feb →
dust216–140.0322%18 Feb →
mirage15–150.0512%18 Feb →
dust215–150.0137%17 Feb →
inferno8–130.0321%17 Feb →
ancient13–6-0.0614%16 Feb →
anubis13–110.0317%16 Feb →
dust23–13-0.0619%12 Feb →
inferno11–13-0.0415%12 Feb →
mirage9–13-0.0317%12 Feb →
mirage9–130.0020%11 Feb →
mirage13–110.0328%11 Feb →
anubis6–130.0119%11 Feb →
nuke13–100.0416%11 Feb →
dust29–130.0927%11 Feb →
inferno8–130.0320%10 Feb →
overpass13–80.0122%10 Feb →
dust26–13-0.0118%10 Feb →
mirage11–130.0423%10 Feb →
dust211–13-0.0131%9 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.093%9 Feb →
anubis13–11-0.0119%9 Feb →
nuke7–13-0.0424%8 Feb →
dust23–13-0.0112%7 Feb →
overpass6–130.0621%7 Feb →
inferno4–130.0132%7 Feb →
anubis8–13-0.0124%2 Feb →
nuke5–13-0.0021%31 Jan →
mirage8–130.009%31 Jan →
mirage13–100.0411%31 Jan →
inferno13–80.0028%31 Jan →
inferno8–13-0.0117%30 Jan →
dust211–13-0.0113%30 Jan →
mirage15–150.0120%30 Jan →
anubis13–80.0423%29 Jan →
inferno10–130.0732%29 Jan →
nuke16–140.0524%25 Jan →
mirage13–60.0425%25 Jan →
overpass13–90.0316%24 Jan →
mirage10–13-0.0018%24 Jan →
anubis13–70.0519%24 Jan →
mirage13–30.0216%24 Jan →
dust213–60.0730%17 Jan →
mirage16–130.0131%17 Jan →
inferno11–13-0.0014%16 Jan →
dust22–13-0.0727%16 Jan →
nuke13–160.0118%16 Jan →
mirage7–130.0414%16 Jan →
nuke13–110.0018%16 Jan →
mirage10–130.0534%15 Jan →
overpass4–130.0122%15 Jan →
inferno8–13-0.0314%11 Jan →
overpass13–5-0.0031%11 Jan →
dust213–30.0613%11 Jan →
mirage13–60.0415%10 Jan →
mirage13–80.0123%10 Jan →
inferno10–13-0.0016%9 Jan →
mirage14–16-0.0117%8 Jan →
overpass13–90.0725%8 Jan →
mirage13–10-0.0221%7 Jan →
dust213–70.0621%4 Jan →
mirage13–80.0513%4 Jan →
overpass9–130.0515%3 Jan →
inferno13–100.0532%3 Jan →
ancient13–10-0.0217%2 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →