fREQ

fREQ — CS2 Stats

PROBounty HuntersBrazilRiflerSettings & gear profile →

BR76561198130114333[U:1:169848605]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,617Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating26,536Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1015 of 12503 tracked
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGfREQFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER26,536 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning50
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58402Last 10058%Win rateWWLLWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.0
Aggression4.4
Utility6.4
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning5.0
Utility6.4
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time513ms−12ms
first ⅓ avg 525ms → last ⅓ avg 513ms
Headshot accuracy24.2%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 24.9% → last ⅓ avg 24.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — dust2 13–2
131Biggest win — ancient
8Longest win streak
W2Current streak
85In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 77% over 22anubisWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA22121055%0.00
nukeS2217577%0.00
dust2S2014670%0.03
ancientB189950%-0.02
anubisC83538%-0.01
cacheC73443%0.01
overpass2020%0.01
train1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,293Matches
63%Win rate
1.29Avg K/D
76.2ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
16Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15768%1.2716.4
Ancient10765%1.3516.1
Nuke8170%1.3615.3
Anubis7469%1.2615.8
Dust24757%1.3215.5
Vertigo2162%1.1816.5
Inferno1958%1.2414.9
Overpass1164%1.7313.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Inventory

$899Inventory value21ItemsFull inventory breakdown →
★ Sport Gloves | Amphibious (Well-Worn)$410M4A1-S | Mecha Industries (Field-Tested)$166USP-S | Printstream (Field-Tested)$57AK-47 | Inheritance (Field-Tested)$55Desert Eagle | Printstream (Field-Tested)$52M4A4 | Temukau (Field-Tested)$48

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.8%Headshot accuracy
37.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.3%Spray accuracy
83.4%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
508msReaction time
30.3%T opening success
38.6%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
6.02HE damage / grenade
12.21Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.263% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–90.1025%24 Aug
nuke13–70.1123%14 Aug
train4–130.0214%14 Aug
anubis7–130.0433%11 Aug
cache13–90.0530%11 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0625%1 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0038%1 Aug
cache7–13-0.0422%30 Jul
dust213–60.0334%30 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0517%30 Jul
nuke13–5-0.0229%28 Jul
cache10–13-0.0521%28 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0135%28 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0229%21 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0416%16 Jul
nuke13–50.0523%16 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0225%15 Jul
ancient7–13-0.068%15 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0420%15 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0738%11 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0218%11 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0324%11 Jul
cache9–13-0.0623%10 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0441%10 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0517%9 Jul
anubis13–100.0223%9 Jul
nuke13–100.0315%9 Jul
ancient16–140.0027%8 Jul
cache13–90.0317%8 Jul
nuke13–110.0327%8 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0321%8 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0120%8 Jul
overpass8–13-0.0219%27 Jun
ancient9–130.0222%27 Jun
dust213–50.0147%21 Jun
mirage14–160.0329%21 Jun
dust213–50.0224%29 May
mirage4–13-0.0614%29 May
nuke2–13-0.0537%29 May
dust213–20.1312%28 May
nuke13–90.0125%27 May
mirage13–60.0636%24 May
dust213–5-0.0129%24 May
ancient13–100.0018%24 May
dust213–40.1130%22 May
ancient10–13-0.0523%22 May
mirage13–8-0.0113%22 May
ancient6–13-0.0617%21 May
mirage8–13-0.0018%21 May
nuke13–20.029%21 May
ancient13–10.0112%17 May
dust23–13-0.0618%17 May
cache13–60.1033%15 May
nuke5–13-0.0634%15 May
dust23–130.0122%15 May
anubis9–13-0.0223%13 May
mirage13–20.0616%13 May
ancient13–70.0322%13 May
dust213–80.0324%12 May
mirage13–10.0624%12 May
ancient7–13-0.0530%10 May
nuke13–50.0829%10 May
mirage7–130.0233%10 May
nuke13–60.0230%9 May
anubis9–140.0030%9 May
dust29–13-0.0628%9 May
nuke13–60.0430%8 May
ancient14–16-0.0328%8 May
dust216–140.0428%8 May
cache12–120.0741%6 May
anubis13–4-0.0214%4 May
ancient13–70.0124%4 May
mirage13–100.0121%4 May
dust29–130.0032%4 May
anubis9–13-0.0313%4 May
nuke13–100.0224%2 May
ancient13–90.0214%2 May
nuke13–7-0.0027%2 May
dust210–13-0.0136%2 May
overpass11–130.0428%2 May
nuke13–6-0.0228%1 May
ancient6–13-0.0319%1 May
mirage13–5-0.0115%1 May
dust24–00.0418%30 Apr
ancient13–6-0.0419%30 Apr
dust29–7-0.0210%30 Apr
mirage13–80.0522%29 Apr
dust216–130.0329%29 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0425%28 Apr
dust213–110.0227%28 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0339%27 Apr
nuke13–90.0434%27 Apr
dust213–20.0612%27 Apr
ancient13–100.0325%27 Apr
dust210–130.0538%27 Apr
mirage13–160.0122%27 Apr
mirage13–4-0.0138%25 Apr
nuke13–1-0.0035%24 Apr
mirage9–130.0114%24 Apr
dust213–20.1023%7 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →