☆★

☆★ — CS2 Stats

ME76561198126650601[U:1:166384873]Steam profile ↗

832Tracked matches70%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,807Purple band · top ~13.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#11246 of 22848 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

18,496Peak Premier on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 18,807
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,193 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG☆★PREMIER18,807 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning39
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT58384Last 10058%Win rateWWWTLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.0
Aggression3.1
Utility4.0
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels0.0

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 51 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning3.9
Utility4.0
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels0.3
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time543ms−44ms
first ⅓ avg 587ms → last ⅓ avg 543ms
Headshot accuracy27.8%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 29.9% → last ⅓ avg 27.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — anubis 13–6
130Biggest win — nuke
10Longest win streak
W3Current streak
95In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 88% over 8cacheWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB24121250%-0.01
nukeS1611569%0.00
dust2A149564%0.02
cacheC104640%-0.01
ancientA106460%0.03
infernoC94544%-0.01
anubisS87188%0.02
vertigo42250%-0.04
office2020%-0.05
fachwerk110100%0.02
train110100%0.01
debris110100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

18Matches
44%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.2%Headshot accuracy
34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.3%Spray accuracy
84.5%Counter-strafing
7.5°Preaim
547msReaction time
18.9%T opening success
32.8%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
2.9%Flash assists
10.00HE damage / grenade
4.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 18.9031% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–11-0.0231%28 Aug
vertigo13–9-0.0728%28 Aug
cache13–80.0430%27 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0819%25 Aug
dust210–130.0930%25 Aug
mirage13–80.0127%23 Aug
cache13–8-0.0110%23 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0424%23 Aug
dust213–3-0.0326%23 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0022%23 Aug
nuke13–9-0.1142%23 Aug
mirage11–13-0.058%23 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0122%22 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0828%21 Aug
vertigo5–13-0.094%19 Aug
ancient13–100.0022%19 Aug
dust211–13-0.0312%19 Aug
dust213–80.0340%19 Aug
anubis12–12-0.0816%17 Aug
anubis13–30.0035%17 Aug
nuke13–4-0.0029%17 Aug
nuke13–110.0633%17 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0232%17 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0546%17 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0344%16 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0426%16 Aug
anubis13–90.0732%16 Aug
mirage16–12-0.0229%16 Aug
ancient13–30.0229%16 Aug
vertigo12–120.0048%15 Aug
office4–13-0.0237%15 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0434%15 Aug
nuke13–00.0723%15 Aug
mirage13–110.0240%14 Aug
dust23–13-0.0945%14 Aug
anubis16–13-0.0215%13 Aug
mirage13–70.0925%13 Aug
ancient13–70.0927%13 Aug
anubis13–50.0518%12 Aug
dust210–130.0323%12 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0126%12 Aug
dust213–40.0117%12 Aug
dust28–130.019%12 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0524%11 Aug
inferno16–13-0.0123%10 Aug
inferno14–160.0324%8 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0313%8 Aug
dust213–40.0755%8 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0216%8 Aug
ancient5–130.0432%7 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0314%7 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0618%7 Aug
cache5–13-0.0136%7 Aug
cache6–12-0.0453%3 Aug
ancient13–30.0619%3 Aug
mirage13–90.0236%2 Aug
inferno7–130.0654%1 Aug
cache5–13-0.0463%1 Aug
dust213–70.0425%31 Jul
nuke13–80.0232%31 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0323%30 Jul
mirage13–110.0619%29 Jul
anubis13–70.0216%29 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0229%26 Jul
cache11–13-0.0724%26 Jul
cache13–9-0.0124%26 Jul
dust213–90.1024%26 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0424%26 Jul
ancient4–130.0529%26 Jul
mirage13–60.0525%25 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0124%25 Jul
dust213–9-0.0420%25 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0126%24 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0318%23 Jul
nuke13–70.0836%23 Jul
office5–13-0.0825%23 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0738%23 Jul
nuke0–90.0267%23 Jul
ancient13–50.1027%23 Jul
nuke13–50.0239%22 Jul
nuke12–120.0331%22 Jul
mirage13–100.1233%22 Jul
cache5–13-0.0430%21 Jul
dust213–4-0.0331%21 Jul
cache13–80.0726%20 Jul
nuke13–50.0344%20 Jul
vertigo13–70.0224%20 Jul
mirage13–110.0037%20 Jul
fachwerk13–70.0222%20 Jul
mirage16–140.0220%19 Jul
inferno13–90.0322%19 Jul
anubis13–60.1333%19 Jul
dust213–50.0729%19 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0424%19 Jul
train13–100.0146%19 Jul
nuke13–5-0.0229%19 Jul
debris9–50.0730%19 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0019%19 Jul
cache7–130.0130%18 Jul
mirage8–130.0126%18 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches10-Win StreakAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →